John Young

The problem with modernist philosophy is not just using corrupt texts but also the lack of care toward word accuracy which historically brought about those corruptions in the first place. They always go hand in hand. Just because something is a synonym and similar in meaning does not mean it is an precise equivalent word or equal in meaning. (ie. Easter and Passover are the same Greek word equivalents but carry separate English meanings, drawn from historical and biblical context in order to convey more than the original Greek word itself ever could. Additionally things like Author vs starter,

Exodus 22:9 For all manner of trespass, whether it be for ox, for ass, for sheep, for raiment, or for any manner of lost thing, which another challengeth to be his, the cause of both parties shall come before the judges; and whom the judges shall condemn, he shall pay double unto his neighbour.

When you use "archaic" in reference any word in the KJV it shows you've already drunk the modernist cool aid and believe in their errant reasoning. I don't say that to be harsh but rather to ask that you reconsider that concept in reference to the words of the KJV. Every trade, and even sub cultures, has words that are more common among that trade than the general populace. The translators used a unique English format so that it could be cross cultural with minimal effort. The problem with modernist logic is that now they must make a separate "simple" U.S. update, a separate "simple" U.K. upda

The first step is assessment. To waste time trying without proper discernment causes failure. Luke 14:28-32 KJV For which of you, intending to build a tower, sitteth not down first, and counteth the cost, whether he have sufficient to finish it ? [29] Lest haply, after he hath laid the foundation, and is not able to finish it, all that behold it begin to mock him, [30] Saying, This man began to build, and was not able to finish. [31] Or what king, going to make war against another king, sitteth not down first, and consulteth whether he be able with ten thousand to meet him that comet

Most of the things brought up are not "conclusive evidence" in the strictest terms but they are indicators (circumstantial evidence) that shows the need for further investigation. The only way to verify if fraud actually did occur, one way or the other, would be to audit the signatures of the mail in ballots and of the Dominion system. Short of that (ie. recounting ballots regardless of source) conclusive proof of fraud one way or the other would be impossible. Currently the question is not wither or not we have evidence to prove fraud but rather is there enough circumstantial evidence

The governor of Georgia has been calling for a signature audit, which would clearly determine wither or not fraud was committed. So far the Georgia Secretary of State has not responded. In the article below it indicates the "unfounded" video of workers tallying votes without oversight was brought up in the official senate hearings. https://www.cbs46.com/news/governor-kemp-calls-on-ga-sos-to-conduct-signature-audit-of-ballots/article_d6ab0aba-35f0-11eb-8713-834ffd0b8200.html

Another thing about Spurgeon is that he never let Theological intellectualism to get in the way of the practical commands of scripture. So while he was a Calvinist he was also very concerned with carrying out the great commission through evangelism. Also if one looks beyond his Calvinism and into most of his messages they will see a person more in line with today's Fundamentalist Baptist than with today's Reformed Calvinist.

A lot of ex-Fox News people have been promoting NewsMax (https://www.newsmax.com) and One America News Network (OAN) (https://www.oann.com) but I haven't looked into them yet to see what I think about them.

Some friends of ours who live in Arizona claim they were sent three actual mail in ballots (not the application) from MI. But they had not lived in MI in over 20+ years but apparently were still on the rolls and someone had applied for them on their behalf.

https://thenewamerican.com/heres-why-bidens-pennsylvania-numbers-are-raising-voter-fraud-concerns/

In what world is standing 12 or 6 feet equate to being allowed to check documents much less challenge a ballot? Maybe companies can tell that to the IRS next time they get audited. Regardless, the courts will decide soon enough whither or not they were denied the right to PROPERLY check. Simply taking the word of the those who possibly denied the right or opinions of those who were not there, over those who claim they were denied isn't good enough in this situation.

You can't have any evidence of fraud if you are not allowed to check. That's the current issue at hand is that Inspectors were not allowed to properly check the mail in ballots. In the latest press release that is what they alleged:

I'm not sure about the other states but the "mail in voting" system here in MI has only been put in place this year and was justified as a safety measure for COVID. I doubt it ever was vetted by anyone outside of the current administration because non-essential activity (such as close government scrutiny) has been denied due to social distancing policies put in place.

If official Facebook Page likes/followers are any indicator of who will win the election then we have: Republican: Trump, 30M Democrat: Biden, 3.4M Libertarian: Jorgensen, 469K Twitter Followers: Republican: Trump, 87.3M Democrat: Biden, 11.8M Libertarian: Jorgensen, 178.2K YouTube Subscribers: Republican: Trump, 1.85M Democrat: Biden, 511K Libertarian: Jorgensen, 16.4K Joe Biden is doing better than the others on MySpace... as Candidate Obama's running mate! (I don't think they've updated it lately over there. lol)

They are historical because he is writing the book to them after he had the vision and he was directed to give each a whole copy of the vision. Revelation 1:1-9 is the introduction to John's testimony of the vision. Just as John is real, so to are the churches to whom he was writing. The rest of us are simply invited to read, hear and keep the testimony. While they are the first recipients the rest of us are called upon to apply the revelation to our day and keep it for the next. Though its fulfilment is future, it had a present application for them then and for each of us who were to come aft