Jump to content
Online Baptist

Ukulelemike

Moderators
  • Content Count

    4,414
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    174

Ukulelemike last won the day on June 30

Ukulelemike had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About Ukulelemike

  • Rank
    Just a Servant
  • Birthday November 11

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location:
    NE California
  • Denomination
    Independent Fundamental Baptist
  • IFB?
    Yes

Recent Profile Visitors

17,132 profile views
  1. There is a man named William Schnobelen, (pronounced "Shneblin"), He was a high-degree Mason in the European rite, which goes to I believe level 99. He was also a practicing witch. He did a lot of very crazy, almost fake-sounding stuff, but he seems extremely sincere-practiced vampirism, and was ordained a black bishop in the Catholic church. He got out of it all, actually, through joining the Mormons, but as he was seeking truth, he was drawn to the KJB Bible over their other books, and was actually kicked out because it was all he would read and teach from. He got saved and left it all behi
  2. Correct. Personally, I call it post-trib, because I see a significant difference between the 'tribulation' and the 'wrath', the tribulation occurring before the falling of God's wrath. In the tribulation, while God controls all that happens, yet Satan also is given (controlled) free reign to persecute Israel and any believers present. But when God's wrath falls, Satan and the Antichrist and their followers are directly punished by God's wrath, and they no longer have power. And as for how long each takes to happen, the Bible isn't clear, which is why I can still see us not know WHEN Chri
  3. Welcome aboard the board. Hope we won't leave you bored.
  4. Thank you. Believe. Faith. Period.
  5. Here is some more: "O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not! Behold, your house is left unto you desolate. " (Matt 23:37) Here we see God's will, that He could gather Jerusalem together to Himself, yet their will, to reject Him, prevailed, and therefore, their house was left to them desolate. Man's will prevailed over God's will. "The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slac
  6. "For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do shew the Lord's death till he come. " (1Cor 11:23-16) Okay, scripture clearly sho
  7. Konstantin, while much of the things you post are veritable gobbelty-gook, because you patch together bits and pieces of verses and phrases that often have nothing to do with each other, so as to make your case seem biblical, yet it borders on, if not being outright, heresy. You create doctrines out of patchwork, then declare this to be truth. Your understanding of scripture is severely flawed. I don't know who taught you to rightly divide scripture this way, but you need to read and understand scripture according to context. Your verse given above has nothing to do with salvation by gra
  8. But where there is no law, or understanding of sin and punishment, there is no imputing of sin. All are fallen, but until sin is willingly committed, it is not imputed. That is exactly what Paul was saying in Rom 7.
  9. You can say that as you like, but that is certainly adding to what scripture says. It says just what it says, we need not add man made philosophy to it. They are not elect in Christ, they are in innocence, where there is no law, and sin is not accounted.
  10. Paul covers this issue quite competently and clearly, in Romans 7: "What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet. But sin, taking occasion by the commandment, wrought in me all manner of concupiscence. For without the law sin was dead. For I was alive without the law once: but when the commandment came, sin revived, and I died. And the commandment, which was ordained to life, I found to be unto death." The highlighted area seems quite clear to me: The only was so
  11. I admit that I have often wondered what language the original original was written in. I hold to, though not dogmatically, the idea that from Adam, God's word was written and compiled, by Adam, Cain, Seth, Noah, maybe others, not sure, and passed down from Noah, through Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and held until Moses compiled them all into the Pentateuch. Of course, Moses could have been given it all by direct revelation from God, but somehow I think it may have been otherwise. And if so, what language did Adam use? Was it all, for 1600 years, pressed into clay as cuneiform? Did they develop be
  12. You Do know that the reason they changed the spelling in later editions is because at one time there was no set spelling, so it would change from time to time, depending on who wrote it. But in reality, the name "Passover" was invented by Tyndale, because there was no English translation of the Hebrew 'Pesach.' He called it that sine it was when the Lord passed over the houses with the blood. But it just seems to me if you're going to be a stickler over spelling, why not just go all the way?
  13. If we feel the need for the old spelling, why not call it Pesach?
  14. Well, they're all using the same source material, and unless the other pastor is copyrighting all his material, (a terrible idea anyways), as long as the sermons are good and biblically sound, I don't know that it is a problem, ethically. Now, if he is a full-time pastor, with plenty of time to prepare sermons, and he is being paid to do that, but all he does is use others' sermons, then maybe that ought to be taken up as to whether he is doing his job. But I doubt there are any pastors who haven't used other pastors' sermons before. Even Charles Spurgeon admitted to preaching Matthew Hen
×
×
  • Create New...