Jump to content
Online Baptist Community
  • Newest Sermon Entry

    • By Jim_Alaska in Jim_Alaska's Sermons & Devotionals
         14
      Closed Communion
      James Foley
       
      I Corinthians 11:17-34: "Now in this that I declare unto you I praise you not, that ye come together not for the better, but for the worse. For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly believe it. For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you. When ye come together therefore into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's Supper. For in eating every one taketh before other his own supper: and one is hungry, and another is drunken. What? have ye not houses to eat and to drink in? or despise ye the church of God, and shame them that have not? What shall I say to you? shall I praise you in this? I praise you not. For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do show the Lord's death till he come. Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup. For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body. For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world. Wherefore, my brethren, when ye come together to eat, tarry one for another. And if any man hunger, let him eat at home; that ye come not together unto condemnation. And the rest will I set in order when I come."

      INTRODUCTION

      Historic Baptists, true Baptists, have believed in and still believe in closed communion. Baptists impose upon themselves the same restrictions that they impose on others concerning the Lord’s Supper. Baptists have always insisted that it is the Lord’s Table, not theirs; and He alone has the right to say who shall sit at His table. No amount of so called brotherly love, or ecumenical spirit, should cause us to invite to His table those who have not complied with the requirements laid down plainly in His inspired Word. With respect to Bible doctrines we must always use the scripture as our guide and practice. For Baptists, two of the most important doctrines are Baptism and The Lord’s Supper. These are the only two doctrines we recognize as Church Ordinances. The Bible is very clear in teaching how these doctrines are to be practiced and by whom.

      We only have two ordinances that we must never compromise or we risk our very existence, they are Baptism and The Lord’s Supper.

      The moment we deviate from the precise method God has prescribed we have started down the slippery slope of error. True Baptists have held fast to the original doctrine of The Lord’s Supper from the time of Christ and the Apostles.

      Unfortunately, in this day of what the Bible describes as the age of luke warmness, Baptists are becoming careless in regard to strictly following the pattern laid out for us in Scripture. Many of our Bible colleges are graduating otherwise sincere, Godly and dedicated pastors and teachers who have not been taught the very strict, biblical requirements that surround the Lord’s Supper. Any Bible college that neglects to teach its students the differences surrounding Closed Communion, Close Communion and Open Communion is not simply short changing its students; it is also not equipping their students to carry on sound Bible traditions. The result is men of God and churches that fall into error. And as we will see, this is serious error.

      Should we as Baptists ignore the restrictions made by our Lord and Master? NO! When we hold to the restrictions placed upon the Lord’s Supper by our Master, we are defending the "faith which was once delivered to the saints" Jude 3.

      The Lord’s Supper is rigidly restricted and I will show this in the following facts:

      IT IS RESTRICTED AS TO PLACE

      A. I Corinthians 11:18 says, "When ye come together in the church." This does not mean the church building; they had none. In other words, when the church assembles. The supper is to be observed by the church, in church capacity. Again this does not mean the church house. Ekklesia, the Greek word for church, means assembly. "When ye come together in the church," is when the church assembles.

      B. When we say church we mean an assembly of properly baptized believers. Acts 2:41-42: "Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls. And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers."

      The church is made up of saved people who are baptized by immersion. In the Bible, belief precedes baptism. That’s the Bible way.

      Acts 8:12-13, "But when they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women. Then Simon himself believed also: and when he was baptized, he continued with Philip, and wondered, beholding the miracles and signs which were done."

      When we say properly baptized, we mean immersed. No unbeliever should take the Lord’s supper, and no non-immersed believer should take the supper. Those who are sprinkled are not baptized and cannot receive the supper. The Greek word for baptize is baptizo, and it always means to immerse.

      "In every case where communion is referred to, or where it may possibly have been administered, the believers had been baptized Acts 2:42; 8:12; 8:38; 10:47; 6:14-15; 18:8; 20:7. Baptism comes before communion, just as repentance and faith precede baptism".

      C. The Lord’s Supper is for baptized believers in church capacity: "When ye come together in the church," again not a building, but the assembly of the properly baptized believers.

      D. The fact that the Lord’s Supper is a church ordinance, to be observed in church capacity, is pointed out by the fact that it is for those who have been immersed and added to the fellowship of the church.

      E. The Lord’s Supper is never spoken of in connection with individuals. When it is referred to, it is only referred to in reference to baptized believers in local church capacity I Cor. 11:20-26).

