Jump to content
Online Baptist Community

Tradition - what are your thoughts?


Guest "I am chief"
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • IFB

No I did not say that we have no custom, tradition. We have many traditions, we have church services on Sunday morning. Generally we start with the tradition of singing hymns and praying, we have the tradition of that starting at 10:00 AM. After the hymns we have the traditions of having Sunday school. We have the tradition of Sunday school ending before 11:00 AM. Generally at 11:00 AM we have the tradition, custom, of starting off with some hymns. After which we have the tradition of saying a prayer and taking up the offering. Generally after that we have the tradition of singing a few more songs, maybe more prayers, them having the preaching services.

We also have the custom, tradition, of having Sunday night services.

Jesus held to a tradition in order to teach us to attend public worship, notice His custom in the verse below.

Lu 4:16 And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his
custom was, he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up for
to read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member

The core doctrines of IFB, & FIEC are clearly taught in Scripture. There are other doctrines that are derived from Scripture, but are received by tradition, i.e. taught by respected Bible teachers, & accepted as Scripture teaching.

These are the doctrines that are discussed & disputed here. We may be convinced by the logic, but others may be equally convinced otherwise.

In particular, no-one can prove dispensationalism from Scripture. You accept it as "received truth" & refer to various Scriptures to support the doctrine, but which do not teach the doctrine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
In particular, no-one can prove dispensationalism from Scripture. You accept it as "received truth" & refer to various Scriptures to support the doctrine, but which do not teach the doctrine.

With all due respect, you view/interpret Scripture through a different filter than we do, based on the postings you've made in numerous threads. We're more than happy to explain why we believe what we do and to allow you to explain why you believe the way you do - but that doesn't mean you have the right to come onto our board and tell us we're wrong and expect to be welcome here.
Link to comment
Share on other sites




These are the doctrines that are discussed & disputed here. We may be convinced by the logic, but others may be equally convinced otherwise.



How can you truly be convinced of something logically and someone else also be convience of something totally opposite by logic; that is illogical.

You can not say that both X and not-X are true.
Link to comment
Share on other sites



With all due respect, you view/interpret Scripture through a different filter than we do, based on the postings you've made in numerous threads. We're more than happy to explain why we believe what we do and to allow you to explain why you believe the way you do - but that doesn't mean you have the right to come onto our board and tell us we're wrong and expect to be welcome here.


With all due respect, shouldn't we all view scripture thourgh the same filter?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • IFB



With all due respect, shouldn't we all view scripture thourgh the same filter?


He is obviously not Baptist, or if he is its no Baptist Teachings I have ever heard, so the moderator said what I am placing in bold letters above.

For instants, if, that is if I went to say a Roman Catholic message board and started declaring everyone of them was wrong, I would have no right to think that they would make me feel welcomed me with open arms. Yet if I went to their message board to learn about them, ask a question, discuss issues, not coming out saying that they were wrong, them I feel they would welcome me.

At the beginning I used two ifs for a very good reason, I do not go to message boards of those who believe different than us. And I sure would not go to them declaring that they are wrong, there is such a thing as respect, respect what others believe.

I'm here hoping to speak to and with like minded people, not those of other beliefs.Of course other beliefs are welcome, if they will stay clam, show respect, and respect our beliefs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites


No I did not say that we have no custom, tradition. We have many traditions, we have church services on Sunday morning. Generally we start with the tradition of singing hymns and praying, we have the tradition of that starting at 10:00 AM. After the hymns we have the traditions of having Sunday school. We have the tradition of Sunday school ending before 11:00 AM. Generally at 11:00 AM we have the tradition, custom, of starting off with some hymns. After which we have the tradition of saying a prayer and taking up the offering. Generally after that we have the tradition of singing a few more songs, maybe more prayers, them having the preaching services.

We also have the custom, tradition, of having Sunday night services.

Jesus held to a tradition in order to teach us to attend public worship, notice His custom in the verse below.

Lu 4:16 And he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up: and, as his
custom was, he went into the synagogue on the sabbath day, and stood up for
to read.


Jerry,

Thank you for clearing that up for me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites





Paul was speaking of Biblical Doctrine, not denominational doctrine.


Thanks for clearing that up; as long as we understand that its just your denomination's ideas you present. We can live with that and take it with a grain of salt.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member



With all due respect, shouldn't we all view scripture thourgh the same filter?


Yes, we should view Scripture as God intended, but our own biases/viewpoints/beliefs, etc., can influence how we interpret certain passages of Scripture. That's what has led to the multiple denominations we have today. There are different viewpoints even among IFSB folks, i.e., dispensationalism vs convenant theology. Depending on which of those you believe determines how you would interpret certain Scriptures.

