Jump to content
Online Baptist

Separation over doctrine.


Recommended Posts

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
3 hours ago, Pastor Scott Markle said:

Ahhh, but here is my problem with your above statement. You continue to use the two phrases, "Fundamentals of the Faith" and "secondary issues."  However, these phrases are NOT found in God's Word; therefore, we cannot acquire a direct Biblical definition for these phrases.  As such, these phrases are able to be defined according to our own preferences/agendas.  How then do we define the "line of separation" according to a BIBLICAL definition thereof?  How do we define "Fundamentals of the Faith" from GOD'S OWN WORD?  How do we define "secondary issues" from GOD'S OWN WORD?  

Now, I myself have presented an actual teaching on separation from GOD'S OWN WORD, as per 1 Timothy 6:3-5.  According to that teaching of GOD'S OWN WORD the matter for separation is NOT the "Fundamentals of the Faith" versus "secondary issues."  Rather, according to the teaching of GOD'S OWN WORD in that passage, the matter for separation is "if ANY man" (believer or unbeliever) teaches contrary "to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness."  This is how GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT HIMSELF defines the matter of doctrinal separation.  As for me, I prefer to follow God the Holy Spirit on the matter of separation rather than man-made definitions and paradigms on the matter.

By the way, the phrase, "come out from among them, and be ye separate" is found in 2 Corinthians 6:16.  The context for this verse encompasses 2 Corinthians 6:14-182 Corinthians 6:14 begins, "Be ye not unequally yoked together with UNBELIEVERS . . . ."  Even so, this passage is NOT about separation from those who teach and/or hold to false doctrine.  Rather, this passage is about separation from UNBELIEVERS simply because they are unbelievers.  The "them" of 2 Corinthians 6:16 from whom we are to "come out" and be "separate" are the UNBELIEVERS of 2 Corinthians 6:14.  Now, 2 Corinthians 6:14-18 DOES indeed apply to the Biblical doctrine of separation, but NOT concerning separation over false teaching and from false teachers (which is taught in passages such as 1 Timothy 6:3-5).

Brother DaChaser, my counsel (for what it may be worth to you) is that - if you really want to stand for Biblical truth, then you should bring forward a whole lot more actual Scripture into your communications and discussions, and that you should spend much more time actually exegeting those Scriptural passages according to their grammar and context.

Spot on. I am so glad for you pointing this out. I am still yet to see any Neo-Evangelical explain scripturally what is a fundamental and what is secondary. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

And that changes nothing at all of what I said. Christ has done His part: Died to pay for the sin of the world; Lightens every man that comes into the world; draws all men to Him from the cross. What

Was just thinking that maybe I should give some examples of doctrines that I view as "fundamental," more than the commonly listed five: 1.  The Second Coming of our Lord Jesus Christ (and the 1,0

Ahhh, but here is my problem with your above statement. You continue to use the two phrases, "Fundamentals of the Faith" and "secondary issues."  However, these phrases are NOT found in God's Word; th

  • Members
21 hours ago, gracelife said:

Calvinism is a man made paradigm that holds to doctrine that is contrary to Scripture! They eisegete Scripture by imposing their heretical doctrine into the text instead of exegeting Scripture! Calvinism is absolute heresy that is leading many many people to hell!!! The god of Calvinism is EVIL!!!

You misunderstand both Calvinism and proper Sotierology of the scriptures!

16 hours ago, Jordan Kurecki said:

Spot on. I am so glad for you pointing this out. I am still yet to see any Neo-Evangelical explain scripturally what is a fundamental and what is secondary. 

I am not neo eveangelical, as am a reformed baptist, who would see that under the Grace of our Lord jesus is that one can have differing viewpoints, can be pre/post A mil for example!

20 hours ago, Pastor Scott Markle said:

Ahhh, but here is my problem with your above statement. You continue to use the two phrases, "Fundamentals of the Faith" and "secondary issues."  However, these phrases are NOT found in God's Word; therefore, we cannot acquire a direct Biblical definition for these phrases.  As such, these phrases are able to be defined according to our own preferences/agendas.  How then do we define the "line of separation" according to a BIBLICAL definition thereof?  How do we define "Fundamentals of the Faith" from GOD'S OWN WORD?  How do we define "secondary issues" from GOD'S OWN WORD?  

