Jump to content
Alan has gone on to be with the Lord ×
Online Baptist

DeaconDixon

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    51

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

2 Neutral

See reputation activity

About DeaconDixon

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male

Recent Profile Visitors

3,599 profile views
  1.    Believer (ish?) reacted to a sermon entry: Babies Go To Hell!
  2. DeaconDixon
    1 Tim.2:11-15 "Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence. For Adam was first formed, then Eve. And Adam was not deceived, but the woman being deceived was in the transgression. Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing"
  3. DeaconDixon
    Stand equal? Yes! Created equal? No! Praise! Deacon Dixon
  4. DeaconDixon
    Absolutely no disagreement with submitting to one another or with men loving our wives! Glory! Here's a short note I wrote some time ago, the prices of silver may have changed, but the principle of the message is eternal!
  5. DeaconDixon
    Eph.5:22-24 "Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, as unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife, even as Christ is the head of the church: and he is the saviour of the body. Therefore as the church is subject unto Christ, so let the wives be to their own husbands in every thing." 1 Cor.11:3 "But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God." 1 Cor.14:34-36 "Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obe
  6. DeaconDixon
    Correct! The anti-Calvinists/Cathlo-sympathizers may also claim that they'll repent or confess to their priest to be forgiven!
  7.    DeaconDixon reacted to a post in a topic: Here's Why We Are Against Abortion
  8.    DeaconDixon reacted to a post in a topic: Here's Why We Are Against Abortion
  9. DeaconDixon
    The Bible is very clear about the status of women. Yes, they are inferior to men. Because the Bible says so. That doesn't take away from one's familial love! I love my dogs, too, and they surely aren't of equal stature.
  10. DeaconDixon
    Another
  11. DeaconDixon
  12. DeaconDixon
    Then elaborate on this point! Furthermore, one of my associates presented a very simple tongue-in-cheek argument that if death in infancy ensures salvation then it is a very good idea to kill babies. The vast majority of the human race at present is NOT made up of true Christians (Bible-believing fundamentalists), so for a new born, odds are that he or she will grow up to become part of the hellbound majority. Death in infancy, therefore, would guard against that risk, and would be a small price to pay to ensure eternal bliss as opposed to eternal misery and torture.
  13. DeaconDixon
    http://youtu.be/8LEHYOuzKx8
  14. DeaconDixon
    I often preach about the women due to the fact that sisters of Eve are, by their inferiority, more inclined to sin then the men. But we must also talk about the men and their responsibility to their wives. Here's a good lesson from James the Preacher: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4jYrvaKbKQ Deacon Dixon
  15. DeaconDixon
    The following was penned down by a well respected affiate of one of my ministries. "Behold, I was shapen in iniquity: and in sin did my mother conceive me." - Psalms 51:5 There has of late been some discussion as to the destination of those who die in their infancy, before they are old enough to understand Jesus. Of course, the feel-good, tree-hugging, whale-loving liberals assert that God couldn't possibly send babies to hell as this would be "unfair" or "cruel", and that by some mysterious loophole in the rules for Salvation God allows those who are too young to be "accountable" into H
  16. DeaconDixon
    "Behold, I was shapen in iniquity: and in sin did my mother conceive me." - Psalms 51:5 There has of late been some discussion as to the destination of those who die in their infancy, before they are old enough to understand Jesus. Of course, the feel-good, tree-hugging, whale-loving liberals assert that God couldn't possibly send babies to hell as this would be "unfair" or "cruel", and that by some mysterious loophole in the rules for Salvation God allows those who are too young to be "accountable" into Heaven, no questions asked. As usual, the position of the lieberals in this debate fin
  17. DeaconDixon
    I personally think you, sadly, believe the unBiblical silliness that you're posting.
  18. DeaconDixon
    That woman was also not allowed to wear clothes of mixed fibers or eat a porkchop. Do you understand the difference from before and after Jesus?
×
×
  • Create New...