      I want to quote Dr. W.W. Hamilton,

      "The individual administration of the ordinance has no Bible warrant and is a relic of Romanism. The Lord’s Supper is a church ordinance, and anything which goes beyond or comes short of this fails for want of scriptural example or command".

      “The practice of taking a little communion kit to hospitals, nursing homes, etc. is unscriptural and does not follow the scriptural example.”

      IT IS RESTRICTED TO A UNITED CHURCH

      A. The Bible in I Cor. 11:18 is very strong in condemning divisions around the Lord’s table. For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly believe it.
      19 For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you.
      20 When ye come together therefore into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's supper.

      There were no less than four divisions in the Corinthian church.
      I Cor. 1:12: "Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ."

      Because of these divisions, it was impossible for them to scripturally eat the Lord’s Supper. Division in the local church is reason to hold off observing the Lord’s Supper. But there are also other reasons to forego taking the Lord’s Supper. If there is gross sin in the membership we do not take it. Here is scriptural evidence for this: 1Co 5:7 Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our Passover is sacrificed for us:
      8 Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. 9 I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators:
      10 Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world. 11 But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.

      B. At this point, I want to ask these questions: Are there not doctrinal divisions among the many denominations? Is it not our doctrinal differences that cause us to be separate religious bodies?

      IT IS RESTRICTED BY DOCTRINE

      A. Those in the early church at Jerusalem who partook "continued stedfastly in the apostles’ doctrine" Acts 2:42. And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.

      B. Those that do not hold to apostolic truth are not to partake. This means there is to be discipline in the local body. How can you discipline those who do not belong to the local body? You can’t. The clear command of scripture is to withdraw fellowship from those who are not doctrinally sound.

      II Thes 3:6: "Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us."
      Rom. 16:17: "Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them."
      To commune together means to have the same doctrine.
      II Thes. 2:15: "Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle."
      II John 10-11: "If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds."

      C. Some Baptists in our day have watered down this doctrine by practicing what they call “Close Communion.” By this they mean that they believe that members of another Baptist church may take communion with us because they are of the same beliefs. Once again, this is unscriptural.

      The welcome to the Lord's Table should not be extended beyond the discipline of the local church. When we take the Lord’s Supper there is supposed to be no gross sin among us and no divisions among us. We have no idea of the spiritual condition of another church’s members. If there is sin or division in the case of this other church’s members, we have no way of knowing it. We cannot discipline them because they are not members of our church. This is why we practice “Closed” communion, meaning it is restricted solely to our church membership. 
      So then, in closing I would like to reiterate the three different ideas concerning the Lord’s Supper and who is to take it. 
      Closed Communion = Only members of a single local church. 
      Close Communion = Members of like faith and order may partake. 
      Open Communion = If you claim to be a Christian, or simply attending the service, you may partake. 
      It is no small thing to attempt to change that which was implemented by our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. 
      Mt. 28:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen. 
      Many of our Baptist churches have a real need to consider the gravity of the act of observing The Lord’s Supper. It is not a light thing that is to be taken casually or without regard to the spiritual condition of ourselves or our church.
      1Co. 11:27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.

       28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.

       29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.

       30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.

Landmark Baptist Curriculum


Pastorj
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

I was talking to an individual who uses this curriculum. They told me that they spend about a 1/2 hour per day on school to complete all of the work for the 10th grade curriculum.

Anyone using this curriculum out there that can tell me if this is how long it should take?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member

I don't use it so don't ban me for replying, please. :Green


I googled it and it appears to be similar to ACE paces. The way the products look and their cost make me think that.

IF it is like Paces, maybe this person does 2 pages a day per subject and just finishes quickly? Not a very comprehensive education, IMO...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lady Administrators

I never taught using this, but I did teach ACE for a time. They are very similar, but Landmark is Baptist by distinction. IMO, 1/2 hour per day for 10th grade is not enough time for what they need to learn - in any curriculum!!! Granted, homeschooling can enable students to learn more quickly than in a traditional classroom, but not that fast!!

My parents had my nephew in a school that used that curriculum...and ended up really not liking it because there were several mistakes in it. They claim they will correct them, maybe they will. But a truly professional work would be proofed plenty before sending out. I'm not talking printing errors. I'm talking factual errors. Not good in a curriculum.

My nephew is now in the School of Tomorrow (ACE) at home. He is in 11th grade, and it takes him all morning to do his work. He works steadily at it, too. Sometimes, when there is a project, it will take him a bit longer (It was the same last year for him). That is about the right length of time for that style of learning, IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The school at my church used that curriculum for one year, but there were too many educational issues in it so they switched to Abeka.

