I have a Question

[John81]

Have anyone of you went to Obama's website to actually read what his issues are for? Or Do you just read what the republican party put up about him that are lies?

Do you ever tire of accusing folks here of believing and spreading lies? An abundant amount of proof has been put forth to back up the claims most folks have made here regarding Obama and they are not from Republican sources.

One should love and honour their dad but that doesn't make him right. Your dad is obviously biased when it comes to Obama, as are a great many within most Unions. You would do well to check the facts for yourself rather than rely upon your dad, or any human, when it comes to Obama or any politician.

All politicians these days lie. Some lies are more bold and brazen than others, but they all say that which they know isn't true and they promote what they know they can't deliver and they say they will do something one way when they know they will have to do it another way.

Obama is anti-Christian, pro-baby murder, anti-constitution, pro-socialism, and he denies the Christ of the Bible. Why would you want to support such a person?

[Will]

I looked at Obama's actual issues that he stood for. And there was very little that I could stand with. His fiscal(economic) policy will do tremendous harm to the people on "Main Street" if he gets to put it in place. Obama will bring change if he can, and that change will be bad.

[HappyChristian]

KJVK - not only did I read his website, I read it every time he changed it (after all, he promised change! ). And I looked into the public record of his service to the state of Illinois. He doesn't have a real record in the federal senate because he began running for POTUS almost immediately after being elected.

His policies and practices are going to be harmful to the US. Yes, he will bring change, but it will not be the change you or your dad thinks it will be.

Instead of just believing everything the media says about BO, maybe you should check further. I read part of one of his books (the one he is supposed to have actually authored...the other one was ghost written). And I was not impressed in the slightest.

Personally, I hope he does well. I don't want to see him fail, because his failure as POTUS will be bad for America. But he does not believe the constitution he will be swearing to uphold...he believes his version of what he thinks it is supposed to mean for us now...

His appointments, though, show what he is...AZ Gov. as Sec of Homeland Security - Amnesty for all illegals, here we come! And so many others!

[deputydog530]

:goodpost:

I just listened to him and heard the CHANGE! He told the crowds he was speaking to what they wanted to hear.

Yes McCain did to, I just did not catch him in as many lies as BO.

I will pray for him, though I cant support him in any way.

Just dont follow the other lemings off the cliff is all im saying.

Our country has turned its back on God and we are reaping the consequences.

[IM4given]

Maybe things will not be so bad after all - he has put on all of the Clinton administration as his staff - and we survived the Clinton years, now didn't we. It would appear that the "change" might just be a repeat of the Clinton Administration - which will not be much of a change, if you really think about it. I wonder what Monica Lewinsky is doing these days?

[trc123]

Maybe things will not be so bad after all - he has put on all of the Clinton administration as his staff - and we survived the Clinton years' date=' now didn't we. It would appear that the "change" might just be a repeat of the Clinton Administration - which will not be much of a change, if you really think about it. I wonder what Monica Lewinsky is doing these days?[/quote']

Clinton was much more of a moderate and fiscally conservative than most of the Democrats were (are). I don't think Obama is going to put his "change" up against Clinton; but rather Bush!

[JerryNumbers]

With the people he is going to have in his cabinet, seems like it will be the same old thing with the same old people.

Now Hillary will probably try her best to stay in the spotlight and steal the show.

How could she agree to work for a man who she said was not really experienced enough and capable of answering the phone at 3:00 in the morning? Perhaps she thinks she will be his boss.

[deafnva77]

It's probably be the same but in clinton's year, the issues on homosexual wasn't as big back then. Obama will have an opportunity to appoint federal judges who support homosexual agenda. So when a homosexual sue a christian business such as eharmony, that judge is more likely to favor that homosexual.

[JerryNumbers]

The big difference in homosexuals now days and when Clinton was president is many have came out of the closet openly declaring they be a homosexual. Back them one could be appointed to a position and we might never know that they're a homosexual.

But I feel sure there be many who are still in the closet for fear if they are open about it that it will hinder their career.

[HappyChristian]

Clinton still practiced Reaganomics (trickle down theory) to a great point. BO does not believe in trickle down - he thinks things should trickle up. But the only thing that will trickle up is poverty. How many of you know people at the bottom of the economy who can start jobs and pay people?

He also believes in spreading the wealth a bit more drastically than Clinton did. He is choosing a lot of Clinton retreads, but I think he's choosing the more liberal of them.

It will be interesting to see how Hillary handles herself. And I find it interesting that he nominated her for that when they have opposite views on Iraq!

