Members JerryNumbers Posted January 3, 2009 Members Share Posted January 3, 2009 Microsoft quietly extends Windows XP lifecycle, againhttp://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/40676/140/ May Windows XP have a long life. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted January 28, 2009 Share Posted January 28, 2009 Hooray! :tum Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JerryNumbers Posted January 30, 2009 Author Members Share Posted January 30, 2009 Right on, this old man is not wanting to change any time soon. Especially if its not an improvement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Danny Carlton Posted January 30, 2009 Members Share Posted January 30, 2009 I have the old blog posts to prove that I had even more frustration with XP than I am now having with Vista. It's just a change problem. Vista is a good OS. Matter of fact, my wife (who has XP on her laptop) has to reboot more often than I do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members anime4christ Posted January 31, 2009 Members Share Posted January 31, 2009 I have the old blog posts to prove that I had even more frustration with XP than I am now having with Vista. It's just a change problem. Vista is a good OS. Matter of fact' date=' my wife (who has XP on her laptop) has to reboot more often than I do.[/quote'] Vista had some improvements, but they also introduced more problems than I can personally work with, so it all comes down to preference, IMO. Now, I tried Windows 7 beta, and I think it's better than Vista. Windows 7 is an incremental build over Vista and is more of the quality that Vista should have been in the first place. Vista feels like an alpha version of 7 (and 7 is still in beta). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Kubel Posted February 4, 2009 Members Share Posted February 4, 2009 I agree. Vista was a mistake that should have never happened. Windows 7 is just getting things right that Vista should have originally. And one of them is performance. I can say without a doubt Windows 7 is as fast as (if not faster than) Windows XP SP3, and this is on a lowly Eee PC 900HA (1.6GHz Atom N270, 945GSE, 2GB RAM). The only problem I'm having with it are a few bugs (can't plug in an external monitor or I'll get a BSOD). Vista did take some getting used to, but that wasn't a major con. Performance issues and an early lack of mature drivers kept me from switching. Plus Vista performance isn't so great on netbooks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.