In another thread, someone asked if a pastor is qualified if he marries a divorced woman, even though she would be his only wife. I believe that would disqualify a man from the pastorate based on my reading of Luke 16:18. But other IFSB churches don't see that situation as a disqualifier.
Link to comment
Share on other sites




Yes, we should view Scripture as God intended, but our own biases/viewpoints/beliefs, etc., can influence how we interpret certain passages of Scripture. That's what has led to the multiple denominations we have today. There are different viewpoints even among IFSB folks, i.e., dispensationalism vs convenant theology. Depending on which of those you believe determines how you would interpret certain Scriptures.

In another thread, someone asked if a pastor is qualified if he marries a divorced woman, even though she would be his only wife. I believe that would disqualify a man from the pastorate based on my reading of Luke 16:18. But other IFSB churches don't see that situation as a disqualifier.



But, when we begin to allow "our own biases/viewpoints/beliefs, etc," to cloud how we interpret scripture, we are failing to please God. We are to "interpret" scripture through scripture not through our own view point. I don't deny that you are correct in what you say about allowing our own biases to get in the way but that does not make it right. Perhaps that is why we have so many denominations.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
But, when we begin to allow "our own biases/viewpoints/beliefs, etc," to cloud how we interpret scripture, we are failing to please God. We are to "interpret" scripture through scripture not through our own view point. I don't deny that you are correct in what you say about allowing our own biases to get in the way but that does not make it right. Perhaps that is why we have so many denominations.


I agree - you're preaching to the choir. It bothers me when people (including pastors) say, "This is what God told me about this passage" and it goes against what God taught me about the same passage. Both can't be right.
Link to comment
Share on other sites




I agree - you're preaching to the choir. It bothers me when people (including pastors) say, "This is what God told me about this passage" and it goes against what God taught me about the same passage. Both can't be right.


Both arn't right. It is sad to see so many who willfully or blindly choose to believe those things which are so clearly false. It saddens me to see those who get mad when someone honestly points out the error of their way rather than openly seeing the truth.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Advanced Member
Yes, we should view Scripture as God intended, but our own biases/viewpoints/beliefs, etc., can influence how we interpret certain passages of Scripture. That's what has led to the multiple denominations we have today. There are different viewpoints even among IFSB folks, i.e., dispensationalism vs convenant theology. Depending on which of those you believe determines how you would interpret certain Scriptures.

Do our viewpoints begin with Scripture, or with what we are taught? (i.e. tradition, because we are taught by sermons rather than systematic Bible study.) Also it is the teaching of our first Pastor/elder that gives us our basic understanding of Scripture. As we mature in the faith, search the Scriptures & read books, & discuss theology, our views develop & may change.

I know that some on this forum disagree with my covenant theology, but "covenant" (or "testament") occurs over 300 times in Scripture, & our Bibles are divided into only 2 Testaments. "Dispensation" does not occur in the OT & in the 4 times in the NT, means "stewardship" rather than the meaning given by dispensationalists.

I am charged with coming here & trying to change the views of IFBs. Is there a consistent belief system for IFBs & eschatology? Has this site a doctrinal basis? The British FIEC has a basis of faith that is basically I, F, & B, deliberately framed to allow for disagreement on matters where Bible-believing evangelicals disagree.

8. BAPTISM AND THE LORD'S SUPPER
Baptism and the Lord's Supper have been given to the churches by Christ as visible signs of the gospel. Baptism is a symbol of union with Christ and entry into his Church but does not impart spiritual life. The Lord's Supper is a commemoration of Christ's sacrifice offered once for all and involves no change in the bread and wine. All its blessings are received by faith.

9. THE FUTURE
The Lord Jesus Christ will return in glory. He will raise the dead and judge the world in righteousness. The wicked will be sent to eternal punishment and the righteous will be welcomed into a life of eternal joy in fellowship with God. God will make all things new and will be glorified forever.

The mode of baptism is not specified, nor is there a statement on the millennium.
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Do our viewpoints begin with Scripture, or with what we are taught? (i.e. tradition, because we are taught by sermons rather than systematic Bible study.) Also it is the teaching of our first Pastor/elder that gives us our basic understanding of Scripture. As we mature in the faith, search the Scriptures & read books, & discuss theology, our views develop & may change.

I know that some on this forum disagree with my covenant theology, but "covenant" (or "testament") occurs over 300 times in Scripture, & our Bibles are divided into only 2 Testaments. "Dispensation" does not occur in the OT & in the 4 times in the NT, means "stewardship" rather than the meaning given by dispensationalists.