Now, I myself have presented an actual teaching on separation from GOD'S OWN WORD, as per 1 Timothy 6:3-5.  According to that teaching of GOD'S OWN WORD the matter for separation is NOT the "Fundamentals of the Faith" versus "secondary issues."  Rather, according to the teaching of GOD'S OWN WORD in that passage, the matter for separation is "if ANY man" (believer or unbeliever) teaches contrary "to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness."  This is how GOD THE HOLY SPIRIT HIMSELF defines the matter of doctrinal separation.  As for me, I prefer to follow God the Holy Spirit on the matter of separation rather than man-made definitions and paradigms on the matter.

By the way, the phrase, "come out from among them, and be ye separate" is found in 2 Corinthians 6:16.  The context for this verse encompasses 2 Corinthians 6:14-182 Corinthians 6:14 begins, "Be ye not unequally yoked together with UNBELIEVERS . . . ."  Even so, this passage is NOT about separation from those who teach and/or hold to false doctrine.  Rather, this passage is about separation from UNBELIEVERS simply because they are unbelievers.  The "them" of 2 Corinthians 6:16 from whom we are to "come out" and be "separate" are the UNBELIEVERS of 2 Corinthians 6:14.  Now, 2 Corinthians 6:14-18 DOES indeed apply to the Biblical doctrine of separation, but NOT concerning separation over false teaching and from false teachers (which is taught in passages such as 1 Timothy 6:3-5).

Brother DaChaser, my counsel (for what it may be worth to you) is that - if you really want to stand for Biblical truth, then you should bring forward a whole lot more actual Scripture into your communications and discussions, and that you should spend much more time actually exegeting those Scriptural passages according to their grammar and context.

Do you accept that one can be a fellow believer and disagree on timing of Second Coming, and Baptist modes for examples?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
1 hour ago, DaChaser said:

Do you accept that one can be a fellow believer and disagree on timing of Second Coming, and Baptist modes for examples?

Brother DaChaser,

I do indeed believe that an individual can be a fellow believer through faith in Christ and yet disagree concerning the doctrine of the Second Coming, the doctrine of baptism, etc.  However, I do NOT believe that the Biblical doctrine of separation limits separation only from unbelievers.  In fact, in accord with 1 Timothy 6:3-5 I believe that the Biblical doctrine of separation requires me to separate from "ANY" individual (believer or unbeliever) who teaches contrary "to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness."  

This thread discussion is not about how we define who is a fellow believer.  Rather, this thread discussion is about those from whom we should and will separate.  Thus far you seem to be limiting the "line of separation" only in relation to unbelievers.  I am contending that GOD'S OWN WORD also instructs us to separate from fellow believers in some cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
25 minutes ago, Pastor Scott Markle said:

Brother DaChaser,

I do indeed believe that an individual can be a fellow believer through faith in Christ and yet disagree concerning the doctrine of the Second Coming, the doctrine of baptism, etc.  However, I do NOT believe that the Biblical doctrine of separation limits separation only from unbelievers.  In fact, in accord with 1 Timothy 6:3-5 I believe that the Biblical doctrine of separation requires me to separate from "ANY" individual (believer or unbeliever) who teaches contrary "to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness."  

This thread discussion is not about how we define who is a fellow believer.  Rather, this thread discussion is about those from whom we should and will separate.  Thus far you seem to be limiting the "line of separation" only in relation to unbelievers.  I am contending that GOD'S OWN WORD also instructs us to separate from fellow believers in some cases.

I only see separation in the scriptures between believers allowed by God if on e of the parties is into known sinning, and when confronted refuses to repent and is condoning that sin, or if they have gone off into heresy in their doctrines!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
2 hours ago, DaChaser said:

You misunderstand both Calvinism and proper Sotierology of the scriptures!

I am not neo eveangelical, as am a reformed baptist, who would see that under the Grace of our Lord jesus is that one can have differing viewpoints, can be pre/post A mil for example!

Do you accept that one can be a fellow believer and disagree on timing of Second Coming, and Baptist modes for examples?

I used to be a Calvinist and completely understand it! It is a man made philosophy, a paradigm that totally goes against Scripture! It is not biblical at all.

1 hour ago, Pastor Scott Markle said:

Brother DaChaser,

I do indeed believe that an individual can be a fellow believer through faith in Christ and yet disagree concerning the doctrine of the Second Coming, the doctrine of baptism, etc.  However, I do NOT believe that the Biblical doctrine of separation limits separation only from unbelievers.  In fact, in accord with 1 Timothy 6:3-5 I believe that the Biblical doctrine of separation requires me to separate from "ANY" individual (believer or unbeliever) who teaches contrary "to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness."  

