Jump to content
Online Baptist Community


Independent Fundamental Baptist
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


2Tim215 last won the day on April 5 2012

2Tim215 had the most liked content!

About 2Tim215

  • Birthday 04/09/1974

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location:
    South Africa
  • Denomination
  • IFB?

Recent Profile Visitors

5,425 profile views

2Tim215's Achievements

  1. Listened to some of your sermons yesterday. Such a blessing. Thank you
  2. Thanks Alan, appreciate it. I have never heard of any of these that you have mentioned. Will definitely look into these. My home church is 1000 kms away so and my wife and I are probably the only KJB believers in our town. Though I tell the truth to anyone who will listen none do these days Appreciate your candor Brother Scott
  3. Mind messaging me a few names that I can check out?
  4. Sadly for us who do not reside in the States where the KJB and IFB are strong we only see those in the limelight and on the web and I must say that it doesn't paint a pretty picture. I am blessed though that I have enough understanding and knowledge now that I can ignore it and sift through for what I need. So far I have only found one consistent online preacher who does not play that game.
  5. Haven't been on here in years but I can tell you from an outside perspective (foreign) that the constant in fighting, slandering, and arrogance of most IFB pastors is what is killing the KJB only to a certain degree.
  6. Not mad, don't get mad about doctrinal differences anymore. I do believe they are one and the same - different sides to the same coin if you will. I just like people to back up there statements with scripture. And yes, the entire bible does fall in line and though there were differing methods to people getting saved in the beginning chapters of the NT I understand the why and how so agree that this discussion will lead no where.
  7. So you are saying we can only be saved by Jesus's "gospel of the kingdom"? If you are we have a problem. It's very easy to throw thinly veiled insults and vague references to doctors and sheeple without actually giving evidence to your one salvation gospel. How I really hate it when people throw things out there as if it's THE truth and never giving scripture to back it up. They have the energy to type out hyperbole but never the energy to put in some scriptures to back up there claim. Give me some scriptures and then maybe we can continue this dialogue in a friendly and edifying manner. And whilst you are please point out the admittance of repentance of sin and the baptism by water for the thief on the cross. He did nothing more than accept his guilt, accept the innocence of Christ and ask to be remembered. Luke 23:39-43
  8. Here is a question: Which gospel saves? Jesus preached the gospel of the kingdom: Mat_4:23 And Jesus went about all Galilee, teaching in their synagogues, and preaching the gospel of the kingdom, Mat_24:14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come. Mar1:1 The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God; Mar_1:14 Now after that John was put in prison, Jesus came into Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God In Acts 15:7 we see salvation being of two parts 1. hearing the gospel and 2. believing it. In Acts 8 we see the gospel of the kingdom still being preached and this after the cross and then we see the Ethiopian being save by only believing Jesus to be the son of God and being baptized - kingdom gospel. So when did the gospel change? Acts 10 when Peter has his vision. Take note from vrs 34. Take particular note of : Act 10:43 To him give all the prophets witness, that through his name whosoever believeth in him shall receive remission of sins. And then take note how they were only baptized in water AFTER having received the Holy Ghost. That is why when peter stood up before everyone that was arguing the true methods of salvation and stated: And when there had been much disputing, Peter rose up, and said unto them, Men and brethren, ye know how that a good while ago God made choice among us, that the Gentiles by my mouth should hear the word of the gospel, and believe. And God, which knoweth the hearts, bare them witness, giving them the Holy Ghost, even as he did unto us; And put no difference between us and them, purifying their hearts by faith. EVERYONE "kept silence" So I ask "Now therefore why tempt ye God, to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers nor we were able to bear?"
  9. Hi All - thoughts on the below? Paradigm shifts, science and Systematic theology Theology Logos = Word and Logic Theo = Relating to God or deities Systematic In accordance to a fixed plan or system (structured, logical, orderly) – methodical (a systematic or established form of procedure) Therefore Systematic Theology is the ordered, logical, rational study of God and His character and nature as revealed to us through his Word. The original idea behind systematic theology is based on certain assumptions. Assumptions being “a thing that is accepted as true or as certain to happen, without proof” Science itself is also based on certain assumptions – these being: · There are natural causes for things that happen in the world around us. · Evidence from the natural world can be used to learn about those causes. · There is consistency in the causes that operate in the natural world. A scientific theory has hypotheses (also called axioms or assumptions) which determine the theory. I am using this example to clarify the term “assumptions”. That even the science we venerate above God is based on “assumptions” The assumptions for Systematic theology: · That God has revealed Himself to man not only through nature but through the writings of the prophets and apostles – His Word · That when God reveals Himself it is in accordance to His character. As He is not the author of confusion (1 Cor 14:33) His revealed Word will be orderly, clear, concise, consistent and meant to be intelligible. A further assumption would be that God’s revelation through the scriptures manifests the following attributes: · That there is UNITY in His Word. · That even though there is great diversity it all fits together and has unity in Him · That because of this UNITY there is COHERENCE in His Word · And finally, It is CONSISTENT as He is (Heb 13:8) My assumption would be that you have some knowledge of God’s Word, are saved and believe that His Word is entirely true and without error. Systematic Theology is the study of God through His Word using the system He provided. That system being a unified, logical, consistent, methodical, coherent planned study where the tiniest detail impacts and correlates EVERY other point in His Word. This is HIS system and the problem with Theology and any form of bible study today is that we impose our system and expect it to work and when it doesn’t we say the bible and by association God must be in error instead of us. All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. 