I am charged with coming here & trying to change the views of IFBs. Is there a consistent belief system for IFBs & eschatology? Has this site a doctrinal basis? The British FIEC has a basis of faith that is basically I, F, & B, deliberately framed to allow for disagreement on matters where Bible-believing evangelicals disagree.


The mode of baptism is not specified, nor is there a statement on the millennium.


The question isn't whether I began "my viewpoints" with someone teaching me but was that teaching from the Word of God. If you teach me A and it is not from the Word of God then I must reject A. My beliefs are to begin and end with the Word of God since it is the only source of authority which I have.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • IFB



I agree - you're preaching to the choir. It bothers me when people (including pastors) say, "This is what God told me about this passage" and it goes against what God taught me about the same passage. Both can't be right.


Bit off topic, maybe.

It gets me when you have those people that says two people who have a different opinion are both right, he is right to do what he does in his church and or situation, your right to do what you did in your church or situation. I fail how anyone can come to that conclusion, that two opinions that contradict each other can both be right.

It would be nice if there was some way for each of us to remove the influence that the world has on us when it comes to determining what is right in the sight of God. Some seem to claim they can and will be quick to tell you that they're always right.

I know of 2, or maybe 3, churches that ordained a pastor that was married to a divorce woman, 2 churches that ordained a pastor that was divorced and remarried. I was totally shocked at the churches that did this.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • IFB


Do our viewpoints begin with Scripture, or with what we are taught? (i.e. tradition, because we are taught by sermons rather than systematic Bible study.) Also it is the teaching of our first Pastor/elder that gives us our basic understanding of Scripture. As we mature in the faith, search the Scriptures & read books, & discuss theology, our views develop & may change.

I know that some on this forum disagree with my covenant theology, but "covenant" (or "testament") occurs over 300 times in Scripture, & our Bibles are divided into only 2 Testaments. "Dispensation" does not occur in the OT & in the 4 times in the NT, means "stewardship" rather than the meaning given by dispensationalists.

I am charged with coming here & trying to change the views of IFBs. Is there a consistent belief system for IFBs & eschatology? Has this site a doctrinal basis? The British FIEC has a basis of faith that is basically I, F, & B, deliberately framed to allow for disagreement on matters where Bible-believing evangelicals disagree.


The mode of baptism is not specified, nor is there a statement on the millennium.


Your charged with coming here? What does that mean? If that is so, perhaps you should not be here. Yes, if what I put in bold above is true, you should be sent on your happy way.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share



  • Recent Achievements

    • Saved_by_Grace earned a badge
      First Post
    • Lillian earned a badge
      First Post
    • Ann B earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • auburn_tiger went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Rando earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Tell a friend

    Love Online Baptist Community? Tell a friend!
  • Members

  • Recent Status Updates

    • Eagle One

      Havent been on for years, but have been studying with Jews for Jesus weekly Bible Study which has been wonderful.  Not sure any of your views on that group, but if you are from a Jewish background a great place to be grounded in the word and to learn.
      · 0 replies
    • Barbara Ann

      I am a researcher and writer at Watch Unto Prayer which I started 25 years ago. On this website there are many well-documented articles and audio programs by myself and other researchers whose ministry is to expose the endtime apostasy of the Church. Now more than ever Christians need information in order to identify and avoid the various deceptions that are in nearly all the churches.
      My husband and I attended the IFB Bible Baptist Church of James Knox a couple of years ago. We left the church after we were informed by the assistant pastor that we were not allowed to express views to other members that do not agree with the views of the pastor and leaders of the church. We were not introducing heresy but expressing our views concerning the State of Israel. We had never been in a church which forbade private conversations on issues where there are diverse opinions. This we recognized as cultlike control of church members. To inform Christians, my husband, who is also a researcher and writer, started a website on the subject: Zionism Exposed: A Watchman Ministry.
      · 0 replies
    • Free Spirit

      Jesus said:"I am the truth, the way, and the life. No man can come to The Father, but by Me."
      · 0 replies
    • Richg  »  BrotherTony

      Brother Tony, I read your reply on Anderson, I know you all think I'm argumentative but, when you don't agree.....the first thought I had is, I wish you would introduce me to the guy that hasn't sinned, maybe David, that had a man killed so he could commit adultery, yet, he was & is a man after Gods own heart, or maybe Paul the guy that persecuted and had Christians killed, or maybe Richg or Kent H, or even you ! I used to listen to personalities also when I was younger but today and for some time, my only concern is, does it line up with scripture & to me its hilarious that you think "I'm in a fix" LOL, I interpreted what we've discussed perfectly, not because I'm smart, but because with an open mind to things of God, its an easy read.
      · 1 reply
    • Richg  »  Jerry

      I thought you wanted me to stop talking to you !
      · 0 replies
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...