Jump to content
Online Baptist Community
  • Newest Sermon Entry

    • By Jim_Alaska in Jim_Alaska's Sermons & Devotionals
         14
      Closed Communion
      James Foley
       
      I Corinthians 11:17-34: "Now in this that I declare unto you I praise you not, that ye come together not for the better, but for the worse. For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly believe it. For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you. When ye come together therefore into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's Supper. For in eating every one taketh before other his own supper: and one is hungry, and another is drunken. What? have ye not houses to eat and to drink in? or despise ye the church of God, and shame them that have not? What shall I say to you? shall I praise you in this? I praise you not. For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do show the Lord's death till he come. Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup. For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body. For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world. Wherefore, my brethren, when ye come together to eat, tarry one for another. And if any man hunger, let him eat at home; that ye come not together unto condemnation. And the rest will I set in order when I come."

      INTRODUCTION

      Historic Baptists, true Baptists, have believed in and still believe in closed communion. Baptists impose upon themselves the same restrictions that they impose on others concerning the Lord’s Supper. Baptists have always insisted that it is the Lord’s Table, not theirs; and He alone has the right to say who shall sit at His table. No amount of so called brotherly love, or ecumenical spirit, should cause us to invite to His table those who have not complied with the requirements laid down plainly in His inspired Word. With respect to Bible doctrines we must always use the scripture as our guide and practice. For Baptists, two of the most important doctrines are Baptism and The Lord’s Supper. These are the only two doctrines we recognize as Church Ordinances. The Bible is very clear in teaching how these doctrines are to be practiced and by whom.

      We only have two ordinances that we must never compromise or we risk our very existence, they are Baptism and The Lord’s Supper.

      The moment we deviate from the precise method God has prescribed we have started down the slippery slope of error. True Baptists have held fast to the original doctrine of The Lord’s Supper from the time of Christ and the Apostles.

      Unfortunately, in this day of what the Bible describes as the age of luke warmness, Baptists are becoming careless in regard to strictly following the pattern laid out for us in Scripture. Many of our Bible colleges are graduating otherwise sincere, Godly and dedicated pastors and teachers who have not been taught the very strict, biblical requirements that surround the Lord’s Supper. Any Bible college that neglects to teach its students the differences surrounding Closed Communion, Close Communion and Open Communion is not simply short changing its students; it is also not equipping their students to carry on sound Bible traditions. The result is men of God and churches that fall into error. And as we will see, this is serious error.

      Should we as Baptists ignore the restrictions made by our Lord and Master? NO! When we hold to the restrictions placed upon the Lord’s Supper by our Master, we are defending the "faith which was once delivered to the saints" Jude 3.

      The Lord’s Supper is rigidly restricted and I will show this in the following facts:

      IT IS RESTRICTED AS TO PLACE

      A. I Corinthians 11:18 says, "When ye come together in the church." This does not mean the church building; they had none. In other words, when the church assembles. The supper is to be observed by the church, in church capacity. Again this does not mean the church house. Ekklesia, the Greek word for church, means assembly. "When ye come together in the church," is when the church assembles.

      B. When we say church we mean an assembly of properly baptized believers. Acts 2:41-42: "Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls. And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers."

      The church is made up of saved people who are baptized by immersion. In the Bible, belief precedes baptism. That’s the Bible way.

      Acts 8:12-13, "But when they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women. Then Simon himself believed also: and when he was baptized, he continued with Philip, and wondered, beholding the miracles and signs which were done."

      When we say properly baptized, we mean immersed. No unbeliever should take the Lord’s supper, and no non-immersed believer should take the supper. Those who are sprinkled are not baptized and cannot receive the supper. The Greek word for baptize is baptizo, and it always means to immerse.

      "In every case where communion is referred to, or where it may possibly have been administered, the believers had been baptized Acts 2:42; 8:12; 8:38; 10:47; 6:14-15; 18:8; 20:7. Baptism comes before communion, just as repentance and faith precede baptism".

      C. The Lord’s Supper is for baptized believers in church capacity: "When ye come together in the church," again not a building, but the assembly of the properly baptized believers.

      D. The fact that the Lord’s Supper is a church ordinance, to be observed in church capacity, is pointed out by the fact that it is for those who have been immersed and added to the fellowship of the church.