And he's still holding press conferences with the office of the President Elect sign...no such office and he isn't PE until after the Electoral College convenes and votes. :lol:

[heartstrings]

KJVbeliever,
Stalin, PolPot, MaoTse Dong killed millions of their own people, way more than Hitler. Study your history of socialist regimes and you will see that they tend to have a consistent pattern of disregard for human life. Why?? Because they have no fear of God. Actually, their very intent is to deny God and religion "the opiate of the people". They seek absolute power and anyone who apposes them is imprisoned, enslaved or eliminated. Think it can't happen in America? Don't kid yourself. What do they promise now? "Equality" right? That is one of the first promises communists make. The only problem is, when you look at RUssia, China, there is STILL social stratification. There is no equality like they promise.

Why do the socialists want to "regulate" or eliminate gun ownership? Because they care about crime? I don't think so. THAT is another tried and proven step toward Socialist control. The reason they want your guns is because without guns, you are helpless against the government. It's much easier to run roughshod over an unarmed populace. Because then, the only ones who have guns are the criminals and the government.

Obama is a Socialist as evidenced by his policies and his party affiliation. He has consistently voted in favor of abortion. Anyone who could do such hideous acts to an innocent child is a cold hearted, vile, reprobate and anyone who condones it as he does, is just as guilty. This is an unregenerated heart which is without natural affection and the only cure for that is to give his heart to the Lord Jesus Christ.

[Guest Guest]

KJVbeliever,
Stalin, PolPot, MaoTse Dong killed millions of their own people, way more than Hitler. Study your history of socialist regimes and you will see that they tend to have a consistent pattern of disregard for human life. Why?? Because they have no fear of God. Actually, their very intent is to deny God and religion "the opiate of the people". They seek absolute power and anyone who apposes them is imprisoned, enslaved or eliminated. Think it can't happen in America? Don't kid yourself. What do they promise now? "Equality" right? That is one of the first promises communists make. The only problem is, when you look at RUssia, China, there is STILL social stratification. There is no equality like they promise.

Why do the socialists want to "regulate" or eliminate gun ownership? Because they care about crime? I don't think so. THAT is another tried and proven step toward Socialist control. The reason they want your guns is because without guns, you are helpless against the government. It's much easier to run roughshod over an unarmed populace. Because then, the only ones who have guns are the criminals and the government.

Obama is a Socialist as evidenced by his policies and his party affiliation. He has consistently voted in favor of abortion. Anyone who could do such hideous acts to an innocent child is a cold hearted, vile, reprobate and anyone who condones it as he does, is just as guilty. This is an unregenerated heart which is without natural affection and the only cure for that is to give his heart to the Lord Jesus Christ.

Could someone please frame that post, or save it to the home page, or put it up in lights, :thumb


:coffee

[Guest Guest]

Could someone please frame that post, or save it to the home page, or put it up in lights, :thumb


:coffee

YES! This is a keeper. Well said, heartstrings. :amen:

[JerryNumbers]

KJVbeliever,
Stalin, PolPot, MaoTse Dong killed millions of their own people, way more than Hitler. Study your history of socialist regimes and you will see that they tend to have a consistent pattern of disregard for human life. Why?? Because they have no fear of God. Actually, their very intent is to deny God and religion "the opiate of the people". They seek absolute power and anyone who apposes them is imprisoned, enslaved or eliminated. Think it can't happen in America? Don't kid yourself. What do they promise now? "Equality" right? That is one of the first promises communists make. The only problem is, when you look at RUssia, China, there is STILL social stratification. There is no equality like they promise.

Why do the socialists want to "regulate" or eliminate gun ownership? Because they care about crime? I don't think so. THAT is another tried and proven step toward Socialist control. The reason they want your guns is because without guns, you are helpless against the government. It's much easier to run roughshod over an unarmed populace. Because then, the only ones who have guns are the criminals and the government.

Obama is a Socialist as evidenced by his policies and his party affiliation. He has consistently voted in favor of abortion. Anyone who could do such hideous acts to an innocent child is a cold hearted, vile, reprobate and anyone who condones it as he does, is just as guilty. This is an unregenerated heart which is without natural affection and the only cure for that is to give his heart to the Lord Jesus Christ.

The thing is, many people, even many Christians can't understand if you support someone who is for sins against God your guilty of supporting said sins.

Just think, over half of our population supposed Obama who supports abortion, he even supports for the aborted baby who is still living, to be laid aside to die.

True, he is vile and clod hearted, just as those who supported him.

[IM4given]

The thing is, many people, even many Christians can't understand if you support someone who is for sins against God your guilty of supporting said sins.

Just think, over half of our population supposed Obama who supports abortion, he even supports for the aborted baby who is still living, to be laid aside to die.

True, he is vile and clod hearted, just as those who supported him.

Should we begin counting down to the day of the Second Coming? I am ready Bro. Jerry! :pray