Jump to content
Online Baptist Community
  • Newest Sermon Entry

    • By Jim_Alaska in Jim_Alaska's Sermons & Devotionals
         14
      Closed Communion
      James Foley
       
      I Corinthians 11:17-34: "Now in this that I declare unto you I praise you not, that ye come together not for the better, but for the worse. For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly believe it. For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you. When ye come together therefore into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's Supper. For in eating every one taketh before other his own supper: and one is hungry, and another is drunken. What? have ye not houses to eat and to drink in? or despise ye the church of God, and shame them that have not? What shall I say to you? shall I praise you in this? I praise you not. For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you, That the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: And when he had given thanks, he brake it, and said, Take, eat: this is my body, which is broken for you: this do in remembrance of me. After the same manner also he took the cup, when he had supped, saying, This cup is the new testament in my blood: this do ye, as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of me. For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink this cup, ye do show the Lord's death till he come. Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup. For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body. For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep. For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged. But when we are judged, we are chastened of the Lord, that we should not be condemned with the world. Wherefore, my brethren, when ye come together to eat, tarry one for another. And if any man hunger, let him eat at home; that ye come not together unto condemnation. And the rest will I set in order when I come."

      INTRODUCTION

      Historic Baptists, true Baptists, have believed in and still believe in closed communion. Baptists impose upon themselves the same restrictions that they impose on others concerning the Lord’s Supper. Baptists have always insisted that it is the Lord’s Table, not theirs; and He alone has the right to say who shall sit at His table. No amount of so called brotherly love, or ecumenical spirit, should cause us to invite to His table those who have not complied with the requirements laid down plainly in His inspired Word. With respect to Bible doctrines we must always use the scripture as our guide and practice. For Baptists, two of the most important doctrines are Baptism and The Lord’s Supper. These are the only two doctrines we recognize as Church Ordinances. The Bible is very clear in teaching how these doctrines are to be practiced and by whom.

      We only have two ordinances that we must never compromise or we risk our very existence, they are Baptism and The Lord’s Supper.

      The moment we deviate from the precise method God has prescribed we have started down the slippery slope of error. True Baptists have held fast to the original doctrine of The Lord’s Supper from the time of Christ and the Apostles.

      Unfortunately, in this day of what the Bible describes as the age of luke warmness, Baptists are becoming careless in regard to strictly following the pattern laid out for us in Scripture. Many of our Bible colleges are graduating otherwise sincere, Godly and dedicated pastors and teachers who have not been taught the very strict, biblical requirements that surround the Lord’s Supper. Any Bible college that neglects to teach its students the differences surrounding Closed Communion, Close Communion and Open Communion is not simply short changing its students; it is also not equipping their students to carry on sound Bible traditions. The result is men of God and churches that fall into error. And as we will see, this is serious error.

      Should we as Baptists ignore the restrictions made by our Lord and Master? NO! When we hold to the restrictions placed upon the Lord’s Supper by our Master, we are defending the "faith which was once delivered to the saints" Jude 3.

      The Lord’s Supper is rigidly restricted and I will show this in the following facts:

      IT IS RESTRICTED AS TO PLACE

      A. I Corinthians 11:18 says, "When ye come together in the church." This does not mean the church building; they had none. In other words, when the church assembles. The supper is to be observed by the church, in church capacity. Again this does not mean the church house. Ekklesia, the Greek word for church, means assembly. "When ye come together in the church," is when the church assembles.

      B. When we say church we mean an assembly of properly baptized believers. Acts 2:41-42: "Then they that gladly received his word were baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand souls. And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers."

      The church is made up of saved people who are baptized by immersion. In the Bible, belief precedes baptism. That’s the Bible way.

      Acts 8:12-13, "But when they believed Philip preaching the things concerning the kingdom of God, and the name of Jesus Christ, they were baptized, both men and women. Then Simon himself believed also: and when he was baptized, he continued with Philip, and wondered, beholding the miracles and signs which were done."

