Jump to content
Online Baptist


Advanced Member
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


rstrats last won the day on August 16 2011

rstrats had the most liked content!

About rstrats

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location:
  • Denomination
  • IFB?

Recent Profile Visitors

3,988 profile views
  1. So Matthew is placing the crucifixion no earlier than the 15th? I don't see how Mark 2:27 shows that it is a discrepancy.
  2. What has that got to do with my question to robycop3 that you quoted?
  3. So Matthew is placing the crucifixion no earlier than the 15th?
  4. Ok, thanks. We all misread things from time to time. If by Saturday you mean the 7th day of the week, how do you deal with Mark 16:9?
  5. SureWord, re: "The holidays were made for man not man for the holidays so God allowed some leeway. Mark 2:27" Actually, that verse is only referring to the Sabbath. And I don't see how it allows any leeway with regard to when the Sabbath is to be observed.
  6. What is your point with regard to the topic - "Good Friday"?
  7. But I'm still curious what your reasoning was for your need to quote me when your addition to the discussion dealt with John Young's comment?
  8. The topic doesn't need to be locked. It just needs the powers-that-be to delete all of the off topic comments.
  9. 1 Timothy115, re: "No, it also has to do with what day you worship the Lord." Again, the context of the whole chapter from start to finish has to do with regard to food practices. "Paul is writing about asceticism. Some in the church at Rome believed Christians should eat only vegetables. Paul calls these people 'weak in the faith' (verses 1-2). The stronger in faith know they could also eat meat. Nothing in God’s law prescribes vegetarianism. The stronger in faith knew they were free from non-biblical asceticism. A part of the controversy that had sprung up between the weak and the st
  10. To what "folly" are you referring? Please be specific. To whom are you referring?
  11. Hugh_Flower, re: "Why are you looking for a published author..." See the OP. re: "It seems like you would like to argue with them when you find them." No, not for the purpose of this topic. re: " Sunday seems like a good day of any to worship the Lord in fellowship as that was the day the Lord rose again." And that was the reason for starting this topic. See the OP. re: "Whose to say we should keep sabath?...Whose to say the day we are required to worship?...If sabath was still required, you would think it would be a very big deal to a
  12. 1Timothy115, re: "Ironside lived it..." I don't know what that means. re: "Now if you're looking for an answer to the person you originally encountered..." I am. re: "...you have plenty to present from previous person's comments." If there is, I haven't seen it. re: "If they don't care to agree after this why bother with it anyway." So far I haven't seen anything to take back to them. re: "[see Romans 14:5-6]" I don't understand what that has to do with it. The whole chapter is talkin
  13. re: "Mark is, first of all a VERY published author." I don't see where Mark argues for a change of observance from the seventh day of the week to the first day of the week due to the idea of a first day of the week resurrection. That is also the case with Matthew 28:1, Luke 24:1, and John 20:1. Also, I don't see where Ironside argues for the change either.
  14. Actually, he isn't. Paul doesn't use the idea of a first day of the week resurrection to justify a change of observance from the seventh day of the week to the first say of the week, nor uses Mark 16:9 to support a first day of the week resurrection.
  15. Leviticus 23:6 says : “And on the fifteenth day of the same month is the feast of unleavened bread...” However, Matthew 26:17 says: “Now on the first day of the feast of unleavened bread the disciples came to Jesus, saying unto him, Where wilt thou that we prepare for thee to eat the passover?” Any thoughts on the seeming discrepancy?
  • Create New...