Supposedly, it requires the child to write more of their own answers (write a paragraph about what you think, etc.), but that often leads to laziness by both the teacher and the child because the Score Key tells the teacher to score it based on what they think (since obviously the Score Key doesn't know what the child is going to write on his own). I've seen teachers and students get so frustrated with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Based on my own experience dealing with tests' date=' I can't stand stand it when there aren't clear-cut answers to problems. So I can understand the teachers' frustration with it since I've experienced it myself.[/quote']

You wouldn't like Landmark Baptist Curriculum anyway, for the same reason I don't like it (if you set aside the style it's written... which could be improved in the future).

It puts WAY too much emphasis on the name BAPTIST. It's very Landmarkist.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the churches we used to go to ,used the Bible curriculium .They liked it ,very much so I know that much .

I did go to a school that used the curriculiam before Landmark bought them out .When I had to use it ,it was not like ACE at all .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

We tried it for 2 years (1993-1995) (before that we used ACE). It requires a lot of writing on the part of the student. Our children worked in it 6 hours a day and still had trouble completing all of the assignments. We went back to ACE until we found Switched-on Schoolhouse. We use ACE for 1st and 2nd grades and then Switched-on Schoolhouse for grades 3 - 12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

We tried it about 10 years ago for a semester when the church/school I was at was falling apart. So it could have changed by now. But at that time, when we (as teachers) got all the stuff in the mail, and I started looking through the books, I was frankly appalled. I thought at the time that it was pretty lame and did not look like a decent education. However that was over 10 years ago now so it could be better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member

I looked at it when deciding what to use 7or 8 yrs ago b/c it was cheap. I got there sample and was not at all happy with what I saw. Then we were offered a teaching position a while back and 1 reason among many that we didn't take the job was that they used this cirriculum and saw no need to change, but were concerned with the 'money' part. This is a you get what you pay for cirriculum.imho :bonK:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

We used some subjects from this curriculum, also. I found many typographical and mathematical errors, in the answer keys and some in the texts. If you're not a Baptist I can understand your not liking that emphasis, but that didn't bother me at all. This curriculum is definitely Bible-based and adheres to KJV-only. That part I liked. That being said, I really preferred other curriculum over theirs. And, as much as I like Pilgrim's Progress, they have a literature course which takes the whole year to cover it. I just couldn't see spending an entire school year on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

I have taught using this curriculum before and my opinion will pretty much echo many of the others here. I found numerous errors in practically every subject from printing errors to factual errors to the answer keys not agreeing with the curriculum. The bad part was that I even found factual errors in some of the Bible curriculum. As has been mentioned it is definitely a "you get what you pay for." There are much better curriculums out there that you may have to pay more for, but it will be worth it.

In Christ,
PreacherE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 13 years later...
  • Members
Posted (edited)
On 2/22/2008 at 9:52 AM, Pastorj said:

I was talking to an individual who uses this curriculum. They told me that they spend about a 1/2 hour per day on school to complete all of the work for the 10th grade curriculum.

Anyone using this curriculum out there that can tell me if this is how long it should take?

From reviews here in this thread,  it is not a real good investment,  but still may be a lot better that public school.   One very good curriculum with over 20 years successful reviews,  and being the most in line with the Bible instructions for bringing up a child in the way that he should go that I have seen,   takes half hour a day for the parent/ guardian to prepare lessons/outline/ activity for their children (one to twelve children),  and the children progress at their own rate but are not idle during 'class time'.

They have exceeded all other opportunities in most or all ways,  including testing for college and succeeding at college or higher education.

On 4/14/2008 at 1:22 PM, PreacherE said:

There are much better curriculums out there that you may have to pay more for, but it will be worth it.

In Christ,

The best by far that I have seen is the Robinson Curriculum (very helpful support/information forum is available via web) . RC  is available now for mac as well as windows,  and perhaps even cell phone downloads,  and to print.  (it is not meant to be conducted nor worked on in front of a screen - material is printed).

Edited by jeff_student_of_Jesus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
On 2/22/2008 at 10:52 AM, Pastorj said:

I was talking to an individual who uses this curriculum. They told me that they spend about a 1/2 hour per day on school to complete all of the work for the 10th grade curriculum.

Anyone using this curriculum out there that can tell me if this is how long it should take?

 

My son has attended our IFB Private School since Pre K and is going into sixth grade this year. The school uses mostly curriculum from BJU Press and A Beka Book but I'm really not sure if they use them for every subject. I am not sure about the Mathematic books but I'm certain they use the christian curriculum for Science, History, and obviously their bible studies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 12 Guests (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...