      When we say properly baptized, we mean immersed. No unbeliever should take the Lord’s supper, and no non-immersed believer should take the supper. Those who are sprinkled are not baptized and cannot receive the supper. The Greek word for baptize is baptizo, and it always means to immerse.

      "In every case where communion is referred to, or where it may possibly have been administered, the believers had been baptized Acts 2:42; 8:12; 8:38; 10:47; 6:14-15; 18:8; 20:7. Baptism comes before communion, just as repentance and faith precede baptism".

      C. The Lord’s Supper is for baptized believers in church capacity: "When ye come together in the church," again not a building, but the assembly of the properly baptized believers.

      D. The fact that the Lord’s Supper is a church ordinance, to be observed in church capacity, is pointed out by the fact that it is for those who have been immersed and added to the fellowship of the church.

      E. The Lord’s Supper is never spoken of in connection with individuals. When it is referred to, it is only referred to in reference to baptized believers in local church capacity I Cor. 11:20-26).

      I want to quote Dr. W.W. Hamilton,

      "The individual administration of the ordinance has no Bible warrant and is a relic of Romanism. The Lord’s Supper is a church ordinance, and anything which goes beyond or comes short of this fails for want of scriptural example or command".

      “The practice of taking a little communion kit to hospitals, nursing homes, etc. is unscriptural and does not follow the scriptural example.”

      IT IS RESTRICTED TO A UNITED CHURCH

      A. The Bible in I Cor. 11:18 is very strong in condemning divisions around the Lord’s table. For first of all, when ye come together in the church, I hear that there be divisions among you; and I partly believe it.
      19 For there must be also heresies among you, that they which are approved may be made manifest among you.
      20 When ye come together therefore into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's supper.

      There were no less than four divisions in the Corinthian church.
      I Cor. 1:12: "Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ."

      Because of these divisions, it was impossible for them to scripturally eat the Lord’s Supper. Division in the local church is reason to hold off observing the Lord’s Supper. But there are also other reasons to forego taking the Lord’s Supper. If there is gross sin in the membership we do not take it. Here is scriptural evidence for this: 1Co 5:7 Purge out therefore the old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, as ye are unleavened. For even Christ our Passover is sacrificed for us:
      8 Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, neither with the leaven of malice and wickedness; but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth. 9 I wrote unto you in an epistle not to company with fornicators:
      10 Yet not altogether with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or with idolaters; for then must ye needs go out of the world. 11 But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolater, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat.

      B. At this point, I want to ask these questions: Are there not doctrinal divisions among the many denominations? Is it not our doctrinal differences that cause us to be separate religious bodies?

      IT IS RESTRICTED BY DOCTRINE

      A. Those in the early church at Jerusalem who partook "continued stedfastly in the apostles’ doctrine" Acts 2:42. And they continued stedfastly in the apostles' doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.

      B. Those that do not hold to apostolic truth are not to partake. This means there is to be discipline in the local body. How can you discipline those who do not belong to the local body? You can’t. The clear command of scripture is to withdraw fellowship from those who are not doctrinally sound.

      II Thes 3:6: "Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us."
      Rom. 16:17: "Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which cause divisions and offences contrary to the doctrine which ye have learned; and avoid them."
      To commune together means to have the same doctrine.
      II Thes. 2:15: "Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle."
      II John 10-11: "If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds."

      C. Some Baptists in our day have watered down this doctrine by practicing what they call “Close Communion.” By this they mean that they believe that members of another Baptist church may take communion with us because they are of the same beliefs. Once again, this is unscriptural.