2 Tim3:19-17 THIS IS THE PURPOSE AND FULL SCOPE OF THEOLOGY To be instructed by God through His Word to be equipped to do His will. Even though there are many competing systems of Systematic Theology that claim to be faithful to His Word we need to remember that these systems are not always infallible as man is fallible and that the doctrines revealed through these competing systems are to be tested. Some examples would be: · Dispensational Theology (Scofield) · Reformed theology · “Calvinism” (who did nothing more than repeat St Augustine and others before him) · Arminianism (free will) If these systems do not agree on the fundamental doctrines of the bible then the system is in error and one needs to test them. The study of Theology in any form is a science. The term science derived from the Latin word for Knowledge. Therefore through God’s revealed nature and character through His Word we have true knowledge of him (this presupposes you believe in God and the infallibility and inerrancy of His Word). So the science of Theology is to gain a coherent, consistent knowledge of God and His message. The only way theology could not be a science is if it was impossible for us to attain any knowledge of God. In science we have what is called Paradigm shifts. This is a fundamental change in our approach or underlying assumptions that make up a specific paradigm or scientific model. When this happens it is caused by anomalies within the model becoming more than what any scientist can ignore or easily explain away. Thomas Kuhn states a revolution occurs within the scientific community when anomalies occur that cannot be explained by the universally accepted paradigm. When the anomalies become too great to be ignored a paradigm shift occurs that usually ends up with battle lines being drawn by opposing scientists. A case in point would be the transition between Maxwellian electromagnetic worldview and the Einsteinian relativistic worldview, the earth is round versus the earth is flat, who revolves around who – the sun or the earth. These paradigm shifts after being resolved always end up with new knowledge being discovered and great progress being made in the sciences. However, paradigm shifts in Theology are never a good thing. The knowledge that God has revealed to us in His Word has not changed. It’s the same that has been studied by scholars for millennia. And it is highly unlikely that any will occur so why have they in this period of the 20th century? God’s Word is complete. There can be no knew discovery of knowledge of Him, only a deeper understanding as we diligently rightly divide. Any paradigm shifts in theology are never driven by new discoveries but rather by new philosophies driven by men that try to impose their system upon that of God’s. Or they try to achieve a synthesis between modern philosophies and teachings that are secular driven and impose those upon God’s Word again expecting it to work and when it doesn’t then the bible and by association God must be in error. Novelty in theology is dangerous. Novelty being the constant fascination with something new and the drive within the modern church to find new and fresh knowledge to achieve popularity, water down God’s Word and achieve momentary fame. Paul encountered this humane drive for constant new philosophies at Mars hill (Acts 17:21) We do need individual progress in our knowledge and understanding of God’s revealed knowledge but need to be very wary and circumspect of any “new” discovery that is not coherent, consistent and backed up by the scriptures in their entirety, not just a verse out of context here and there. Therefore the need for Systematic Theology The Word of God studied in a manner that follows His system revealed to us through his Character. · Logical · Consistent · Coherent · Unified · In context · Putting Him first and not the world A system where we take His Word in its ENTIRETY within CONTEXT and where EVERYTHING fits together. A system that does not cause confusion. His Word studied correctly will never cause confusion and we must never mistake our lack of understanding and knowledge as the fault of His Word, but rather search deeper and rightly divide.
  10. So is everyone else, including those that don't believe LOL I just find it amazing how we all give Him the glory in hindsight. It is our decisions and actions that get us into touble and then get us out of trouble (or keep us in trouble LOL) And yes it is being honest. I am not going to pretend I like Him when I can't stand Him any more. But then you lot wouldn't understand a crisis of faith if it came and slapped you in the face - you're all perfect little IFB's. Take a look arround you. Our "Father" gave this world to the devil and us with it. We are all "JOB's" in one form or another being punished for our faith while He sits back in silence and enjoys the show. Reality TV at it's best
  11. Amazing how we have been taught of God being like a "father". So what have I learnt in my 40 years on this earth? Not much. But in the last 2 years I have come to realise that I take better care of my 2 yr old daughter than God has ever taken care of His children! Or am I the only one honest enough to say this?
  12. Thanks all. Appreciate the input. Coventer's explanation was more to what I had in the back of my mind. There were many signs and wonders during the period of the crusifiction and ressurection. One has to back scripture with scripture and the one that comes to mind here is: 1Co 1:22 For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom:
  13. No it doesen't - Peter (Acts 2:14-21) makes it very clear that the prophecy of Joel was the explanation of what they were currently seeing at pentacost. So where is the "clear" distinction that these would only happen "before the notable day of the lord" if they happened at pentacost and the notable day of the lord hasen't come yet? For almost 2000 yrs now? It's is logical that those mentioned in vrs 19&20 have not come about but I am talking about vrs 17&18 - there is no clear distinction that these have ended nor come to an end. It simply states that this is what would happen in the last days, of which we are still living in. Or are we? How many last days can there be? Why do we teach that prophecy etc has come to an end? Or did the apostles not know what they were talking about here and litterally thought they were living in the last days and that the day of the lord would come about in there life time?
  14. So my understanding of it would be correct if I said that that prophecy of Joel's still stands today in our current time?
  • Create New...