This thread discussion is not about how we define who is a fellow believer.  Rather, this thread discussion is about those from whom we should and will separate.  Thus far you seem to be limiting the "line of separation" only in relation to unbelievers.  I am contending that GOD'S OWN WORD also instructs us to separate from fellow believers in some cases.

Yes we are to separate from Calvinists, Arminians, and Lordship Salvationists! Any doctrine that teaches a works based salvation by either front loading the gospel, or back loading the gospel must be avoided and we must separate from them!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Pastor Scott Markle said:

Brother DaChaser,

I do indeed believe that an individual can be a fellow believer through faith in Christ and yet disagree concerning the doctrine of the Second Coming, the doctrine of baptism, etc.  However, I do NOT believe that the Biblical doctrine of separation limits separation only from unbelievers.  In fact, in accord with 1 Timothy 6:3-5 I believe that the Biblical doctrine of separation requires me to separate from "ANY" individual (believer or unbeliever) who teaches contrary "to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness."  

This thread discussion is not about how we define who is a fellow believer.  Rather, this thread discussion is about those from whom we should and will separate.  Thus far you seem to be limiting the "line of separation" only in relation to unbelievers.  I am contending that GOD'S OWN WORD also instructs us to separate from fellow believers in some cases.

1 hour ago, DaChaser said:

I only see separation in the scriptures between believers allowed by God if on e of the parties is into known sinning, and when confronted refuses to repent and is condoning that sin, or if they have gone off into heresy in their doctrines!

So then, what do you do with the "any man" phrase of 1 Timothy 6:3-5 (which IS in the Scriptures)?

By the way, could you please provide a Biblical definition for the word "heresy"?

Edited by Pastor Scott Markle
The added "by the way" request.
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
3 hours ago, gracelife said:

I used to be a Calvinist and completely understand it! It is a man made philosophy, a paradigm that totally goes against Scripture! It is not biblical at all.

Yes we are to separate from Calvinists, Arminians, and Lordship Salvationists! Any doctrine that teaches a works based salvation by either front loading the gospel, or back loading the gospel must be avoided and we must separate from them!

Should we not desire to have jesus has the Lord over all aspects of our lives though?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
2 hours ago, Pastor Scott Markle said:

So then, what do you do with the "any man" phrase of 1 Timothy 6:3-5 (which IS in the Scriptures)?

By the way, could you please provide a Biblical definition for the word "heresy"?

Heresy to my understanding would be anything doctrine that would be against what has been historically held as being orthodox for the Christian community.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
41 minutes ago, DaChaser said:

Heresy to my understanding would be anything doctrine that would be against what has been historically held as being orthodox for the Christian community.

Heresy is any doctrine that does not align with Scripture. Calvinism is a man made philosophy, a paradigm that does not align at all with Scripture. It is a damnable heresy! The god of Calvinism is sadistic!

2 Peter 2:1 - But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, DaChaser said:

Heresy to my understanding would be anything doctrine that would be against what has been historically held as being orthodox for the Christian community.  (emphasis added by Pastor Scott Markle)

And that reveals one of the differences between us - I do NOT hold to "historical orthodoxy" as my authority for doctrine and behavior.  Rather, I hold to GOD'S OWN WORD as my authority for doctrine and behavior.  (Which is probably one of the reasons that my posts in this thread discussion have included actual Scriptural quotations and explanations for support, while yours have lacked actual Scriptural quotations.)

Edited by Pastor Scott Markle
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
Posted (edited)
19 hours ago, gracelife said:

Heresy is any doctrine that does not align with Scripture. Calvinism is a man made philosophy, a paradigm that does not align at all with Scripture. It is a damnable heresy! The god of Calvinism is sadistic!

2 Peter 2:1 - But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction.

Calvinism gives the full glory to God for the plan and outworking of salvation, how is that heresy?

15 hours ago, Pastor Scott Markle said:

And that reveals one of the differences between us - I do NOT hold to "historical orthodoxy" as my authority for doctrine and behavior.  Rather, I hold to GOD'S OWN WORD as my authority for doctrine and behavior.  (Which is probably one of the reasons that my posts in this thread discussion have included actual Scriptural quotations and explanations for support, while yours have lacked actual Scriptural quotations.)

Sound Christian doctrines, as expressed in the Bible and in the historical confessions and creeds of the Faith!

