Jump to content
  • Welcome Guest

    For an ad free experience on Online Baptist, Please login or register for free

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

Another atrocity in Germany. 

A truck driven into a crowd at a Christmas Market.  Killed at least 12 and wounded about 50.  The original driver of the suspected hijacked Polish truck is said to have  been found shot in his cab. He was first reported to be a co driver.  A suspect has been arrested  but Police now have doubts that he is involved. He is a Pakistani refugee who arrived in Merkle Land about a year ago.  Nigel Farage is verbaly abused for blaming her, and being threatened of legal action for acusing the husband of the murdered MP Jo Cox of supporting terrorism. 

Many years ago, (in 1968 actually) Conservative MP Enoch Powell made what is remembered as his "Rivers Of Blood" speech which effectively ended his polical  career.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/3643823/Enoch-Powells-Rivers-of-Blood-speech.html

But he was not the first to raise the dangers of Muslim immigration in March 1959 General de Gaulle raised a more pointed reference

http://waltwhitemansworld.blogspot.co.uk/2012/08/charles-de-gaulle-warns-about-muslim.html

Below is a Google translation of part of his speech.  Google did not translate his first paragraph for some reason, but I think you will get the gist.

"We are still primarily a European people, Caucasian, Greek and Latin culture and Christian religion. We do not tell a story! Muslims, you went to see? You watched them with their turbans and their djellaba? You see that these are not the French.

Those who advocate integration have a hummingbird brains, even if they are very learned. Try to incorporate oil and vinegar. Shake the bottle. After a while, they will separate again. Arabs are Arabs, the French are French.

You believe that the French body can absorb ten million Muslims, who tomorrow will be twenty million and forty day after tomorrow? If we did the integration, if all the Arabs and Berbers of Algeria were considered French, how do you prevent coming to settle in France, while the standard of living is so much higher? My village will be called [no] more Colombey-les-Deux-Eglises, but Colombey-les-Deux-Mosques. "

And stll it goes on.

http://waltwhitemansworld.blogspot.co.uk/2016/12/secret-refugee-deal-to-bring-2500.html

 

  • Members
Posted (edited)

You know for a long time, since 911, I have been an advocate of deporting every single Muslim from our country. And it just dawned on me: if we started doing that, surely we would have a "civil war" on our hands.

Edited by heartstrings
  • Moderators
Posted
On ‎12‎/‎20‎/‎2016 at 11:42 AM, heartstrings said:

You know for a long time, since 911, I have been an advocate of deporting every single Muslim from our country. And it just dawned on me: if we started doing that, surely we would have a "civil war" on our hands.

You know, we really can't do that, due to the first ammendment of the Constitution. Now certainly, we can vet them before allowing them in, and so we should have always done, and if there is no way to successfully vet them to ensure they aren't tied to terrorism, we just don't let them in. But while here, we can't deport them merely for their religion, it is against the law of the land. Now, those here tied to terrorism, (yes I know many would say to be muslim IS to be tied to terrorism), then that can be used as a reason for deportation. But there are Muslims who love the country and obey the laws-and we should be giving them the gospel.

  • 1 month later...
  • Members
Posted

I read recently that 50% of Germany is no longer German. It is well known that there is a concerted effort in that nation to not only emasculate the white male population (Matthew 12:29) but also to completely breed out the white population there. This is not "white nationalist" propaganda either but has been openly admitted by their own politicians and leaders (whom the majority are women) many of whom support this policy. Like Harvard trained professor Noel Ignatiev has stated, " The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists."

  • Members
Posted
1 hour ago, fastjav390 said:

Like Harvard trained professor Noel Ignatiev has stated, " The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists."

Hmmm...I'm a white man.

  • Members
Posted
16 hours ago, 1Timothy115 said:

Hmmm...I'm a white man.

Then the good professor wants you gone. Unless your are a white woman then you are only good for breeding with black or brown men. I'm not making this up and this is becoming common teaching in Universities.

  • Members
Posted

The Mohammeden religion is at odds with America's Declaration of Independence and her Constitution.  So is Socialism and Communism.  These three political movements, as history has shown, have only served their own ends and not supported the Constitution.  These three have subverted American values and contributed to her moral decay faster than anything else.  These three are tools of the devil.  They have no place in American society.

