Jump to content
Online Baptist Community
  • Newest Sermon Entry

    • By Jim_Alaska in Jim_Alaska's Sermons & Devotionals
         14
      Closed Communion
      James Foley
       
      I Corinthians 11:17-34: "Now in this that I declare unto you I praise you not, that ye come together not for the better, but for the worse. For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly believe it. For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you. When ye come together therefore into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's Supper. For in eating every one taketh before other his own supper: and one is hungry, and another is drunken. What? have ye not houses to eat and to drink in? or despise ye the church of God, and shame them that have not? What shall I say to you? shall I praise you in this? I praise you not. For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do show the Lord's death till he come. Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup. For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body. For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world. Wherefore, my brethren, when ye come together to eat, tarry one for another. And if any man hunger, let him eat at home; that ye come not together unto condemnation. And the rest will I set in order when I come."

      INTRODUCTION

      Historic Baptists, true Baptists, have believed in and still believe in closed communion. Baptists impose upon themselves the same restrictions that they impose on others concerning the Lord’s Supper. Baptists have always insisted that it is the Lord’s Table, not theirs; and He alone has the right to say who shall sit at His table. No amount of so called brotherly love, or ecumenical spirit, should cause us to invite to His table those who have not complied with the requirements laid down plainly in His inspired Word. With respect to Bible doctrines we must always use the scripture as our guide and practice. For Baptists, two of the most important doctrines are Baptism and The Lord’s Supper. These are the only two doctrines we recognize as Church Ordinances. The Bible is very clear in teaching how these doctrines are to be practiced and by whom.

      We only have two ordinances that we must never compromise or we risk our very existence, they are Baptism and The Lord’s Supper.

      The moment we deviate from the precise method God has prescribed we have started down the slippery slope of error. True Baptists have held fast to the original doctrine of The Lord’s Supper from the time of Christ and the Apostles.

      Unfortunately, in this day of what the Bible describes as the age of luke warmness, Baptists are becoming careless in regard to strictly following the pattern laid out for us in Scripture. Many of our Bible colleges are graduating otherwise sincere, Godly and dedicated pastors and teachers who have not been taught the very strict, biblical requirements that surround the Lord’s Supper. Any Bible college that neglects to teach its students the differences surrounding Closed Communion, Close Communion and Open Communion is not simply short changing its students; it is also not equipping their students to carry on sound Bible traditions. The result is men of God and churches that fall into error. And as we will see, this is serious error.

      Should we as Baptists ignore the restrictions made by our Lord and Master? NO! When we hold to the restrictions placed upon the Lord’s Supper by our Master, we are defending the "faith which was once delivered to the saints" Jude 3.

      The Lord’s Supper is rigidly restricted and I will show this in the following facts:

      IT IS RESTRICTED AS TO PLACE

      A. I Corinthians 11:18 says, "When ye come together in the church." This does not mean the church building; they had none. In other words, when the church assembles. The supper is to be observed by the church, in church capacity. Again this does not mean the church house. Ekklesia, the Greek word for church, means assembly. "When ye come together in the church," is when the church assembles.

      B. When we say church we mean an assembly of properly baptized believers. Acts 2:41-42: "Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls. And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers."

      The church is made up of saved people who are baptized by immersion. In the Bible, belief precedes baptism. That’s the Bible way.

      Acts 8:12-13, "But when they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women. Then Simon himself believed also: and when he was baptized, he continued with Philip, and wondered, beholding the miracles and signs which were done."

      When we say properly baptized, we mean immersed. No unbeliever should take the Lord’s supper, and no non-immersed believer should take the supper. Those who are sprinkled are not baptized and cannot receive the supper. The Greek word for baptize is baptizo, and it always means to immerse.

      "In every case where communion is referred to, or where it may possibly have been administered, the believers had been baptized Acts 2:42; 8:12; 8:38; 10:47; 6:14-15; 18:8; 20:7. Baptism comes before communion, just as repentance and faith precede baptism".

      C. The Lord’s Supper is for baptized believers in church capacity: "When ye come together in the church," again not a building, but the assembly of the properly baptized believers.

      D. The fact that the Lord’s Supper is a church ordinance, to be observed in church capacity, is pointed out by the fact that it is for those who have been immersed and added to the fellowship of the church.

      E. The Lord’s Supper is never spoken of in connection with individuals. When it is referred to, it is only referred to in reference to baptized believers in local church capacity I Cor. 11:20-26).

