1Timothy115

Oh, yeah, it's arm dealers also but Biden, Pelosi, Romney and Kerry are all on the boards of Ukranian gas companies. I'm sure there are others also. 
All those weapons being ship through Benghazi up to the "freedom fighters" (aka ISIS) in Syria we're about fighting a proxy with Russia and that was, again, about a gas pipeline going through Syria.
Weapons have to be sold to a nation for a reason and the reason here is natural gas.
Remember, James said wars are fought over the lust for gold and natural gas is a resource that translate I to money.
There's nothing new under the sun.

Remember whomever main stream media and the like support you can be guaranteed are the bad guys, the corrupted ones in this conflict.
Globalists and Satanists too

Believe what you will, I can edit any time, even weeks later.

I'll have to check, but there may be a time limit set of 60 minutes to edit a post. 

Public posts are a matter of public record as well. I haven't seen it here much but in the past many people in certain forums would intentionally goad people into saying certain things then deleting key posts to make the person seem to say something they actually weren't.

You have the ability to edit your post, but not delete them. The reasoning for not being able to delete them is because then it is unfair to the those who posted after you. When members were deleting posts, the threads then did not make sense anymore and the context many times changed.
In reality, you are having a conversation. Once one person deletes part of the conversation, it can change the meaning. In that case the whole thread has to be removed and that is not fair to those who took the time to reply. 
I'll go check now to make sure, but we used to allow members to close the threads they started. That way if a person who starts a thread no longer wants that thread to go on, they can close it from future replies. 

"I went down into the garden of nuts to see the fruits of the valley," Songs 6:11
It reminds me of the joke about California. "The only thing that comes from California are fruits and nuts." Couldn't help the latter...old Navy humor. ?

"I went down into the garden of nuts to see the fruits of the valley," Songs 6:11
It reminds me of the joke about California. "The only thing that comes from California are fruits and nuts." Couldn't help the latter...old Navy humor. ?

As a Christian, someone who has put faith in trust in the redemptive work of Jesus Christ through His death on the cross and subsequent resurrection, our behavior mirrors, reflects and resembles Christ. Being gracious and merciful to others is behaving like Christ.
 
True Christians 

However, 'argument' is the use of words to support or defend a position in debate, as in "The speaker put forth too convincing of an argument to refute. Therefore, the opposing point of view of a homosexual gene was rejected.

I've heard it said, the results of a world-wide flood of this magnitude and duration may still be felt today. 

"I went down into the garden of nuts to see the fruits of the valley," Songs 6:11
It reminds me of the joke about California. "The only thing that comes from California are fruits and nuts." Couldn't help the latter...old Navy humor. ?

Methodism may be headed for a train wreck.
There were some who I heard say, "as long as they leave me alone, I don't care what they do." Sadly, I never challenged that line of reasoning. Now, fifty years later I regret not speaking out. Non-actions can have consequences (bad outcomes) too.

Sounds pretty good! We haven't had those in a year or so. Might have some this weekend! ?
For us, my wife asked me to make chicken strips and french fries with a side salad. We might eat some farm fresh corn-on-the-cob as well. I made some last night and there are still two ears left. 

My wife fixed me fried green tomatoes, yum yum.

Okay, let’s get back to the topic. 

Not in any IFB I've ever been associated with,,, and there are many. Maybe in one of your SBC more liberal churches but IFB KJV churches NO.

I won't use it again since it's been pointed out as offensive. Thanks for the heads up. 

Nevertheless, it is vulgar and rude and should not be used here. Stop arguing with the mods, Tony.

Whether the current translators changed the text or an earlier copier or editor does not matter - what matters is God inspired it one way or the other and somewhere along the way someone changed it. From what I understand of the Bible, lost human nature, and spiritual warfare - unless it was one copy being different because of accidently transcribing a word wrong (which can usually be proven or determined by comparing similar manuscripts), usually the changes are deliberate and demonic (ie. the source of Bible corruption is ultimately the Devil and his fallen angels and those who listen to them).
The Devil is real, hates the Word of God, God Himself and His people, and therefore is determined to wipe out the Word of God or corrupt it over time. We see that result in the Critical Text manuscripts and the versions translated from them. It doesn't matter if the corruption starts in their Hebrew and Greek (and Latin) manuscripts and lexicons or in the minds of the modern version translators, it is there now, and can be seen and compared to the preserved Greek Textus Receptus and Hebrew Masoretic Text, and the sound lexicons and foreign language translations that came from them.

23 And these three men, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, fell down bound into the midst of the burning fiery furnace. 24 Then Nebuchadnezzar the king was astonied, and rose up in haste, and spake, and said unto his counsellors, Did not we cast three men bound into the midst of the fire? They answered and said unto the king, True, O king.
 25 He answered and said, Lo, I see four men loose, walking in the midst of the fire, and they have no hurt; and the form of the fourth is like the Son of God. 26 Then Nebuchadnezzar came near to the mouth of the burning fiery furnace, and spake, and said, Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, ye servants of the most high God, come forth, and come hither. Then Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, came forth of the midst of the fire. 27 And the princes, governors, and captains, and the king's counsellors, being gathered together, saw these men, upon whose bodies the fire had no power, nor was an hair of their head singed, neither were their coats changed, nor the smell of fire had passed on them. 28 Then Nebuchadnezzar spake, and said, Blessed be the God of Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego, who hath sent his angel, and delivered his servants that trusted in him, and have changed the king's word, and yielded their bodies, that they might not serve nor worship any god, except their own God. Daniel 3:23-28
Was it pre-incarnate Christ or an angel sent by our Lord?
 

Pre incarnate Christ
 
angel can be used to to mean ‘appearance’

I've never heard of it being presented as anything other than Christ. As Hugh has pointed out, "angel" can be used to men "appearance." 

Lost Nebuchadnezzar said it was an angel (and Daniel recorded his statement). The Bible overall teaches these appearances are Christ before He came to earth as a man. The word angel also means messenger, and the context often shows what kind of messenger it was - ie. a heavenly messenger sent from God or God Himself (ie. the Son of God) appearing - though admittedly this particular passage does not specify.

I always heard the "unknown tongue" was a language from another nation, not what the charismatics make it out to be. The one scripture they point to more frequently is 1 Corinthians 13:1 "Though I speak with the tongues of men and of angels, and have not charity, I am become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal." and Paul is speaking of himself in this instance not of the church's ability. I've never been able to understand how they can base a doctrine on 1 Corinthians 12 and 13 and the Apostles in Acts.