Edited by DaChaser
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
15 minutes ago, DaChaser said:

Sound Christian doctrines, as expressed in the Bible and in the historical confessions and creeds of the Faith!

I disagree.  I hold - Sound Christian doctrine as expressed in the the Bible, God's Own Word, ALONE!!!  I care not at all concerning "historical confessions and creeds of the faith.  I care not at all concerning the man-made paradigm of so-called "orthodoxy."  God's Own Word is my ONLY and FINAL authority for belief and behavior.!!!  (Indeed, a significant difference between us.)  "All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness." (See 2 Timothy 3:16)  No historical confession or creed of the faith was given by inspiration of God.  Why then would I step down from that which is God-inspired to that which is man-made?  As for me, I will NOT!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Administrators

In a previous post you said; "I am not neo eveangelical, as am a reformed baptist". In this I feel the need to ask; reformed from what? Possibly this?:

Jude 3 (KJV) Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.  1Ti 1:3 As I besought thee to abide still at Ephesus, when I went into Macedonia, that thou mightest charge some that they teach no other doctrine,

The faith once delivered to the saints was pre-Calvin.

 

Calvinism easily falls under Paul's instruction to Timothy here: 1Ti 1:4 Neither give heed to fables and endless genealogies, which minister questions, rather than godly edifying which is in faith: so do.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
3 hours ago, Pastor Scott Markle said:

I disagree.  I hold - Sound Christian doctrine as expressed in the the Bible, God's Own Word, ALONE!!!  I care not at all concerning "historical confessions and creeds of the faith.  I care not at all concerning the man-made paradigm of so-called "orthodoxy."  God's Own Word is my ONLY and FINAL authority for belief and behavior.!!!  (Indeed, a significant difference between us.)  "All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness." (See 2 Timothy 3:16)  No historical confession or creed of the faith was given by inspiration of God.  Why then would I step down from that which is God-inspired to that which is man-made?  As for me, I will NOT!!!

I do not see ANY of the Confessions are inspired, nor as the final authority, as that is still in thje scriptures themselves, but do see the Confessions as useful summaries of what the scriptures themselves teach!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Moderators
On 5/30/2020 at 8:43 AM, DaChaser said:

Calvinism gives the full glory to God for the plan and outworking of salvation, how is that heresy?

 

Calvinism goes well beyond that. Of course God is to be given full glory for the plan and outworking of salvation; the problem is it then delves into philosophy and declares that man can't be saved before he is regenerated, and that man, because he is dead in sin, cannot, therefore, make a choice to follow, yet I disagree with that, and so does scripture. 
 

In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,  Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his glory. " (Eph 1:13, 14)  1: Hear, 2: Trust, 3: believe, 4: Sealed. Regeneration occurs at 3, believe. It cannot begin at 1. Predestination is through foreknowledge, not declaration. Christ did the work, Christ paid the price, Christ enlightens all men, Christ calls all men to Him, but we choose to answer or not.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
On 6/1/2020 at 1:01 PM, gracelife said:

You are deceived @DaChaser!

Scriptures command us to not b reak the unity of the Holy Spirit, for we are all one in Christ Jesus, regardless if labeled Baptist or not, if use Kjv 1611 or not!

1 hour ago, Ukulelemike said:

Calvinism goes well beyond that. Of course God is to be given full glory for the plan and outworking of salvation; the problem is it then delves into philosophy and declares that man can't be saved before he is regenerated, and that man, because he is dead in sin, cannot, therefore, make a choice to follow, yet I disagree with that, and so does scripture. 
 

In whom ye also trusted, after that ye heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation: in whom also after that ye believed, ye were sealed with that holy Spirit of promise,  Which is the earnest of our inheritance until the redemption of the purchased possession, unto the praise of his glory. " (Eph 1:13, 14)  1: Hear, 2: Trust, 3: believe, 4: Sealed. Regeneration occurs at 3, believe. It cannot begin at 1. Predestination is through foreknowledge, not declaration. Christ did the work, Christ paid the price, Christ enlightens all men, Christ calls all men to Him, but we choose to answer or not.

Unless the Holy Spirit enables/quickens lost sinners to place faith in Jesus as Lord, none of us would!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Moderators
2 hours ago, DaChaser said:

Unless the Holy Spirit enables/quickens lost sinners to place faith in Jesus as Lord, none of us would!

