Jump to content
  • Welcome Guest

    For an ad free experience on Online Baptist, Please login or register for free

Which best describes your position on the KJV/KJVO/TR issue?  

3 members have voted

  1. 1. Which best describes your position on the KJV/KJVO/TR issue?

    • 1. I believe the King James Version is a faithful translation while also believing that there are other translations out there, including foreign language translations and Critical Text translations that are equally faithful. For instance, the NASB is a faithful translation to the texts it was translated from. The textual issue is as a non-issue. I use the KJV because I believe it to be the best translation although I don't have a problem studying from other versions to gain differing or a deeper perspective.
      6
    • 2. I believe that the Received Text is the accurate text and any Bible faithfully translated from it is God's preserved Word. I am not opposed to a new English (or any other language) translation from the TR as long as it is faithful and accurate.
      16
    • 3. I believe that the KJV is the only pure translation for English speakers and that nothing will ever replace the KJV in English no matter how archaic the 1611 English becomes.
      12
    • 4. I believe that the KJV is the only pure translation for English speakers. While accepting translations in other languages, I would still believe that the KJV is superior to all the rest.
      8
    • 5. I believe that the King James Version is the only true Bible in the world, that it - itself - was given by verbal inspiration of God in 1611, and that all nations should learn 1611 English in order to have the one, pure Bible.
      2
    • 6. I am not KJVO at all.
      9


Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

No bitterness here! :Green It is hilarious to me how folks use the bitterness card when their heros are "attacked". I know; I used to do the same thing.

I'm just judging righteous judgment, exercising discernment and trying to warn others. Calvin can't defend himself either but that doesn't stop anyone from talking about some false teaching he promoted.

  • Replies 457
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Guest
Posted

Now that these men have gotten numerous amount of attention on OB...can we get back to the Textual/version stance? I think I would welcome a learning lesson from brothers and sisters in Christ on OB...if we left men out of it. Can we stick to the Bible? This is so funny. :lol Really? Oh Lord...HELP!

Guest Guest
Posted
But you're the one who brought up the charge of bitterness. I don't want to argue about any of it' date=' really. Just wanted to let Bakers know that I agreed with her, and let you know that I'm not bitter. :thumb[/quote']

If we want to talk about who started it, she did by posting a long rant about what's "wrong" with Dr. Ruckman. She wasn't the first to bring Ruckman into this topic, though.

It always goes this way. On any long topic about the KJV, someone will call me or someone else a KJVO-extremist, and compare us with Ruckman as if it marks us as heretics or something. Then it turns into a big debate about Ruckman and the topic gets locked.

I'm just trying to keep it from becoming a big Ruckman debate so this topic keeps going for a while. :smile
  • Members
Posted

Candlelight, what else is there to say? Really? The poll tells us how people believe. After 26 pages, if we haven't learned something new then we probably won't. This discussion will continue in the same manner that it already has here and in other threads.

Some people believe in a directly-inspired translation, as in God breathed again in 1611. While this has no Biblical or logical basis, it is accepted by "faith".

Still others believe in preservation as the result of inspiration. God promised to preserve His Word. He didn't promise to reinspire it every time a better translation came along. This too is accepted by faith in what God has promised regarding preservation.

Some people hold to a textual line as being God's preserved line. This is accepted by faith in what God has promised regarding preservation.

Some people believe that God has preserved His Word in many different places and many different translations. This is accepted by faith in what God has promised regarding preservation.

  • Members
Posted

If we want to talk about who started it, she did by posting a long rant about what's "wrong" with Dr. Ruckman. She wasn't the first to bring Ruckman into this topic, though.


It wasn't a rant because I'm not angry. I was exposing the truth. And in case you didn't notice, most of what I wrote about concerned the Hyles movement. JH and others preachers like him handle the Word of God deceitfully in order to serve their own purposes. I saw and heard the exact same thing in the video sermon I saw of PR.
Guest Guest
Posted
I think it's been going on plenty long enough! :tum


matie-k... :amen: Can I learn about the Textual/version stance now? The Lord Jesus Christ is my HERO, and no one else...well, I'll add my hubby, pastor, FIL...never mind. You've got my drift, I think? Let's stop this nonsense, and get back to the topic at hand. I don't want to bring anyone's experience (good or bad) into the equation. Pretty, please? :wave:
Guest Guest
Posted
Candlelight, what else is there to say? Really? The poll tells us how people believe. After 26 pages, if we haven't learned something new then we probably won't. This discussion will continue in the same manner that it already has here and in other threads.

Some people believe in a directly-inspired translation, as in God breathed again in 1611. While this has no Biblical or logical basis, it is accepted by "faith".

Still others believe in preservation as the result of inspiration. God promised to preserve His Word. He didn't promise to reinspire it every time a better translation came along. This too is accepted by faith in what God has promised regarding preservation.

Some people hold to a textual line as being God's preserved line. This is accepted by faith in what God has promised regarding preservation.

Some people believe that God has preserved His Word in many different places and many different translations. This is accepted by faith in what God has promised regarding preservation.


I noticed something in this post. You made every position sound "ok" except for the one that us "Ruckmanites" believe.
Guest Guest
Posted

[quote="Bakershalfdozen"]That's because the others are based on preservation (plenty of verses for this) and not re-inspiration (no verses for this).[/quote]

That's because almost everyone here misunderstands the concept of God inspiring a translation. It isn't like God re-wrote the Bible. He inspired the translators (He gave them understanding) as they were translating the King James Bible.

Guest Guest
Posted

Looks like this topic's gonna be locked pretty soon. Happens every time.

  • Members
Posted

I don't know about the other mods or the OP, but I'm not planning on locking it. Looks like we've just run out of things to say. We should start numbering these topics and referring to them that way. :lol:

KJV issue - #3
Pants - #5
Tithing - #7

Have ya'll heard the joke about the guys in prison who had heard the same jokes over and over again so many times they could just call out a number like #10! and everybody would laugh. A new prisoner arrived one day and heard about the joke system so one night he called out, #19! Nobody laughed. Down the hall another prisoner remarked, some can tell 'em and some cain't.

Guest Guest
Posted

[quote="Bakershalfdozen"]I don't know about the other mods or the OP, but I'm not planning on locking it. Looks like we've just run out of things to say. We should start numbering these topics and referring to them that way. :lol:

KJV issue - #3
Pants - #5
Tithing - #7

Have ya'll heard the joke about the guys in prison who had heard the same jokes over and over again so many times they could just call out a number like #10! and everybody would laugh. A new prisoner arrived one day and heard about the joke system so one night he called out, #19! Nobody laughed. Down the hall another prisoner remarked, some can tell 'em and some cain't.[/quote]

I've heard that joke before... and yeah, some topics around here just never end. Of course, I see a reason for the KJV topic to go on... it's the foundation of everything we believe. The pants issue and the tithing issue are more personal.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...