      E. The Lord’s Supper is never spoken of in connection with individuals. When it is referred to, it is only referred to in reference to baptized believers in local church capacity I Cor. 11:20-26).

      I want to quote Dr. W.W. Hamilton,

      "The individual administration of the ordinance has no Bible warrant and is a relic of Romanism. The Lord’s Supper is a church ordinance, and anything which goes beyond or comes short of this fails for want of scriptural example or command".

      “The practice of taking a little communion kit to hospitals, nursing homes, etc. is unscriptural and does not follow the scriptural example.”

      IT IS RESTRICTED TO A UNITED CHURCH

      A. The Bible in I Cor. 11:18 is very strong in condemning divisions around the Lord’s table. For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly believe it.
      19 For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you.
      20 When ye come together therefore into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's supper.

      There were no less than four divisions in the Corinthian church.
      I Cor. 1:12: "Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ."

      Because of these divisions, it was impossible for them to scripturally eat the Lord’s Supper. Division in the local church is reason to hold off observing the Lord’s Supper. But there are also other reasons to forego taking the Lord’s Supper. If there is gross sin in the membership we do not take it. Here is scriptural evidence for this: 1Co 5:7 Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our Passover is sacrificed for us:
      8 Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. 9 I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators:
      10 Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world. 11 But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.

      B. At this point, I want to ask these questions: Are there not doctrinal divisions among the many denominations? Is it not our doctrinal differences that cause us to be separate religious bodies?

      IT IS RESTRICTED BY DOCTRINE

      A. Those in the early church at Jerusalem who partook "continued stedfastly in the apostles’ doctrine" Acts 2:42. And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.

      B. Those that do not hold to apostolic truth are not to partake. This means there is to be discipline in the local body. How can you discipline those who do not belong to the local body? You can’t. The clear command of scripture is to withdraw fellowship from those who are not doctrinally sound.

      II Thes 3:6: "Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us."
      Rom. 16:17: "Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them."
      To commune together means to have the same doctrine.
      II Thes. 2:15: "Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle."
      II John 10-11: "If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds."

      C. Some Baptists in our day have watered down this doctrine by practicing what they call “Close Communion.” By this they mean that they believe that members of another Baptist church may take communion with us because they are of the same beliefs. Once again, this is unscriptural.

      The welcome to the Lord's Table should not be extended beyond the discipline of the local church. When we take the Lord’s Supper there is supposed to be no gross sin among us and no divisions among us. We have no idea of the spiritual condition of another church’s members. If there is sin or division in the case of this other church’s members, we have no way of knowing it. We cannot discipline them because they are not members of our church. This is why we practice “Closed” communion, meaning it is restricted solely to our church membership. 
      So then, in closing I would like to reiterate the three different ideas concerning the Lord’s Supper and who is to take it. 
      Closed Communion = Only members of a single local church. 
      Close Communion = Members of like faith and order may partake. 
      Open Communion = If you claim to be a Christian, or simply attending the service, you may partake. 
      It is no small thing to attempt to change that which was implemented by our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. 
      Mt. 28:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen. 
      Many of our Baptist churches have a real need to consider the gravity of the act of observing The Lord’s Supper. It is not a light thing that is to be taken casually or without regard to the spiritual condition of ourselves or our church.
      1Co. 11:27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.

       28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.

       29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.

       30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.

Official Covid Thread (Other Threads Merged in here)


Recommended Posts

  • Members

https://www.salk.edu/news-release/the-novel-coronavirus-spike-protein-plays-additional-key-role-in-illness/

After telling us that the "spike protein" of Covid is harmless now they are saying it is harmful. The vaccine is the code that creates this spike in your body.

I've also read where two top molecular biologists, a Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi, who said the vaccine will require endless boosters or you will get sick and a Dr. Janci Chunn Lindsay who said the vaccine will cause "immune escape" where our immune system will fail to recognize the virus anymore. 

Of course, you will be banned if you mention these possibilities. These two doctors are already being labeled crackpots by those trying impose this vaccine on everyone. $$$

https://rumble.com/vgerov-dr.-sucharit-bhakdi-warns-covid-shots-to-decimate-world-population.html?mref=2oodx&mc=8wf7a

https://www.jennifermargulis.net/halt-covid-vaccine-research-scientist-urges-cdc/

I read also where the most vaccinated nation in the world, Seychelles, who also stopped all tourism, is presently having a huge outbreak.

