Jump to content
  • Welcome Guest

    For an ad free experience on Online Baptist, Please login or register for free

If today was election day...


Who would you vote for?  

1 member has voted

  1. 1. Who would you vote for?

    • McCain/Palin
      14
    • Obama/Biden
      1
    • Baldwin/Castle
      13
    • Other (please tell us in your post)
      1
    • Not voting - Boycotting the election
      3


Recommended Posts

  • Administrators
Posted

I think Palin could more than hold her own against Hillary. She is the anti-thesis of Hillary, and I don't think Repubs would have a problem voting for her - Independents, either.

  • Replies 164
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members
Posted
I think Palin could more than hold her own against Hillary. She is the anti-thesis of Hillary' date=' and I don't think Repubs would have a problem voting for her - Independents, either.[/quote']

I agree...She is moderate enough to not make people too mad, but conservative enough to take some independent votes. Plus Hillary will be "older" by then, and Palin still young and beautiful. Evidently that counts for alot in today's society... :roll
  • Members
Posted


You two could be right...but I was totally unimpressed by her debate performance against Biden. To me, she came off as totally unknowledgeable and inexperienced, dodging the important issues, and changing the subject right and left. (Biden was worse, since he lied repeatedly about his voting record.) I would gladly vote for Palin, but most women, given the choice, would vote for Hillary. (Remember that when Palin was selected, it was the Democratic women who left the Obama ticket in droves. Those women aren't going to vote for Sarah Palin if she's running against Hillary.)
  • Members
Posted


Actually I heard that the women leaving the Obama campaign was not as dramatic as they thought it would be. Many of them decided to stick with their party.

I think part of Palin's plan during the debate was to let her voice be heard without media filter. She only had so much time, so she had to use it. Also it was hard for her because she had to defend McCain. I think if she runs for herself and as herself, she'll be a whole different "animal" if you can use the phrase.
  • Administrators
Posted

Yeah - remember that she said she was going to answer the questions she wanted to. She was very annoyed at many of the questions put to her by Gibson and Couric. Can't blame her - they were just out to get her.

I think had she actually been debating BO, running for POTUS herself, she would probably have brought up some of the issues people are tiptoeing around, like BO's alliances with William Ayres, Bernadine Dorhn and so forth.

  • Members
Posted

We have to remember that all these debates are set up. They are not fair. They purposefully bring up questions to make Obama look good, and McCain to look bad.

I surely do wish someone could expose the raunchy socialist media one of these days! Of course the media would never allow that LOL.

  • Administrators
Posted
We have to remember that all these debates are set up. They are not fair. They purposefully bring up questions to make Obama look good, and McCain to look bad.

I surely do wish someone could expose the raunchy socialist media one of these days! Of course the media would never allow that LOL.


I don't know - some of the questions last night were pretty good. I liked the last one - and how Obama used it as a chance to tug heartstrings about his upbringing...funny thing, though, whenever he talks about the wonderful opportunity he had for his education, he doesn't mention the alliances of those who raised money for him to pay for his Harvard education...
  • Members
Posted


I saw Palin's interview by Chris Wallace after the debate and was very impressed. He asked her about the things she didn't appear to know about and she was very substantive and knew what she was talking about. Too bad neither McCain or Palin showed for the debates.
  • Members
Posted
A vote under duress is not a vote of freedom.

Being pressured to vote for someone who doesn't stand for the Constitution of these United States because he is the "lesser of two evils" or because "a vote against him is a vote for Obama" is something I've come to loathe over the past year.

If I vote for McCain, I vote against the United States Constitution (re: McCain/Feingold). If I vote for Obama I vote against the United States Constitution (re: Anti-Gun stance). Both candidates have demonstrated a disdain for the document that would govern their power.

I refuse ever again to vote in a way that is based on anything other than my convictions based in God's Word and the Constitution of the United States.

I'll digress with a question: Has voting for the lesser of two evils for the last 30 years kept our nation from going socialist/progressive?

If you always do what you always did, you'll always get what you always got. :cooldude:


:amen: :goodpost:
  • Members
Posted

Has anyone noticed that the more information that comes out about Sarah Palin, and the more she speaks, it's obvious she is far less "Christian" and far less conservative than they first portrayed her to be?

  • Members
Posted
Has anyone noticed that the more information that comes out about Sarah Palin' date=' and the more she speaks, it's obvious she is far less "Christian" and far less conservative than they first portrayed her to be?[/quote']

....no....?
  • Members
Posted
Has anyone noticed that the more information that comes out about Sarah Palin' date=' and the more she speaks, it's obvious she is far less "Christian" and far less conservative than they first portrayed her to be?[/quote']

no, not really, I've already knew what she stood for. Even abortion.
  • Members
Posted

When I watched all the coverage of Sarah Palin at first they put her forth as a staunch Christian and solid conservative. As they have put forth actual information about her and as she has spoke more herself, it's become evident she is neither a staunch Christian nor is she a solid conservative. She seems to be just another neo-con.

Has she professed to be born again or given a testimony anywhere? I might have missed this due to the turmoil around here that's sapped so much of my time.

From her own statements she doesn't take solid biblical stands on the issues of homosexuality, abortion or evolution.

I do enjoy listening to her talk, especially when she's feeling comfortable and is really more herself. She's absolutely more fun to listen to than McCain, Obama or Biden!

  • Members
Posted

It does not MATTER if she is a Christian! I mean yeah, how nice that would be, but its not something I"m looking for. Therefore, I'm not disappointed when it doesn't happen!

  • Members
Posted
It does not MATTER if she is a Christian! I mean yeah' date=' how nice that would be, but its not something I"m looking for. Therefore, I'm not disappointed when it doesn't happen![/quote']

Actually, it should matter. She has professed to be a Christian. People are looking at her as a Christian.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...