Having said that, it is not a violation of the First Amendment if a Mohammden refuses to pledge allegiance to the United States of America to not grant them citizenship.  During the War of Northern Aggression, Communists came to America and fought for the Yankees but remained underground until the early 20th Century.  Once the rest of America saw what a menace and threat to freedom they were, they were beaten, jailed and deported at every opportunity until enough of them had infiltrated the Democrat Party and somehow became legitimized.  The Muhammadens have done the same thing since 9-11.   

Remember folks, the Muhammaden religion is really a political movement under the guise of religion.  It seeks to subvert, not uphold the societies it infiltrates.  It is as Un-American as Communism and Socialism and is indeed why the Democrat Party has embraced it.  All three shake their fists at God and persecute those who love Jesus Christ.  

  • Members
Posted

I try not to comment on US politics, although I slip sometimes.  

However I must disagree with the above post.  The US downturn began in the 1800s when she allowed multitudes of Catholics into the country.  Many of these got top jobs and bcame leaders of the Cia and other organisations, press etc.

  • Members
Posted
16 minutes ago, Invicta said:

I try not to comment on US politics, although I slip sometimes.  

However I must disagree with the above post.  The US downturn began in the 1800s when she allowed multitudes of Catholics into the country.  Many of these got top jobs and bcame leaders of the Cia and other organisations, press etc.

HA, now that is a good point that I have never considered.

  • Members
Posted (edited)
6 hours ago, swathdiver said:

The Mohammeden religion is at odds with America's Declaration of Independence and her Constitution.  So is Socialism and Communism.  These three political movements, as history has shown, have only served their own ends and not supported the Constitution.  These three have subverted American values and contributed to her moral decay faster than anything else.  These three are tools of the devil.  They have no place in American society.

Having said that, it is not a violation of the First Amendment if a Mohammden refuses to pledge allegiance to the United States of America to not grant them citizenship.  During the War of Northern Aggression, Communists came to America and fought for the Yankees but remained underground until the early 20th Century.  Once the rest of America saw what a menace and threat to freedom they were, they were beaten, jailed and deported at every opportunity until enough of them had infiltrated the Democrat Party and somehow became legitimized.  The Muhammadens have done the same thing since 9-11.   

Remember folks, the Muhammaden religion is really a political movement under the guise of religion.  It seeks to subvert, not uphold the societies it infiltrates.  It is as Un-American as Communism and Socialism and is indeed why the Democrat Party has embraced it.  All three shake their fists at God and persecute those who love Jesus Christ.  

If a "Mohammden" or anyone else wants to become a citizen of the United States they must pledge allegiance to the Constitution.

Here's the Naturalization Oath of Allegiance to the United States:

"I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God."

Since 2015 under Obama they no longer have to take up arms during war time in defense of the US though.

I find your comment about Communists fighting for the Yankees a little laughable though. 

Edited by fastjav390
  • Members
Posted
7 hours ago, Invicta said:

However I must disagree with the above post.  The US downturn began in the 1800s when she allowed multitudes of Catholics into the country.  Many of these got top jobs and bcame leaders of the Cia and other organisations, press etc.

The CIA didn't come into existence until the conclusion of World War 2.  Many of those professing Catholics were also the Communists mentioned earlier; hellbound sinners needing salvation.

3 hours ago, fastjav390 said:

I find your comment about Communists fighting for the Yankees a little laughable though. 

Well then, you have much to learn on that subject.  Might I suggest the book, "Red Republicans and Lincoln's Marxists"?

  • Members
Posted
14 hours ago, swathdiver said:

The CIA didn't come into existence until the conclusion of World War 2.  Many of those professing Catholics were also the Communists mentioned earlier; hellbound sinners needing salvation.

Well then, you have much to learn on that subject.  Might I suggest the book, "Red Republicans and Lincoln's Marxists"?

Well I believe that the Vatican supported the South and the Pope addressed Jefferson Davis as "My beloved son."

  • Members
Posted
10 hours ago, Invicta said:

Well I believe that the Vatican supported the South and the Pope addressed Jefferson Davis as "My beloved son."

Curiously, how did President Davis respond?  How did the Vatican support the Confederacy?  I know nothing on this subject.

  • Members
Posted
5 hours ago, swathdiver said:

Curiously, how did President Davis respond?  How did the Vatican support the Confederacy?  I know nothing on this subject.

I can't remember.  I read it somewhere, possibly in one of the books by Avro Manhattan who was probably murdered by the RCs.  He wrote many books against Rome, the earliest I read was Vatican Imperialism In The 20th Century, published aboiut 1959. His death was recorded as suicide but there were doubts.

The Catholics certainly assasinated Lincoln after the war.

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...