Food for thought ....

[Truthseeking]

Being the car guy I am, found something BroMatt wrote some months back interesting.......

I went to a car show and saw a 1951 Crosley in mint condition. Through the life of this car it has had some revisions done. It has had a new paint job, the interior has had some work done, the engine oil has been replaced quite a few times, the exhaust pipes were changed to nice looking chrome, and many other revisions were done to the car. And yet it was still being advertised as a 1951 car. SHOCK!!!!

How come nobody complained that it is false advertising for the car? But yet when it comes to the Bible people will say "you are not a KJV 1611 guy?".

It is just a another sad excuse to discredit the the Authorized Version of the Bible. I know that what I have in my hands is not an "original" but rather a copy, but I do know and can honestly say that I hold Gods preserved Words for the language that I speak even though it has went through minor language revisions.

Your logic does not fit. As for the added books, you must be talking about the Apocrypha. Notice where they were placed in the Bible, carefully placed in between the Old and New Testament. They were placed there for historical records. A simple study will show you that. You have maps/concordance/notes in your Bible? I sure hope you do not think that those are added books as far as Preservation goes.

You are also wrong about the 1800 revision. From 1769, the text of the Authorized Version has remained unchanged.

Just something to think on......