Man & Woman

[TheGloryLand]

What is a Woman? 
 

I don’t know,I am not a biologist…

[TheGloryLand]

This was the answer of the future High Supreme Court judge.

[TheGloryLand]

A woman is an adult female human.^[1][2] Prior to adulthood, a female human is referred to as a girl (a female child or adolescent).^[3] The plural women is sometimes used in certain phrases such as "women's rights" to denote female humans regardless of age.

A woman

Typically, women have two X chromosomes and are capable of pregnancy and giving birth from puberty until menopause. Female anatomy is distinguished from male anatomy by the female reproductive system, which includes the ovaries, fallopian tubes, uterus, vagina, and vulva. The adult female pelvis is wider, the hips broader, and the breasts larger than that of adult males. Women have significantly less facial and other body hair, have a higher body fat composition, and are on average shorter and less muscular than men.

Throughout human history, traditional gender roles have often defined and limited women's activities and opportunities; many religious doctrines stipulate certain rules for women. With restrictions loosening during the 20th century in many societies, women have gained access to careers beyond the traditional homemaker, and the ability to pursue higher education. Violence against women, whether within families or in communities, has a long history and is primarily committed by men. Some women are denied reproductive rights. The movements and ideologies of feminism have a shared goal of achieving gender equality.

Trans women develop a gender identitythat does not align with their male sex assignment at birth, while intersexwomen may have sex characteristics that do not fit typical notions of female biology

[BrotherTony]

We're not sure she'll be a Supreme Court Justice yet. There are still some variables to take into account, and some players might be changing their minds on their votes. If Susan Collins of Maine votes FOR her, as she did when they put her up for a Circuit Court or appellate positions a short while back, then we'll be in deep trouble. If this woman can't give the truth on what a woman is, and is giving out very lenient sentences to child sex offenders, she SHOULD NOT be on the SCOTUS.

[Napsterdad]

On 3/26/2022 at 6:58 AM, E Morales said:

What is a Woman? 

I don’t know, I am not a biologist…

The follow-on question should have been: "Are you a woman?"

If she answered "yes" then the next question would have to be: "how do you know, not being a biologist?"

If she answered "no" or "I don't know", then what...?

Regardless the answers given following that initial response, how can we trust this woman to adjudicate America's most pressing and sensitive issues when she can't even answer one of life's most basic fundamental questions?

This one fundamental question established the fact that Ketanji Brown Jackson is not fit to be on the Supreme Court: or any court for that matter.

Edited March 27, 2022 by Napsterdad

[Jerry]

I am not sure who you are referring to - but this is what God's Word says (and what came to mind as I read this):

Isaiah 3:12 As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them. O my people, they which lead thee cause thee to err, and destroy the way of thy paths.

Woe to that country when women and children rule.

[SureWord]

There's no way they'll not confirm her to the Supreme Court. The Uniparty will be too terrified of accusations of racism and misogyny is they don't. 

[wretched]

3 hours ago, SureWord said:

There's no way they'll not confirm her to the Supreme Court. The Uniparty will be too terrified of accusations of racism and misogyny is they don't. 

Or perhaps they simply want to normalize pedophilia which seems to be the reason for this junior, no experience, unqualified pick whose short track record is rife with pedo leniency. The reprobate party loves to groom, rape and murder children. That is where we are as a nation in the end. Not only are you required to condone sodomy and transsexual deviance (the only reason this creature would not answer the question) but you will soon also be required to condone pedophilia. 

 

[1Timothy115]

5 hours ago, SureWord said:

There's no way they'll not confirm her to the Supreme Court. The Uniparty will be too terrified of accusations of racism and misogyny is they don't. 

Yes, they probably will confirm her.  Further evidence Romans 1 is as applicable today as it was when Paul by the Holy Spirit penned it.

2 hours ago, wretched said:

Or perhaps they simply want to normalize pedophilia which seems to be the reason for this junior, no experience, unqualified pick whose short track record is rife with pedo leniency. The reprobate party loves to groom, rape and murder children. That is where we are as a nation in the end. Not only are you required to condone sodomy and transsexual deviance (the only reason this creature would not answer the question) but you will soon also be required to condone pedophilia. 

 

Romans 1:32   Who knowing the judgment of God, that they which commit such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.