      I want to quote Dr. W.W. Hamilton,

      "The individual administration of the ordinance has no Bible warrant and is a relic of Romanism. The Lord’s Supper is a church ordinance, and anything which goes beyond or comes short of this fails for want of scriptural example or command".

      “The practice of taking a little communion kit to hospitals, nursing homes, etc. is unscriptural and does not follow the scriptural example.”

      IT IS RESTRICTED TO A UNITED CHURCH

      A. The Bible in I Cor. 11:18 is very strong in condemning divisions around the Lord’s table. For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly believe it.
      19 For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you.
      20 When ye come together therefore into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's supper.

      There were no less than four divisions in the Corinthian church.
      I Cor. 1:12: "Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ."

      Because of these divisions, it was impossible for them to scripturally eat the Lord’s Supper. Division in the local church is reason to hold off observing the Lord’s Supper. But there are also other reasons to forego taking the Lord’s Supper. If there is gross sin in the membership we do not take it. Here is scriptural evidence for this: 1Co 5:7 Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our Passover is sacrificed for us:
      8 Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. 9 I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators:
      10 Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world. 11 But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.

      B. At this point, I want to ask these questions: Are there not doctrinal divisions among the many denominations? Is it not our doctrinal differences that cause us to be separate religious bodies?

      IT IS RESTRICTED BY DOCTRINE

      A. Those in the early church at Jerusalem who partook "continued stedfastly in the apostles’ doctrine" Acts 2:42. And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.

      B. Those that do not hold to apostolic truth are not to partake. This means there is to be discipline in the local body. How can you discipline those who do not belong to the local body? You can’t. The clear command of scripture is to withdraw fellowship from those who are not doctrinally sound.

      II Thes 3:6: "Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us."
      Rom. 16:17: "Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them."
      To commune together means to have the same doctrine.
      II Thes. 2:15: "Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle."
      II John 10-11: "If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds."

      C. Some Baptists in our day have watered down this doctrine by practicing what they call “Close Communion.” By this they mean that they believe that members of another Baptist church may take communion with us because they are of the same beliefs. Once again, this is unscriptural.

      The welcome to the Lord's Table should not be extended beyond the discipline of the local church. When we take the Lord’s Supper there is supposed to be no gross sin among us and no divisions among us. We have no idea of the spiritual condition of another church’s members. If there is sin or division in the case of this other church’s members, we have no way of knowing it. We cannot discipline them because they are not members of our church. This is why we practice “Closed” communion, meaning it is restricted solely to our church membership. 
      So then, in closing I would like to reiterate the three different ideas concerning the Lord’s Supper and who is to take it. 
      Closed Communion = Only members of a single local church. 
      Close Communion = Members of like faith and order may partake. 
      Open Communion = If you claim to be a Christian, or simply attending the service, you may partake. 
      It is no small thing to attempt to change that which was implemented by our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. 
      Mt. 28:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen. 
      Many of our Baptist churches have a real need to consider the gravity of the act of observing The Lord’s Supper. It is not a light thing that is to be taken casually or without regard to the spiritual condition of ourselves or our church.
      1Co. 11:27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.

       28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.

       29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.

       30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.

What Trump Got Right


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, PastorMatt said:

I don't need news articles to tell me what our presidents are doing right or wrong. I compare what they are doing to the Word of God. The Bible is our standard for good, not Fox News, CNN, MSNB, Newsmax and other news outlets.

But do you not need to know what was done so you can compare their deeds to the Bible?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
8 minutes ago, Jim_Alaska said:

Jeff, the board rules state that if you quote or post Scripture, you do it from the KJV. What you posted from the Berean Study Bible is not KJV.

Sorry bout that,  I thought it was KJV - on purpose I choose KJV each time. 

=================================================

As Jesus Says Instead:  Do not judge by what you can (physically) (read) see and hear,

rather

Do not judge according to appearance, but judge righteous judgment. Jesus is saying we can "judge" only do it correctly, not by what you see or hear but by the Word of truth.  (The Father's Righteous Judgment, lacking in babylon)
 

Isaiah 11:3

King James Version

3 And shall make him of quick understanding in the fear of the Lord: and he shall not judge after the sight of his eyes, neither reprove after the hearing of his ears:

https://biblehub.com/kjv/isaiah/11-4.htm

 

Verse  (Click for Chapter)

King James Bible
But with righteousness shall he judge the poor, and reprove with equity for the meek of the earth: and he shall smite the earth with the rod of his mouth, and with the breath of his lips shall he slay the wicked.