I am not an anti-vaxxer but I have grave concerns about this vaccine especially because of the psychopaths behind it, i.e. Bill Gates and Dr. Fauci.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
  • Administrators

We decided to have one thread about Covid instead of having countless threads covering the same topic. 

Since this still a hot topic in the world today we don't want not talk about it regardless of beliefs.

Whatever you opinion is on covid, this is where you we'll talk about it.  All new threads will be closed so please post covid-19 related topics in this thread.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

Thanks Bro. Matt.

As part of my security job I deal with a lot of the government covid regulations and securing pharmaceuticals here in MI and the vaccine process. I'm Pro-mRNA Vaccines and social distancing/quarantining but Anti-Lockdown. 

A lot of miss-information is being passed around on both sides who don't understand the science and the mechanics of actually researching, producing, marketing, logistics, and regulations of pharmaceuticals. I deal with the business end of this stuff everyday so if anyone has technical questions I can probably answer a lot of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Everything I quote came from 

1 hour ago, John Young said:

Thanks Bro. Matt.

As part of my security job I deal with a lot of the government covid regulations and securing pharmaceuticals here in MI and the vaccine process. I'm Pro-mRNA Vaccines and social distancing/quarantining but Anti-Lockdown. 

A lot of miss-information is being passed around on both sides who don't understand the science and the mechanics of actually researching, producing, marketing, logistics, and regulations of pharmaceuticals. I deal with the business end of this stuff everyday so if anyone has technical questions I can probably answer a lot of them.

Everything I've posted came from scientific/medical community. 

Maybe you are wrong, brother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
4 minutes ago, SureWord said:

Everything I've posted came from scientific/medical community. 

Not looking to fight or argue with you. I'm just looking to help those who want practical information on the subject rather than speculation on "what could be possible".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
4 minutes ago, SureWord said:

Everything I quote came from 

Everything I've posted came from scientific/medical community. 

Maybe you are wrong, brother.

Within the pharmakeia system he may be proven right.  (but in God's Kingdom, that is all wrong)

Problem is,  pharmakeia is always deceiving - it is the deceiving power noted by the Creator in Revelation Chapter 18.

Thus,  with all the world's credentials, with all the world thinks is good (God calls an abomination),

whenever anyone puts their trust in science in the world,  they already failed.  They cannot be helped nor corrected until they repent .  (turn to the Creator as Jesus Says,  ONLY the Creator,  away from the deception of the world science and technology and knowledge that is falsely called knowledge.

The Wisdom that is from above always rejects the worldly wisdom and the worldly knowledge,

but who knows this ?   Who accepts God's Word ?  Who will receive our report (from above) ? 

Or in the vernacular to them "you're not ready for truth!"   They cannot believe they have been duped completely and utterly by the system they put their trust in .

1 hour ago, PastorMatt said:

We decided to have one thread about Covid instead of having countless threads covering the same topic. 

Since this still a hot topic in the world today we don't want not talk about it regardless of beliefs.

Whatever you opinion is on covid, this is where you we'll talk about it.  All new threads will be closed so please post covid-19 related topics in this thread.. 

No one's opinion will change the Truth, btw.   What the Creator Declares and what He Reveals is truth.  No worldly opinions nor science nor such should even be considered - He says that is wrong.

1 hour ago, John Young said:

Thanks Bro. Matt.

As part of my security job I deal with a lot of the government covid regulations and securing pharmaceuticals here in MI and the vaccine process. I'm Pro-mRNA Vaccines and social distancing/quarantining but Anti-Lockdown. 

A lot of miss-information is being passed around on both sides who don't understand the science and the mechanics of actually researching, producing, marketing, logistics, and regulations of pharmaceuticals. I deal with the business end of this stuff everyday so if anyone has technical questions I can probably answer a lot of them.

"a lot of miss-information" is putting it lightly.

THe information from pharmakeia is pernicious on purpose - death dealing and they are trying to bring everyone in the world to destruction, period.   (Galatians Clearly Shows this ,  help understanding via Wuest's Pdf Study from the Greek in Galatians specially: society is pernicious).

i.e. society is not good.  Society is not helpful.  Society is not life-giving.  Society is not right.  Society including science and medicine and politics is pernicious.