Yes. Jesus lightens EVERY man that comes into the world-He gives everyone born the ight to see and receive-at that point, it is up to us to respond.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
24 minutes ago, Ukulelemike said:

Yes. Jesus lightens EVERY man that comes into the world-He gives everyone born the ight to see and receive-at that point, it is up to us to respond.

Not found in the scriptures, as Jesus died for His own elect!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
1 hour ago, DaChaser said:

Not found in the scriptures, as Jesus died for His own elect!

Jesus died for every single person who will ever live! His atonement is UNLIMITED! And no I am not an Arminian! 1 John 2:2 (KJV) reads: "And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world." It is up to unbelievers to respond to the gospel and trust that Christ died for them!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
5 hours ago, Ukulelemike said:

Yes. Jesus lightens EVERY man that comes into the world-He gives everyone born the ight to see and receive-at that point, it is up to us to respond.

5 hours ago, DaChaser said:

Not found in the scriptures, as Jesus died for His own elect!

Really??? Here is a direct quote from God's Own Word, the Holy Scriptures, John 1:9 - "That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world."

(Seems as if your dependence more upon man-made confessions and creeds, than upon God's Own Word, has led you astray.)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Moderators
12 hours ago, Pastor Scott Markle said:

Really??? Here is a direct quote from God's Own Word, the Holy Scriptures, John 1:9 - "That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world."

(Seems as if your dependence more upon man-made confessions and creeds, than upon God's Own Word, has led you astray.)

Thanks for that. I was actually answering that with a lot of scripture, but doing it at work, got distracted and never got it finished. 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Moderators

Query: Does I take away from the sovereignty of God to allow His creation to choose life or death? To choose the eternal life obtained, won and offered by Jesus Christ, or to reject said gift and instead choose ignorance and damnation? Is God LESS sovereign in man following by choice, not by compulsion? I do not believe so. In fact, to declare that God CAN'T do that is to take away from his sovereignty. To declare that SOME have had the ability to follow Christ denied them by God, yet for that same God to demand they follow Him or suffer eternal damnation, KNOWING they cannot, by HIS will, do so, would be a great travesty of justice by Him who is the Only Just One. 

There is a huge difference between demanding someone do something that you know they will not do, and demanding from someone you know they CANNOT do, because you will not allow it.  Jesus bid Peter to walk on the water, knowing that Peter, through Jesus' will, could do so, and so Peter did walk on the water...until Peter's will and fears caused him to begin to sink, his will superseding the will of Christ. So Christ bids all come to Him for eternal life, knowing they all CAN, though knowing most will not. 

20 hours ago, DaChaser said:

Scriptures command us to not break the unity of the Holy Spirit, for we are all one in Christ Jesus, regardless if labeled Baptist or not, if use Kjv 1611 or not!

Scripture please.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
17 hours ago, gracelife said:

Jesus died for every single person who will ever live! His atonement is UNLIMITED! And no I am not an Arminian! 1 John 2:2 (KJV) reads: "And he is the propitiation for our sins: and not for ours only, but also for the sins of the whole world." It is up to unbelievers to respond to the gospel and trust that Christ died for them!

The death of Jesus was sufficient to have save all sinners, as was infinite as he was God, but was intended to save the very elect!

13 hours ago, Pastor Scott Markle said:

Really??? Here is a direct quote from God's Own Word, the Holy Scriptures, John 1:9 - "That was the true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world."

(Seems as if your dependence more upon man-made confessions and creeds, than upon God's Own Word, has led you astray.)

keep reading, as his own received Him, but the rest preferred to stay lost in the dark!

1 hour ago, Ukulelemike said:

Query: Does I take away from the sovereignty of God to allow His creation to choose life or death? To choose the eternal life obtained, won and offered by Jesus Christ, or to reject said gift and instead choose ignorance and damnation? Is God LESS sovereign in man following by choice, not by compulsion? I do not believe so. In fact, to declare that God CAN'T do that is to take away from his sovereignty. To declare that SOME have had the ability to follow Christ denied them by God, yet for that same God to demand they follow Him or suffer eternal damnation, KNOWING they cannot, by HIS will, do so, would be a great travesty of justice by Him who is the Only Just One. 

There is a huge difference between demanding someone do something that you know they will not do, and demanding from someone you know they CANNOT do, because you will not allow it.  Jesus bid Peter to walk on the water, knowing that Peter, through Jesus' will, could do so, and so Peter did walk on the water...until Peter's will and fears caused him to begin to sink, his will superseding the will of Christ. So Christ bids all come to Him for eternal life, knowing they all CAN, though knowing most will not. 

