Jump to content

No Nicolaitans

Independent Fundamental Baptist
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


No Nicolaitans last won the day on October 13 2018

No Nicolaitans had the most liked content!


About No Nicolaitans

  • Rank
    Super Contributor

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location:
  • Denomination
  • IFB?

Recent Profile Visitors

16,566 profile views
  1. Those are your words, and that's what I believe you said, and my audience wants to hear it.
  2. Now thats I'a thinks bouts it, I's wondr'n, is that frase in the Sinasticus or that fanshy-smanshy Vinasticus manuscriptus? Kausin' it hain't ina my good ole' King James versy...
  3. Doesn't matter...just tell us what you believe about it. That's what matters...right?
  4. I don't know...you tell me. I'm sure you can tell us what you believe about it and what your audience wants to hear. By the way...it's bologna...not baloney. But you probably don't believe that, and nor does your audience...
  5. Perhaps the Holy Spirit could take lessons from you since you apparently know more than he does.... Wait a minute...were you just being facetious? Oh you silly boy!
  6. Why are you asking such a question? After all...you're a "Senior Member" here, and as such, you should know me well enough to know the answer to such a silly-willy question.
  7. I don't know...you tell me. I'm sure you can tell us what you believe or what your audience wants to hear about it.
  8. Oh dear...now I can't even trust you about the falsehood of Preterism... https://www.corvetteonline.com/news/ever-seen-a-ford-powered-c5-z06-vette-nows-your-chance/
  9. ...or maybe...just maybe...and I know this may sound completely whack-a-doodle...but m...a...y...b...e John said exactly what the Holy Spirit wanted him to say. I know...I know...just because the Holy Spirit is God, he doesn't really know all things. So the Holy Spirit didn't really understand the difference between a mark and a chip. I see...
  10. ...and you've spoken with the apostle John, and he confirmed that your interpretation is what he meant?
  11. Again I say, "Shame on you." The only thing that you have proven is that you believe certain things and that you assert that you have an audience who wants those certain things...the latter; of which, remains unproven...however, such a claim is believable considering the days in which we live...and that sir, is nothing to boast of. Shame on you.
  12. Now wait a minute... You reject the SDA's version and others because they're from false religions...BUT...you accept the Sinaiticus & Vaticanus even though they were discovered in the possession of false religions. Interesting... You sir, are the epitome of doing what's right in your own eyes. Your whole and continuous argument has consisted of absolutely nothing more than what you believe and what your supposed "audience" wants. Shame on you.
  13. Are we not commanded to study his word? What about this... And Jesus answered him, saying, It is written, That man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God. If God expects for us to study his word, and he expects for us to live by EVERY word, then we must have God's word in order to do that...right? Yet, if Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are his true words, why did God allow them to be kept hidden away from true believers by false religious systems? Why would God expect his children to study and live by his word when they didn't have access to it? Is that not a pretty big clue that false religious systems had those manuscripts?
  14. I wasn't insulted whatsoever. I thought the basis was that they are supposedly based on "older" manuscripts...aka...older is better. I'd much rather attempt to drive from Georgia to California in my wife's 2010 Jeep Compass than my 1998 Ford Escort ZX2. Older doesn't automatically mean better. Our son is 8; I'm 52. He can get around a lot better than I can... Last year, we replaced our roof, heat and air system, and water heater...because the older ones were no longer any good... Earlier this year, we had to replace our stove...the old one wasn't any good any longer... A couple of centuries ago, they used to bleed people in an attempt to get rid of health problems...I'll take today's newer health knowledge... London used to have their sewage running down the sides of their streets...I'll take today's newer sanitary sewage systems... Mark 16 doesn't belong in newer Bible versions that are based on those older...aka...better manuscripts... Doctrine is different in newer Bible versions that are based on those older...aka...better manuscripts... robycop3 says that he has been battling against false doctrine for the last 40 years... Hmmmmmm...now that's interesting.
  • Create New...