2 minutes ago, John Young said:

Not looking to fight or argue with you. I'm just looking to help those who want practical information on the subject rather than speculation on "what could be possible".

Yet God's Word does not say to speculate sinfully on "what could be possible",

rather seek from Him the Truth and acknowledge it, tell it from the roof tops,  testify of God's Truthfulness and man's wickedness and sin.

All the information that is from society, from and of the world,  practical or not,  is pernicious according to God's Own Word.    The source being evil,  it spreads evil,  from the father of lies, the prince of the power of the air, satan. 

Only the Redeemed in Jesus,  cleansed by His Blood, Reborn by the Will of the Father in heaven ,

are set free from the world power/ deception and control.    Those still remaining in the world's power,

are still remaining in the world's deception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

@jeff_student_of_Jesus.....Strange, I recall a Bible verse that says that only the sick need a physician...SCIENCE! Luke was a physician....SCIENCE! Science is not necessarily bad in and of itself. Medicine (pharmaceuticals) are not necessarily a bad thing. I'm diabetic and have to use insulin. I wouldn't die if I didn't take it, being type II, but it is necessary to regulate m my blood sugar, as are the other two medications for the diabetes. I use an inhaler for my asthma and COPD. Again...medication that is necesary for me to breathe. I believe you're incorrect in your assumptions that people who put their trust in science are wrong. There are some scientific breakthroughs that have been very beneficial to mankind. Maybe you need to be rethinking your premise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Many of the unvaccinated are stating that they believe the C-19 virus is less of a danger than the vaccination! Of course, the government line is that this is "hooey," but we all know that our government isn't honest. Below is the article for anyone who wishes to read it.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/unvaccinated-americans-say-vaccines-are-riskier-than-covid-19-poll-finds/ar-AAMmYGr?ocid=chromentpnews

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, BrotherTony said:

Many of the unvaccinated are stating that they believe the C-19 virus is less of a danger than the vaccination! Of course, the government line is that this is "hooey," but we all know that our government isn't honest. Below is the article for anyone who wishes to read it.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/unvaccinated-americans-say-vaccines-are-riskier-than-covid-19-poll-finds/ar-AAMmYGr?ocid=chromentpnews

How many people have died from COVID?

How many people have died from the vaccination?

How many people have died from COVID after being vaccinated?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators
17 minutes ago, Bouncing Bill said:

How many people have died from COVID?

How many people have died from the vaccination?

How many people have died from COVID after being vaccinated?

This is the question I keep asking and I believe we all want to know the real answers to. In my state they don't tell us how many died because "of" Covid, instead they say how many died "with" Covid. I know people that left the hospital employment because they were pressured into putting down covid as the result of death when it wasn't Covid. I know people that have lawsuits to change the cause of death when they got covid in the hospital and was already in ICU

For the record I believe...Covid is real, Covid has killed people, and vaccines can help. What I question is the real numbers that are put out by the government/hospitals in order for the government to have more control. I also question why I'm being pushed to be vaccinated when I already have had Covid. All I want is cleat cut answers from our government on what is going on. No more misleading information. People can post links all day long, it doesn't change the fact that we DONT know where those numbers are really coming from.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

Since Covid has a 99.8% recovery rate, it is safe to say that almost no one has died from Covid alone. By the way, the 99.8% recovery rate includes those that died from complications brought on by Covid and/or pre-existing conditions.

Most that died died from complications brought on by Covid, would likely have also died from the seasonal Flu; of which, over time, many more have died from than Covid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jim_Alaska said:

Since Covid has a 99.8% recovery rate, it is safe to say that almost no one has died from Covid alone. By the way, the 99.8% recovery rate includes those that died from complications brought on by Covid and/or pre-existing conditions.

Most that died died from complications brought on by Covid, would likely have also died from the seasonal Flu; of which, over time, many more have died from than Covid.

I'm not sure what your point is. Regardless that does not help the 4 million who have died. Also, you do not mention the people who suffer long term effects. That is about 10% of all cases. https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/04/210407174321.htm

If you want to read about the long term effects go to;

https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/coronavirus-long-term-effects/art-20490351

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
3 hours ago, John Young said:

Thanks Bro. Matt.

As part of my security job I deal with a lot of the government covid regulations and securing pharmaceuticals here in MI and the vaccine process. I'm Pro-mRNA Vaccines and social distancing/quarantining but Anti-Lockdown. 