As Jesus Says Instead:  Do not judge by what you can (physically) (read) see and hear,

rather

Do not judge according to appearance, but judge righteous judgment. Jesus is saying we can "judge" only do it correctly, not by what you see or hear but by the Word of truth.  (The Father's Righteous Judgment, lacking in babylon)
 

Isaiah 11:3

King James Version

3 And shall make him of quick understanding in the fear of the Lord: and he shall not judge after the sight of his eyes, neither reprove after the hearing of his ears:

 

As Jesus Says Instead:  Do not judge by what you can (physically) (read) see and hear,

rather

Do not judge according to appearance, but judge righteous judgment. Jesus is saying we can "judge" only do it correctly, not by what you see or hear but by the Word of truth.  (The Father's Righteous Judgment, lacking in babylon)

 

Isaiah 11:3

King James Version

3 And shall make him of quick understanding in the fear of the Lord: and he shall not judge after the sight of his eyes, neither reprove after the hearing of his ears:

https://biblehub.com/kjv/isaiah/11-4.htm

 

Verse  (Click for Chapter)

King James Bible
But with righteousness shall he judge the poor, and reprove with equity for the meek of the earth: and he shall smite the earth with the rod of his mouth, and with the breath of his lips shall he slay the wicked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

What Trump Got Right:

He flushed out all the Democrats for what they are:

Socialists, Communists, corporate shills. (Yes, you can be both)

He flushed out what Republicans are:

RINOS, spineless wimps, Dem lapdogs and corporate stooges.

He flushed out what the CIA, FBI, NSA, DEA, ATF and DHS are:

The Deep State, enemies of the Constitution.

He flushed out the MSM and Silicone Valley for what they are:

PRAVDA; the Fifth Column.

Trump failed on a lot of his promises but he got those things right.

There's no more deceiving the People.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
On 8/1/2021 at 7:49 AM, Bouncing Bill said:

But do you not need to know what was done so you can compare their deeds to the Bible?

Not trying to be disrespectful here, BB, but, to be honest, that doesn't seem to be helping you any. You're supporting a man who has taken money from China in bribes, is covering up for his son, whom he is an accessory in crime with, and for trying to bankrupt our country. Look at his cabinet...gays, transgenders, and Socialists...and you support this administration, or so it seems. It's hard to take you seriously when you speak about the Bible when you support evil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, BrotherTony said:

Not trying to be disrespectful here, BB, but, to be honest, that doesn't seem to be helping you any. You're supporting a man who has taken money from China in bribes, is covering up for his son, whom he is an accessory in crime with, and for trying to bankrupt our country. Look at his cabinet...gays, transgenders, and Socialists...and you support this administration, or so it seems. It's hard to take you seriously when you speak about the Bible when you support evil

Oh, I don't support Trump. But even he did something right. To me he will go down as the poorest president in our history. I posted a link to the article to show I can given credit where it is due. Tump is a man to be pitied. In time I expect he will go to jail. You see BT, I am not a blind, one issue person.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
15 minutes ago, Bouncing Bill said:

Oh, I don't support Trump. But even he did something right. To me he will go down as the poorest president in our history. I posted a link to the article to show I can given credit where it is due. Tump is a man to be pitied. In time I expect he will go to jail. You see BT, I am not a blind, one issue person.

Where did I imply you supported Trump? Please, pray tell, show me. I doubt he'll go to jail. No American President or former POTUS has and I doubt that one will in our lifetime. Trump did many things right...he brought employment up to healthy levels, which Biden has destroyed in less than six months. He started a wall that helped many of the ranchers/farmers keep most illegals out of their properties and safe from vandalism, murder and drugs. He exposed the Socialist Democrats for what they truly are and suffered for it! He worked for free while Biden has taken bribes from China, as has his son, for whom he's covering up. He helped expose Pelosi for what she is, and Mitch McConnell for what he is...A rhino! Though Trump wasn't my first choice for POTUS, I supported him because I'd seen how Joe Biden lied, cheated and stole his way to the top ranks of the Senate, and how he was nothing more than a potential threat to children, women and others around him. You may have given Trump a thimble of credit, but nowhere near enough. If he were to run again, I wouldn't vote for him. If he does run, I'm hoping he doesn't become the nominee...because then I would have to vote Libertarian. I won't vote for  a Socialist Democrat! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, BrotherTony said:

Where did I imply you supported Trump? Please, pray tell, show me. I doubt he'll go to jail. No American President or former POTUS has and I doubt that one will in our lifetime. Trump did many things right...he brought employment up to healthy levels, which Biden has destroyed in less than six months. He started a wall that helped many of the ranchers/farmers keep most illegals out of their properties and safe from vandalism, murder and drugs. He exposed the Socialist Democrats for what they truly are and suffered for it! He worked for free while Biden has taken bribes from China, as has his son, for whom he's covering up. He helped expose Pelosi for what she is, and Mitch McConnell for what he is...A rhino! Though Trump wasn't my first choice for POTUS, I supported him because I'd seen how Joe Biden lied, cheated and stole his way to the top ranks of the Senate, and how he was nothing more than a potential threat to children, women and others around him. You may have given Trump a thimble of credit, but nowhere near enough. If he were to run again, I wouldn't vote for him. If he does run, I'm hoping he doesn't become the nominee...because then I would have to vote Libertarian. I won't vote for  a Socialist Democrat! 

In your sentence that began, "You're supporting a man who has taken money from..."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
1 minute ago, Bouncing Bill said:

In your sentence that began, "You're supporting a man who has taken money from..."

 

Unt uh! You know good and well I was referring to Biden. NOWHERE was Trump implied. You're a piece of work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, BrotherTony said:

Unt uh! You know good and well I was referring to Biden. NOWHERE was Trump implied. You're a piece of work.

The thread is about Trump, so you are guilty. Stay on the subject and you will look better. I expect you voted for Trump, the most immoral person to ever run for or be president. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
30 minutes ago, Bouncing Bill said:

The thread is about Trump, so you are guilty. Stay on the subject and you will look better. I expect you voted for Trump, the most immoral person to ever run for or be president. 

Huh! That's rich coming from one of the biggest thread derailers in these forums. Now...back to Trump. If you're against him, he had to have done SOMETHING right! 😉 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
19 hours ago, Bouncing Bill said:

The thread is about Trump, so you are guilty. Stay on the subject and you will look better. I expect you voted for Trump, the most immoral person to ever run for or be president. 

"The most immoral person to EVER run for or be president." REALLY?!?!? There is no doubt that Trump is an immoral person (as most all lost people are), but to say that he is the most immoral is, at best, a guess based off of bias opinion. There have been numerous immoral presidents in the White House. Perhaps the two most notable were JFK and Clinton. I don't generally step into political discussions because for the most part they are a complete waste of time that borders on idolatry for many Christians, but this sets me off. Just because you think something is so, doesn't make it fact. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Musician4God1611 said:

"The most immoral person to EVER run for or be president." REALLY?!?!? There is no doubt that Trump is an immoral person (as most all lost people are), but to say that he is the most immoral is, at best, a guess based off of bias opinion. There have been numerous immoral presidents in the White House. Perhaps the two most notable were JFK and Clinton. I don't generally step into political discussions because for the most part they are a complete waste of time that borders on idolatry for many Christians, but this sets me off. Just because you think something is so, doesn't make it fact. 

I agree with you that Clinton and JFK were immoral, but they was small time folk compared to Trump.

Trump has been married 3 times.

There are a number of known adulterous affairs. No one know how many others there are.

Nineteen women have accused Trump of sexual harrassment.

It is well known that Trump had a close association with "Fat Tony" Salerno, the mobster who controlled the concrete industry in New York City. If Trump had not been compromised and cooperated with "Fat Tony" his NYC buildings were never have been built. No concrete, no building. Trump had a close association with the Philadelphia gangster, Philip Testa. Trump Plaza was specifically mentioned when Salerno was charged with rigging construction bids. Salerno had arranged things with Trump concerning concrete needed for the project.

Over 10,000 lies were documented that he told while president.

It is well know that Trump uses undocumented, illegal Polish workers in Florida. 

The list of his immorality and criminal activity goes on and on. He should be named "Teflon" Don. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
18 minutes ago, Bouncing Bill said:

I agree with you that Clinton and JFK were immoral, but they was small time folk compared to Trump.

Trump has been married 3 times.

There are a number of known adulterous affairs. No one know how many others there are.