Scripture please.

Ephesians 4:3-6

And as the resylt of the Fall, mankind are sinnners by natures, and cannot by themselves come to Christ, as will prefer to stay in darkness!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
On 5/29/2020 at 11:14 AM, Pastor Scott Markle said:

Brother DaChaser,

I do indeed believe that an individual can be a fellow believer through faith in Christ and yet disagree concerning the doctrine of the Second Coming, the doctrine of baptism, etc.  However, I do NOT believe that the Biblical doctrine of separation limits separation only from unbelievers.  In fact, in accord with 1 Timothy 6:3-5 I believe that the Biblical doctrine of separation requires me to separate from "ANY" individual (believer or unbeliever) who teaches contrary "to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness."  

This thread discussion is not about how we define who is a fellow believer.  Rather, this thread discussion is about those from whom we should and will separate.  Thus far you seem to be limiting the "line of separation" only in relation to unbelievers.  I am contending that GOD'S OWN WORD also instructs us to separate from fellow believers in some cases.

It does, but only when the person is claiming to be saved, and yet refusing to deal with sin issues when confronted, or when they now hold to doctrines contrary to sound doctrines!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 121 Guests (See full list)


  • Tell a friend

    Love Online Baptist? Tell a friend!
  • Members

  • Recent Status Updates

    • Alan

      Happy Birthday John Young! God Bless! 🍰
      · 1 reply
    • KJV ME!

      Now it is time for me to step out of my shell and let go... I AM STRICT KJV!... In scripture God said he would preserve his word... Well did he or didn't he?... If there is every translation under the sun, then he didn't but I KNOW HE DID!... The preserved word of God called the KJV is for the English people has been around for over 400 years and what is interesting to me, is the KJV was translated in 1611 and the Pilgrims landed on Plymouth Rock in 1620... Coincidence?... A new book the preserved KJV word of God for the New World... So take that you KJV naysayers... I have been reading, studying and digging through the KJV for over 50 years... My belief is 100% Christ and scripture says so... Glad to be here and its time to take these shackles off!   
      John 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.
      I am... Brother Ramsey
       
      · 1 reply
    • stan1964stanssb

      Praise God I found such a powerhouse of the outpouring of His Spirit and unapologetic in regards of the defense of the KJV Bible. When I became a Christian back in 1984, I was told to get & read the KJV. It's been my choice all these years.
      · 0 replies
    • 1Timothy115  »  Ukulelemike

      Mike,
      RE: This is why I am here, why are you?
      Also, the land in Egypt wasn't land God gave them it was land Joseph through Pharaoh gave them. God gave them Canaan.
      Dave 
      · 1 reply
    • Alan

      Praise the Lord! Sherry and I, safe, tired, and joyful,  are back in Taiwan.
      · 0 replies
  • Popular Now

  • Forum Statistics

    • Total Topics
      27,464
    • Total Posts
      279,277
  • Topics

  • Recent Status Updates

    • Alan

      Happy Birthday John Young! God Bless! 🍰
      · 1 reply
    • KJV ME!

      Now it is time for me to step out of my shell and let go... I AM STRICT KJV!... In scripture God said he would preserve his word... Well did he or didn't he?... If there is every translation under the sun, then he didn't but I KNOW HE DID!... The preserved word of God called the KJV is for the English people has been around for over 400 years and what is interesting to me, is the KJV was translated in 1611 and the Pilgrims landed on Plymouth Rock in 1620... Coincidence?... A new book the preserved KJV word of God for the New World... So take that you KJV naysayers... I have been reading, studying and digging through the KJV for over 50 years... My belief is 100% Christ and scripture says so... Glad to be here and its time to take these shackles off!   
      John 5:39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me.
      I am... Brother Ramsey
       
      · 1 reply
    • stan1964stanssb

      Praise God I found such a powerhouse of the outpouring of His Spirit and unapologetic in regards of the defense of the KJV Bible. When I became a Christian back in 1984, I was told to get & read the KJV. It's been my choice all these years.
      · 0 replies
    • 1Timothy115  »  Ukulelemike

      Mike,
      RE: This is why I am here, why are you?
      Also, the land in Egypt wasn't land God gave them it was land Joseph through Pharaoh gave them. God gave them Canaan.
      Dave 
      · 1 reply
    • Alan

      Praise the Lord! Sherry and I, safe, tired, and joyful,  are back in Taiwan.
      · 0 replies
×
×
  • Create New...