Jump to content

Alan

Independent Fundamental Baptist
  • Content Count

    3,176
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    239

Alan last won the day on May 17

Alan had the most liked content!

About Alan

  • Rank
    Alan
  • Birthday 12/16/1952

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    Missouri - Taiwan
  • Denomination
    Baptist
  • IFB?
    Yes

Recent Profile Visitors

32,689 profile views
  1. DaChaser and Tyndale, John Young, and I, tried to show, politely and in Christian love and forbearance, the errors, corruption, and doctrinal changes of the NKJV, through the excellent video by Dr. Stauffer and we have been ignored by you and Tyndale. Instead of listening to the excellent teaching of Dr. Stauffer, and John Young and I, you and Tyndale have changed the subject and will not discuss the verses listed by Dr. Stauffer in Chapter 11 and 12 that he lists in the video. It is my thoughts that you, and brother Tyndale, came here on Online Baptist in order to create dissension and arguments and are not come on Online Baptist for honest, sincere Bible teaching. The apostle Paul stated, "For I fear, lest, when I come, I shall not find you such as I would not: lest there be debates, envyings, wraths, strifes, backbitings, whisperings, swellings, tumults." 2 Corinthians 12:20. Instead, you and Tyndale, thus far, are trying to cause the brethren here to doubt the veracity of the preservation of the scriptures, have a hatred towards the King James Version, disparage the those who use the KJV, libel those who disagree, and both of you want to cause debates, strife and tumults among us brethren. I have decided not to argue with either one of you. If you want to discuss, in an honest and Christian-like manner, my other Bible studies ( I have several here on Online Baptist), please do so. I would like to be your friend. But, I will not argue nor debate either one of you. Regards, Alan
  2. Brethren, In Dr. Stauffer's video he goes through Chapter 11, "They Call This New?" and Chapter 12, "No New Thing under the Sun," in his book, " One Book Stands Alone." Dr. Stauffer very carefully examines numerous verses of the KJV Bible with the NKJV, the NWT, the NCV, and the CEV. Dr. Stauffer clearly, very clearly, proves beyond a shadow of a doubt, the NKJV is comparable to the NIV, the NWT, the NCV and the CEV in numerous doctrinal and spiritual verses. The NKJV is not, repeat, is not, an updated King james Version. Dr. Stauffer states, "Thus began the "career" of one of the most insidious bibles ever to hit the market - the New King James Version," on page 167. Dr. Stauffer is correct, the New King James Version (NKJV), is insidious. As I stated before, our brother Tyndale ignores the comparison of these versions with the King James Version and tries other means to ignore Dr. Stauffer's par excellent teaching. Brother John Young did us a great service in uploading the video by Dr. Stauffer. We need to carefully listen to the video, take notes, and I would encourage all of my brethren to purchase the book. Alan
  3. Wait a minute my friend Tyndale. First of all, the NKJV states very clearly that it a new edition of the KJV and not a revised edition. Dr. Stauffer is comparing the KJV with NKJV and has clearly shown that they are different in doctrinal issues. Therefore, Dr. Stauffer, through his clear examples of the corruption and perversion of NKJV has shown that, as he mentioned in the video, the NKJV is "BLASPHEMOUS TRASH."
  4. The King James translators were entirely correct in translating Acts 3:13, 3:26, 4:27 and 4:30 as Son and Child.
  5. Interesting. Instead of commenting on the numerous, obvious, perversions, and corruptions of the NKJV text that Dr. Stauffer mentioned, and very clearly explained, both DaChaser and Tyndale just ignore them and will not quote the textual corruptions that Dr. Stauffer, mentioned. Nor, will they quote the examples of the NKJV perversions that David Sorenson, Laurence Vance, Joe Gresham mentioned. Hmmm??? Interesting. Why not look at the individual textual perversions that Dr. Stauffer mentioned instead of ignoring the verses mentioned?
  6. The US bill by Rep. Rush, HR6666, the 'Contact Tracing,' and the other items mentioned in the video I uploaded, are not nonsense. Once the governor of any state declares an 'medical emergency,' the Governor could, and would, make it all 'mandatory.' Also, as one example, if you look in the HR 6666 bill you read these words, " ... and related activities" can mean anything the health tester deems related; which includes quarantine where they deem necessary. Also, HR 6666 states," ...such as contact tracing." 'Contact Tracing' is insidious and the health tester can make any decision for any one of the individuals the person 'infected' had contact with. Also, the HR 666 is clear in its meaning the 'contact tracing' is only one example of the powers that the health person can use. Also, HR 6666 states, "...and for other purposes." That means that whatever purpose the person conducting the tests deems necessary to prevent the spread of the disease has the authority to whatever he deems necessary. All decisions are taken out of the hand of the individuals tested and the health tester makes the decision what to do. The entire video was a good video and not nonsense. In the last few months we have seen Governors of the States, local mayors, and medical personnel take away our Constitutional rights, force us to stay at home, force us to wear masks, force us to loose our jobs, and force churches to close due to a 'medical emergency.' "Contact Tracing' will enable local, untrained, medical personnel, come into our homes due to a 'medical emergency' and make whatever decision the deem necessary. No, the video was not nonsense, it is perfectly sensible, right, and correct in the dangers of HR 6666, and the other items in they video.
