Members rstrats Posted September 13 Author Members Posted September 13 25 minutes ago, Jerry said: Just clarifying my earlier posts which you have great difficulty grasping. I "grasp" everything you're saying. It's just that what you're saying deals with issues for a different topic. Quote
Members BrotherTony Posted September 13 Members Posted September 13 1 hour ago, rstrats said: I "grasp" everything you're saying. It's just that what you're saying deals with issues for a different topic. I don't think so...I believe Jerry has shown the fallacy in a 6th day crucifixion. So, it actually deals with the subject matter. Jerry 1 Quote
Members rstrats Posted September 14 Author Members Posted September 14 53 minutes ago, BrotherTony said: I don't think so...I believe Jerry has shown the fallacy in a 6th day crucifixion. And I agree with that. But again, that's an issue for a different topic. The only concern of this topic is the commonality of saying that a daytime or a night time would be involved with a event when no part of a daytime or no part of a night time could be. To that end, I'm simply looking for examples - plural - to support the idea of commonality. BrotherTony 1 Quote
Members Jerry Posted September 14 Members Posted September 14 You don’t make any sense. Three days and three nights involve daytimes and nighttimes. Quote
Members BrotherTony Posted September 14 Members Posted September 14 1 hour ago, rstrats said: And I agree with that. But again, that's an issue for a different topic. The only concern of this topic is the commonality of saying that a daytime or a night time would be involved with a event when no part of a daytime or no part of a night time could be. To that end, I'm simply looking for examples - plural - to support the idea of commonality. Seems like you're just arguing to argue. Look, the subject laid fallow showing that nobody agrees with a sixth day crucifixion and there's no justification for it. Commonality or not, what the Bible says is all that matters. We're told in scripture to avoid foolish questions, and this, my friend, seems to fit the bill. Jerry 1 Quote
Members rstrats Posted September 14 Author Members Posted September 14 10 hours ago, Jerry said: You don’t make any sense. Three days and three nights involve daytimes and nighttimes. Indeed, they do. What is your point? Quote
Members rstrats Posted September 14 Author Members Posted September 14 9 hours ago, BrotherTony said: re: "Seems like you're just arguing to argue." You're the one doing the arguing. I'm simply informing you that you're posting your comments in the wrong topic. re: "Look, the subject laid fallow showing that nobody agrees with a sixth day crucifixion and there's no justification for it." Nobody looking in here yet, but you never know about someone in the future. re: "We're told in scripture to avoid foolish questions, and this, my friend, seems to fit the bill." You said that it is a Catholic, Lutheran, Greek Orthodox as well as some Baptist churches stance that the crucifixion took place on the 6th day of the week. Would it be a foolish question to ask how they account for the lack of a 3rd night time? 9 hours ago, BrotherTony said: Quote
Members BrotherTony Posted September 14 Members Posted September 14 9 minutes ago, rstrats said: It's foolish and wasteful when it's detracting from the mission laid out by the Lord for us to do? The adversary uses many subjects to rabbit trail Christians. Does this affect your salvation in any way? No! Does it enhance your walk with the Lord? Doubtful. Like I said before the subject laid fallow because it is of little importance to anything or anyone. Quote
Members Jerry Posted September 14 Members Posted September 14 Three night - Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. I can buy you a calculator if that helps you with your addition. Quote
Members rstrats Posted September 14 Author Members Posted September 14 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Jerry said: Three night - Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. I can buy you a calculator if that helps you with your addition. I don't know why you keep saying that since it still has nothing to do with this topic. BTW, you have a question directed to you in post #36. Edited September 14 by rstrats Quote
Members Jerry Posted September 14 Members Posted September 14 Because you keep saying my reply does not make sense to you. I’ve restated it several times to clarify - otherwise, I would have left it as is. Quote
Members rstrats Posted September 14 Author Members Posted September 14 8 minutes ago, Jerry said: Because you keep saying my reply does not make sense to you. I never said that. In fact I agreed with what you wrote about the fallacy of a 6th day crucifixion. It's just that that is an issue for a different topic. Quote
Members rstrats Posted September 29 Author Members Posted September 29 But maybe someone new looking in may know of examples. Quote
Members BrotherTony Posted September 29 Members Posted September 29 2 hours ago, rstrats said: But maybe someone new looking in may know of examples. Don't know why they would if none have so far. Quote
Members rstrats Posted September 30 Author Members Posted September 30 (edited) 20 hours ago, BrotherTony said: Don't know why they would if none have so far. You never know, there might be someone in the future. Edited September 30 by rstrats Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.