      The welcome to the Lord's Table should not be extended beyond the discipline of the local church. When we take the Lord’s Supper there is supposed to be no gross sin among us and no divisions among us. We have no idea of the spiritual condition of another church’s members. If there is sin or division in the case of this other church’s members, we have no way of knowing it. We cannot discipline them because they are not members of our church. This is why we practice “Closed” communion, meaning it is restricted solely to our church membership. 
      So then, in closing I would like to reiterate the three different ideas concerning the Lord’s Supper and who is to take it. 
      Closed Communion = Only members of a single local church. 
      Close Communion = Members of like faith and order may partake. 
      Open Communion = If you claim to be a Christian, or simply attending the service, you may partake. 
      It is no small thing to attempt to change that which was implemented by our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. 
      Mt. 28:20 Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen. 
      Many of our Baptist churches have a real need to consider the gravity of the act of observing The Lord’s Supper. It is not a light thing that is to be taken casually or without regard to the spiritual condition of ourselves or our church.
      1Co. 11:27 Wherefore whosoever shall eat this bread, and drink this cup of the Lord, unworthily, shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord.

       28 But let a man examine himself, and so let him eat of that bread, and drink of that cup.

       29 For he that eateth and drinketh unworthily, eateth and drinketh damnation to himself, not discerning the Lord's body.

       30 For this cause many are weak and sickly among you, and many sleep.

The United States! Vanity! How So?


Recommended Posts

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

Isaiah 40:17 “All nations before him are as nothing; and they are counted to him less than nothing, and vanity.”

Malachi 3:6a “For I am the LORD, I change not;”

 

I've looked at this some, and I have my own opinions about the questions below. I’m not looking at this from an eschatology (last things) perspective; I’m looking more at present/current events. One of my thoughts is, the U.S. may be practically insignificant before the ‘last things’ occur. I wondered if others have looked into this and what their own personal thoughts are. Folks from outside the U.S. are welcome to comment on their nation as well.

 

 

Does God’s immutability encompass judgment of nations today?

 

 

Can you sight Bible scripture references of God’s judgment of nations past?

 

 

Can you provide evidence of past judgment occurring in the U.S. (or your own nation) in the ‘new’ millennium?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

Isaiah 40:17 “All nations before him are as nothing; and they are counted to him less than nothing, and vanity.”

Malachi 3:6a “For I am the LORD, I change not;”

 

I've looked at this some, and I have my own opinions about the questions below. I’m not looking at this from an eschatology (last things) perspective; I’m looking more at present/current events. One of my thoughts is, the U.S. may be practically insignificant before the ‘last things’ occur. I wondered if others have looked into this and what their own personal thoughts are. Folks from outside the U.S. are welcome to comment on their nation as well.

 

 

Does God’s immutability encompass judgment of nations today?  Depends on how one looks at "judgment".

 

 

Can you sight Bible scripture references of God’s judgment of nations past?  How about Egypt??

 

 

Can you provide evidence of past judgment occurring in the U.S. (or your own nation) in the ‘new’ millennium? None that I can recall; then again I never really think about it. Refer to first answer above.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

I think nations are man made. God has no respect of persons and HE died for all. There's the vanity concerning nations, elected kings, presidents, princes, etc.

 

Ecclesiastes 1:2-3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

I think nations are man made. God has no respect of persons and HE died for all. There's the vanity concerning nations, elected kings, presidents, princes, etc.

 

Ecclesiastes 1:2-3

The framework for this post isn't discussing anything past your first comma.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

That God judges nations can not be disputed.
Jonah 3:
4  And Jonah began to enter into the city a day's journey, and he cried, and said, Yet forty days, and Nineveh shall be overthrown.

This what the Lord told Jonas to preach and it was based on chapter 1 where God commanded Jonah because:
Jonah 1:
 2  Arise, go to Nineveh, that great city, and cry against it; for their wickedness is come up before me.

So we can see judgement upon a city (not a nation but I think it applies), from God because of their wickedness.

Of course they repent at the preaching so the judgement is stayed.

The prOBlem I have with today is that people immediately claim God's judgements upon a nation when a natural disaster happens in say a Muslim nation, but deny the same when a natural disaster happens in a "Christian" nation.