A lot of miss-information is being passed around on both sides who don't understand the science and the mechanics of actually researching, producing, marketing, logistics, and regulations of pharmaceuticals. I deal with the business end of this stuff everyday so if anyone has technical questions I can probably answer a lot of them.

Forgive the skepticism John, but please explain how a security employee of the MI state government or big pharma or both would have any real idea of what is going on? Unless you are at their highest echelons which somehow I doubt unless you want to correct that and tell me you are a chief virologist whom developed these shots? 

By your own admission you are on the back end of this list you provide, somewhere behind researching and producing which is all that matters in these discussions. The rest of the list is simply moving product and regulating profit which would give you no more insight above the public except of course that you hear the repetition of their narratives more often. Please explain how you could possibly answer technical questions while being on the business end? Unless you simply repeat what you are told? That is no expertise at all my friend and it seems disingenuous that you would pretend it is.

Any information you have been given would match the same propaganda big pharma, government and the mass media collaborate on. Please don't present yourself as something you are not in these discussions. Everyone already knows what our reprobate government and media repetitiously pushes.  

The main issue here is suppression of information by the government and big pharma you work for and there is plenty of evidence on that if you know to look to independent news not owned by the same people that own big pharma and our governments. The biggest take away from this is that these same independent news outlets are not driven by the reprobate agendas of our satanic governments and global conglomerates. You won't see, read or hear anything promoting Godless agendas on these sources but rather the denunciation of them. Can you say the same from your place of employment or the Michigan or federal government?

Would you believe any words out of the mouth of a guest preacher in your church whom pushed abortion and the globohomo, population control initiatives?  I hope not.

So then why would you imagine your workplace would provide you the truth?  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
1 hour ago, Bouncing Bill said:

How many people have died from COVID?

How many people have died from the vaccination?

How many people have died from COVID after being vaccinated?

Nobody can give an accurate count because the government has stimied all attempts to gain such information, instead feeding the public a continuing dose of their horse puckey, and also the government Kool-Aide to terrorize people into taking the vaccine. The recovery rate is far too high for this to be classified as a true "pandemic." I'm not saying that the Wuhan Flu isn't real, because it is. I have had many in my family who have had it. But, with the exception of my wife's uncle, not one of them has died with it. He didn't die BECAUSE of it. And, he HAD BEEN VACCINATED!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
Posted (edited)
44 minutes ago, wretched said:

Forgive the skepticism John

Okay I'll forgive the skepticism. I didn't make my offer to help based on trying to promote the main line view but to help with basic fundamental facts as people consider the issues. I have no interest in parroting stuff or giving details about the people and places I work with to justify my statement because this is an online public form.

If you are not interested in the practical science and logistics and preferer the sensationalism of speculative conspiracy then that's up to you. I have no interest in it and won't spend the time to justify my offer of practical conversation on the subject based on my real experience and recourses. Believe what and who you want. It won't effect me one way or another.

I'm willing to discus the practical if anyone has questions on that side of things.

Edited by John Young
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
2 minutes ago, John Young said:

Okay I'll forgive the skepticism. I didn't make my offer to help based on trying to promote the main line view but to help with basic fundamental facts as people consider the issues. I have no interest in parroting stuff or going into detail about the people and places I work with to justify my statement because this is a public form and the information is freely available and I've gone as far as I like without further personally identifying online.

If you are not interested in the practical science and logistics and preferer the sensationalism of speculative conspiracy then that's up to you. I have no interest in it and won't spend the time to justify my offer of practical conversation on the subject on the basis of my experience and recourses. Believe what and who you want. It won't effect me one way or another.

I'm willing to discus the practical if anyone has questions on that side of things.

Well my friend, you miss the point which is that you don't know the science. If you did, you wouldn't be on the business end.  Thanks but I prefer unadulterated facts that aren't provided by government or big pharma whom profit in human misery.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

Today in congress Rand Paul challenged Fauci on the "natural virus" claim and is narrowing in on the claim that it may not be natural as evidence is starting to reveal. 

WHO, CDC, Fauci and the communist government claim it was from nature but more and more evidence is coming out to support the US intelligence and chinese defectors and wisleblower claims that it is not natural and came from the lab.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 9 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...