Members heartstrings Posted January 10, 2008 Members Share Posted January 10, 2008 JAHinton is now also my new best friend. That's a root argument, that many people need to understand. The evidence for George Washington is even weaker then sea serpents, given that we have people today who say they have seen them, and no one today says they have seen george Washington. I do point out some times, how people will trust someone in NASA about what they think some planet 10,000,000 light years away is like, but won't trust someone they know about something they saw in the ocean. Photographic evindence for "sea serpents" Nobody living to day has seen the Lord Jesus Christ either. There is far more credible evidence for George Washington than all the cryptozooligic "evidence". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members CJP56 Posted January 10, 2008 Members Share Posted January 10, 2008 When Thor Heyerdahl crossed the Pacific Ocean on a raft in 1947, a fish called a Gempylus jumped on board one night. It was so unusual looking they kept it and when they got back to civilization, the scientists were astounded to see it. They exclaimed that it wasn't possible, because that particular kind of fish had been extinct for millions of years. It is absolutely mind boggling what we don't know about what is under the sea. If the scientists want to get on a personal basis with what is out there, they should really try crossing the ocean on a raft. Oh yes, the scientists also were convinced that no one could cross the ocean on a raft. I firmly believe there are and have been all kinds of sea serpents. CJP56 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members heartstrings Posted January 10, 2008 Members Share Posted January 10, 2008 The coelacanth was another paleofish, supposed to be extinct millions of years ago. It also has been found alive and well.There have been recent discoveries of giant squid, megamouth sharks, and wierd creatures living around deep ocean vents. But the only "serpents" I know about are sea snakes like the one in the picure. Why not use the term "previously unknown creature" or "newly discovered species" instead of "sea serpent"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JAHinton Posted January 10, 2008 Members Share Posted January 10, 2008 The evolutionist have told us that the pectoral fins were in the process of becoming legs. But ONE guess what they still are :clap: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members heartstrings Posted January 10, 2008 Members Share Posted January 10, 2008 That's right! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members qwerty guy Posted March 8, 2008 Author Members Share Posted March 8, 2008 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members godsgurlie_077 Posted March 8, 2008 Members Share Posted March 8, 2008 Wow, this is an intresting topic it is very educational I don't even have to watch the discovery channel Yay no T.V. needed again :smile Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.