In my view, yes God judges nations, but no man has the right or knowledge to make such a proclamation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

Sometimes God's judgment of a nation comes from Him turning the people over to their own sins.

 

Look at the "leadership" in America today. Look at the degradation and division and multiplying of sin through acceptance of homosexuality. Consider the excessive debt of the nation, States, cities and individuals. The porn industry in America takes in more money and exports more films than does Hollywood and their own ungodly movies. Then there is high divorce rates, millions of babies murdered through legal abortion, rampant unwed pregnancies, children growing up without fathers, shacking up as acceptable, temporary marriages, serial marriage/divorce/remarriages.

 

How much of this is a part of God's judgment, punishing us by allowing us to suffer the consequences of our own lust for sin?

 

That's just touching the surface. No doubt we could list a plethora of things that may be the hand of judgment upon America. The same is likely true for most other nations as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

Gods truths are the same today as in the old testament, God does not change and if America continues in it's sinful state Gods final judgment will soon come upon it just as His judgment has come upon many nations of old.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

The framework for this post isn't discussing anything past your first comma.

I was just showing with the scripture that all is vanity including everything after the first comma.

Unless God build the house we labour in vain.

 As far as trying answer the questions in reference with the scripture you gave I don't see how they go together. Sorry

 

Otherwise I think that the scripture quoted in my previous post is perfect commentary on the scripture that you quoted from Isaiah.

People see worldly divisions (countries) as super powers sometimes. Isaiah was writing to the captive Jews under the Roman world superpower. See how the verse is an encouragement and has nothing to do with God destroying anything.

 

God's judgement is sure but it is after all things have come to pass. Until then He is longsuffering and uses any means necessary to draw us unto Him. By natural or man made disasters if need be but I don't think that these are judgements they're just not harsh enough. Sodom and Gomorrah was judged but even Lot was removed first.

 

You OBviously have something in mind according to the original post. How about going into more detail about what you're thinking on this subject. Otherwise there is no answer to your questions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

I was just showing with the scripture that all is vanity including everything after the first comma.

Unless God build the house we labour in vain.

 As far as trying answer the questions in reference with the scripture you gave I don't see how they go together. Sorry

 

Otherwise I think that the scripture quoted in my previous post is perfect commentary on the scripture that you quoted from Isaiah.

People see worldly divisions (countries) as super powers sometimes. Isaiah was writing to the captive Jews under the Roman world superpower. See how the verse is an encouragement and has nothing to do with God destroying anything.

 

God's judgement is sure but it is after all things have come to pass. Until then He is longsuffering and uses any means necessary to draw us unto Him. By natural or man made disasters if need be but I don't think that these are judgements they're just not harsh enough. Sodom and Gomorrah was judged but even Lot was removed first.

 

You OBviously have something in mind according to the original post. How about going into more detail about what you're thinking on this subject. Otherwise there is no answer to your questions.

There is no "hidden agenda" if you have no answer then, let your yea be yea and your nay be nay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

Sometimes God's judgment of a nation comes from Him turning the people over to their own sins.

 

Look at the "leadership" in America today. Look at the degradation and division and multiplying of sin through acceptance of homosexuality. Consider the excessive debt of the nation, States, cities and individuals. The porn industry in America takes in more money and exports more films than does Hollywood and their own ungodly movies. Then there is high divorce rates, millions of babies murdered through legal abortion, rampant unwed pregnancies, children growing up without fathers, shacking up as acceptable, temporary marriages, serial marriage/divorce/remarriages.

 

How much of this is a part of God's judgment, punishing us by allowing us to suffer the consequences of our own lust for sin?

 

That's just touching the surface. No doubt we could list a plethora of things that may be the hand of judgment upon America. The same is likely true for most other nations as well.

I think you and I have agreed about this before...the U.S. is not necessarily receiving judgement... God is no longer staying the results of our own (as a nation) sin and wickedness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 8 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...