  7. The prophet Ezekiel prophesied, “Moreover, when ye shall divide by lot the land for inheritance, ye shall offer an oblation unto the LORD, an holy portion of the land: the length shall be the length of five and twenty thousand reeds, and the breadth shall be ten thousand. This shall be holy in all the borders thereof round about.” Ezekiel 45:1 The Lord is audibly explaining to the prophet Ezekiel how they should divide the land for the sanctuary of God and for the inheritance of the people. The ‘land’ is clearly physical land, it cannot be heaven, and it cannot be spiritual, and allegory nor a reference to the any ‘inheritance to church age saints. The ‘Inheritance’ of the Saints in the Church In speaking to the saints in Colosse, and therefore to all of the saints in the church age, the apostle Paul states, “And whatsoever ye do, do it heartily, as to the Lord, and not unto men; Knowing that of the Lord ye shall receive the reward of the inheritance: for ye serve the Lord Christ.” Colossians 3:23-24. If a saint in whatsoever he does, does it heartily as to the Lord, he will receive an inheritance. In the book of Ephesians chapter 1, the apostle Paul, among other spiritual truths, as an example, lets the saints in Ephesus know that the Holy Spirit, at the moment of salvation is the ‘earnest,’ or the down payment if you please, of our inheritance (Ephesians 1:13-14). The ‘earnest’ of the Holy Spirit to all saints in the Church Age is a ‘spiritual’ blessing. All of our blessings, all of the inheritance that Paul writes about in the book of Ephesians is ‘spiritual’ in ‘heavenly places. “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who hath blessed us with all spiritual blessings in heavenly places in Christ.” Ephesians 1:4 The apostle Peter clearly stated that the inheritance of the saints in the church are in heaven. “Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, To an inheritance incorruptible, and undefiled, and that fadeth not away, reserved in heaven for you.” 1 Peter 1:3-4 The ‘inheritance’ of the saints in the church are spiritual and in heaven. There are no physical promises of an inheritance of any kind, especially that of ‘land,’ to the saints in the church. Therefore, the ‘land’ as mentioned by the prophet Ezekiel is not for the church. Furthermore, the ‘land’ that Ezekiel is referring to is the physical land of Israel and the ‘ye’ is therefore the leaders of the nation of Israel.
  8. You need to watch this video. The WHO, George Soros, the Clinton's, the Communists, and many US governors, are using the COVID-19 pandemic to enact legislation to determine, with their own ideas, who is isolated, to come into homes to take away children from parents, and to force everyone to provide their daily contacts. These individuals and government representatives are using fear tactics to take away our personal freedoms, the freedom to worship and the freedoms within our very homes. Also, they absolutely do not care about our Bill of Rights nor the Constitution of the United States.
  9. Ezekiel 45:1-8, “The Dividing of the land of Israel According to the Tribes of Israel.” Introduction The context of Ezekiel 45:1-8 is within the context of the ‘visions of God’ starting in Ezekiel 40:1 and continuing to the end of the book of Ezekiel 48:35. The ‘visions of God’ in this complete section of Ezekiel of the Tabernacle are literal, and cannot be construed, or interpreted, in any allegorical sense of the word. Also, the description of the Tabernacle, the offerings, the Levites, the Prince, the ceremonies, the courts, have not been fulfilled in the building of the Temple as recorded in Ezra 6-10, nor can it be a description of Herod’s Temple, nor can it be the Temple built during the 7-Year Tribulation Period, nor in any physical, or spiritual, sense of the word since Ezekiel penned the prophecy. Therefore, the building of the Tabernacle as described by the prophecy of Ezekiel is future. Since the scripture is very clear that the Apostle John clearly states that in the New Jerusalem, and the New Earth, there is no temple. “And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God Almighty and the Lamb are the temple of it.” (Revelation 21:22). The only possible point in time, as far as the scriptures are concerned, that the prophecy of Ezekiel can be fulfilled as written, is during the 1000-Year Reign of Christ as depicted in Revelation 20:4-8.
  10. Yes. But, they just tend to argue, will not listen to reason, will not participate in other threads in a Christian manner.