Nineteen women have accused Trump of sexual harrassment.

It is well known that Trump had a close association with "Fat Tony" Salerno, the mobster who controlled the concrete industry in New York City. If Trump had not been compromised and cooperated with "Fat Tony" his NYC buildings were never have been built. No concrete, no building. Trump had a close association with the Philadelphia gangster, Philip Testa. Trump Plaza was specifically mentioned when Salerno was charged with rigging construction bids. Salerno had arranged things with Trump concerning concrete needed for the project.

Over 10,000 lies were documented that he told while president.

It is well know that Trump uses undocumented, illegal Polish workers in Florida. 

The list of his immorality and criminal activity goes on and on. He should be named "Teflon" Don. 

Immoral and unethical/criminal are not the same thing. With that in mind, the only thing that you have said about Trump that doesn't apply to the others is that he has had multiple marriages. JFK and Clinton both had known adulterous affairs, and no one knows how many others there are. You don't use your position as a means to gain sexual favors without being guilty of sexual harassment, ergo both JFK and Clinton are undoubtedly guilty of sexual harassment. It could be argued, however that whereas Trump is guilty of much immorality, JFK and Clinton both were guilty of it while in the White House. Look, I have no qualms with someone saying that Trump is a bad person, he is, just don't go and say he was "the MOST immoral person EVER" to be president.

 

On a side note, it is a well known fact that every president for the past 50+ years have been a liar, and 10,000 lies in four years only comes out to about 7 lies a day. I know "Pastors" who lie more than that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Exposing, or trying to expose the sins of others, or pointing your finger at them as if that excuses the sins of more massive deceptions , 

or to deflect from the more massive sins of world wide elite 

might be a good idea.

Might not be too.

The whole world fiddles,  shops,  marries and gives in marriage, as it comes to a fiery end.

1 minute ago, Musician4God1611 said:

Immoral and unethical/criminal are not the same thing. With that in mind, the only thing that you have said about Trump that doesn't apply to the others is that he has had multiple marriages. JFK and Clinton both had known adulterous affairs, and no one knows how many others there are. You don't use your position as a means to gain sexual favors without being guilty of sexual harassment, ergo both JFK and Clinton are undoubtedly guilty of sexual harassment. It could be argued, however that whereas Trump is guilty of much immorality, JFK and Clinton both were guilty of it while in the White House. Look, I have no qualms with someone saying that Trump is a bad person, he is, just don't go and say he was "the MOST immoral person EVER" to be president.

 

On a side note, it is a well known fact that every president for the past 50+ years have been a liar, and 10,000 lies in four years only comes out to about 7 lies a day. I know "Pastors" who lie more than that.

The old, infirm,  corrupt,  controlled ,  are all part and parcel of the world reset plan and scheme to get everyone injected with fluourescent toxins that can be measured with devices b.gats and governments and drug masters have had for years.

It seems apparent that ALL of the hype about Trump or any president the last month has all been to sway people into going along with the world wide chaos/ deception  and control that was planned long ago.   Individuals you see saying nonsensical things with no basis or purpose are part of this too,  probably.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
On 8/3/2021 at 12:59 PM, Bouncing Bill said:

I agree with you that Clinton and JFK were immoral, but they was small time folk compared to Trump.

Trump has been married 3 times.

There are a number of known adulterous affairs. No one know how many others there are.

Nineteen women have accused Trump of sexual harrassment.

It is well known that Trump had a close association with "Fat Tony" Salerno, the mobster who controlled the concrete industry in New York City. If Trump had not been compromised and cooperated with "Fat Tony" his NYC buildings were never have been built. No concrete, no building. Trump had a close association with the Philadelphia gangster, Philip Testa. Trump Plaza was specifically mentioned when Salerno was charged with rigging construction bids. Salerno had arranged things with Trump concerning concrete needed for the project.

Over 10,000 lies were documented that he told while president.

It is well know that Trump uses undocumented, illegal Polish workers in Florida. 

The list of his immorality and criminal activity goes on and on. He should be named "Teflon" Don. 

How about being honest and documenting the one you worship..Mr. Biden! I don't believe many of the things you say about Trump...basically because of your PROVEN bias against him. You can't be objective, and you seem more like a troll than a serious poster. Why would ANYONE take you seriously? Trump got many things right! You, however, have gotten many things wrong! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 10 Guests (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...