  11. Brethren, I will try and upload a little at a time of the above addition on Charles Darwin and his errors. Alan
  12. Natural Selection & Cell Division The Theory of Evolution depends on the theory of ‘Natural Selection,’ or, ‘The Survival of the Fittest,’ as theorized by Charles Darwin in his book, ‘The Origin of Species.’ ‘Natural Selection,’ or, ‘The Survival of the Fittest,’ is where all species (whether man or animal), adapt to its surroundings, to evolve to a higher form of life and the weakest is destroyed. We need to explain Darwin's word of ‘segments’ in his theory. ‘Segments’ to Darwin are the segment so a plant, and the internal and external organs, the eyes, the ears, the jaws, the arms and feet, of insects and animals. Thus, in the process of ‘Natural Selection,’ or the evolutionary process: the development of the internal and external organs, arms, legs, of an animal to a person.
  13. Thank you for informing us of the passing of Ravi Zacharias.
  14. Brethren, I will be adding the following quote by Charles Darwin, 'The Origin of Species," in the lesson on, "The Desolation of Life on Other Planets." Alan The Odd Theological (Incorrect) Belief of Darwin In Genesis 1:20-22 and 24-25 it is very obvious that the species of plants, trees, aquatic animals, the fowls of the air, and the insects and animal species were spoken by God (audibly), into existence. God did not use any form of matter, including the dust of the ground, to create the aquatic, animal, insect, fowl, and animal species. The only species of life on the face of the earth made by the dust of the ground was man: Adam. “And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.” Genesis 2:7 Besides his biological scientific errors concerning the cell division of plants, insects, animals and humans, in his book, “The Origin of Species,” Charles Darwin makes an odd theological error in the Genesis account of the creation of the species of the world. In his rambling discourse railing against those who believe in the biblical account of a separate creation of the species of the world, Darwin states, “Under a scientific point of view, and as leading to further investigation, but little advantage is gained by believing that new forms are suddenly developed in an inexplicable manner from old and widely different forms, over the old belief in the creation of species from the dust of the earth.”1 God clearly spoke the plant, aquatic creatures, fowl, and animal, species by audible voice, into existence and man, Adam by the dust of the earth. 1 Darwin, Charles, The Origin of Species, (New York, NY: Penguin Group, 2003), p. 454.
  15. Brethren, I will be adding the following quotation to my study on, "Chapter 1 The Ordinances of Heaven." Any questions? Comments? God bless all of you! Alan Concerning the ordinances of heaven and the dominion of the earth, God asks Job this question, “Knowest thou the ordinances of heaven? canst thou set the dominion thereof in the earth?” Job 38:33. The American Heritage Dictionary’s primary and secondary definition of the word ‘set’ is: “1. To put in a specified position or arrangement. 2. To put in a specified state.” 1 Obviously, Job did not either know the ‘ordinances,’ or, ‘laws,’ governing the heavens nor set these laws. Job did not, ‘put in a specified position or arrangement’ nor ‘put in a specified state’ the ordinances of heaven nor ‘set’ the ordinances concerning the arrangement of the earth, the scientific laws concerning the earth nor the scientific laws governing the earth. The ‘dominion,’ of these ordinances in the earth and all of the ordinances of the heavens, and the earth, and the dominion, the ownership thereof, of the heavens and the earth, are ‘set,’ or, ‘put in a specified position or arrangement’ and ‘put in a specified state’ by God Himself. The greatest scientist that has every lived, Isaac Newton, wrote, “And from his true dominion it follows that the true God is a living, intelligent, and powerful Being; and, from his other perfections, that he is supreme, or most perfect. He is eternal and infinite, omnipotent and omniscient; that is, his duration reaches from eternity to eternity; his presence from infinity to infinity; he governs all things, and knows all things, that are or can be done.”2 The Psalmist stated, “Bless the LORD, all his works in all places of his dominion: bless the LORD, O my soul.” Psalm 103:22 1 The American Heritage Language Dictionary, 5th ed., s. v. Set, (New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt). 2012. 2Newton, Isaac, Newton’s Principia. The Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, trans. Andrew Motte (New York: Daniel Adee, 1846), 505.

Article Categories

About Us

Since 2001, Online Baptist has been an Independent Baptist website, and we exclusively use the King James Version of the Bible. We pride ourselves on a community that uplifts the Lord.

Contact Us

You can contact us using the following link. Contact Us or for questions regarding this website please contact @pastormatt or email James Foley at jfoley@sisqtel.net

Android App

Online Baptist has a custom App for all android users. You can download it from the Google Play store or click the following icon.

×
×
  • Create New...