Jump to content

Wilchbla

Advanced Member
  • Content Count

    2,411
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

Reputation Activity

  1. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from wretched in Remarriage   
    Yes, but this could be cleared up if the Christians make the right kind of animal sacrifices on Yom Kippur.
  2. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from dmedicinus in Can someone please explain to me why the KJV Bible is superior?   
    The "proof is in the pudding." The KJV has produced more fruit than all the other versions combined. All your great revivals have ended in America since the new version came out. Except for Sunday and Graham who both used KJVs. (We'll, Graham was quoted once as saying, "When I want results I use the KJV").

    The men behind the translation. Though the may have not all been straight doctrinally they were some of the holiest and God-fearing men. And they were very, very intelligent. Many of your new versions were had unsaved reprobates and perverts TRANSLATING the bible. (Whatever may be said about King James, whether true or false, he DID NOT TRANSLATE the KJV).

    The KJV is the only version that claims preservation and has supporters who claim it is pure and without error. You will not find this with any other English version that I know off.

    Finally, though lazy Christians claim it is hard to READ it has been scientifically proven to be the easiest version to UNDERSTAND. There is something about the King's English that is very clear and to the point. The English launguage was at its best at this time in history.
  3. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from Miss Daisy in Can someone please explain to me why the KJV Bible is superior?   
    What you just said doesn't make sense. It sounds BIG, but it doesn't make sense. The lady asked for LAYMENS terms, which you did not respond in, in why the KJV is superior ( I assumed she meant to all other ENGLISH versions). Going into mss or textual evidences is NOT LAYMENS terms. It's more of the same endless debating which doesn't edify. She asked why the KJV is superior and I gave her EMPIRICAL EVIDENCES which cannot be argued.

    As Christ said, "by their fruits, ye shall know them."
  4. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from Alan in New Name for IFBs   
    No matter what term you come up to explain fundamentalist it will always be turned into a negative meaning by the media.
  5. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from Doc Flay in New Name for IFBs   
    No matter what term you come up to explain fundamentalist it will always be turned into a negative meaning by the media.
  6. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from Ukulelemike in New Name for IFBs   
    No matter what term you come up to explain fundamentalist it will always be turned into a negative meaning by the media.
  7. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from PastorMatt in Christian Day at the Ballpark   
    I credit my salvation to the guy who was holding up the John 3:16 sign at the Red Sox/ Mets World Series in '86. I kept wondering what it meant then finally for some reason it occurred to me that it was a bible verse so I looked it up in my mother's old KJV bible. That was probably the first clear presentation of the gospel I ever received. They banned that sign at Shea Stadium the following season.
  8. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from KAT in The Gap (Daniel 11:33-35)   
    John Darby did not "invent" dispensationlism he was just the first to lay it out in systematic form. The theology had been around in one form or another since 400 AD.

    The fact that it took this long to lay it out in systematic form does not suggest that it is heresy but rather that the church was not ready for the teaching yet and that people were still crawling out from the imposed spiritual darkness of the Catholic Church for 1,500 years. Jesus said that the Comforter would reveal "things to come" and would bring things to rememberance to the believer. Well, he had a lot of catching up to do. Don't forget, in Darby's time the Exquistion (the last of the four of them) was just coming to an end. The same argument about being no evidence of dispensationalism before Darby is similar to the argument used against KJV bible believers about the location of the pure word of God before 1611. It's the same line of reasoning. Anotherwards that if you couldn't find it that means it must not be true.

    Also, the fact that we are getting closer to the end and the day of the Lord and with Israel back in the land it only makes sense that these deeper truths of the scriptures would be revealed. Dispensationalism was a major reason the Jews were placed back in Palestine in 1918. Try studying that some time and you'll find it's true. So true that many so-called Christians are blaming C.I. Scofield for the mess in the Middle East right now.
  9. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from KAT in Are Pastoral Disqualifications Permanent?   
    This "husband of two wives" thing is crazy. I know of a Christian man who wanted to be a pastor but was told by a pastor that he would have to leave his saved wife whom he married not too long after being saved and go back to his unsaved wife he was married to while he was unsaved. If not then he was disqualified because he had "two living wives".

    The passage is clearly about polygamy.

    The gifts and callings of God are without repentance. If God calls a man to the pastorate then he is a pastor no matter what and this can't be taken away. He may place himself in a difficult position to be a pastor through certain behavior though. If a group of people don't care if the man was divorced and they want him as their pastor then he should be their pastor no matter what some IFB pharisee says.

    The "qualifications" which Paul spoke of were qualifications before society NOT God.
  10. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from 20JC12 in Windows 8: Hate It Already? Why Waiting For Windows 9 Won't Help   
    95 was good but primitive. 98 was a very good OS. Windows Me and 2000 were both terrible.

    I also have Ubuntu installed on my computer. I would recommend it to anyone who is tired of Windows. It's free to download too.
  11. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from DPC27 in Divorce, Remarriage, And Ministry   
    Husband of one wife is speaking about polygamy plain and simple. The practice was still common in that time of history though it was despised by the Romans and Greeks and falling out of favor among the Jews. I'm sure some of Paul converts were polygamists. He wasn't about to tell them to dumped all their wives except one but did want to make sure no one who was appointed a deacon who also was a polygamist. Especially since the Romans hated the practice so much. You might find some misguided converts trying to use the OT also to justify the practice.

    Now that the practice is pretty much banished in Ameirca and many parts of the world it seems some Christians want to apply the verse to remarriage since they have to have something to apply the verse to. They forget that much of the world still practices polygamy and this verse is for the pastors in those nations.

    It's kind of like how some Christians will use the verses concerning the master/servent relationship and apply it to you obeying your boss, government offical or even pastor like you were a slave. I've heard the passage preached this way before. Again, they feel they have to have something to apply it to since slavery has been abolished in this part of the world. Yet, they forget that slavery still exists in many parts of the world and that there may be Christians who are still slaves.

    By the way, I have no problem with a divorced and remarried pastor depending on the circumstances. With womens lib you are going to find more and more divorced pastors. Also, just because a man's wife is out of control doesn't mean his disqualified in my book. God's "wife" Israel was out of control also and he put her away and remarried (Ezekiel 16).
  12. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from whisperingsage in Post tribulational   
    Wasn't talking to you. I was talking to John and I've noticed over the last few years he's ever so slowly abandoning his views for reformed doctrine.

    If nobody believes what I say about the end result, concerning Israel, of adopting the post-trib non dispensational view of scripture just ask the fellows in here who adopt this view about their position concerning Israel. Nobody has seemed to call them on this yet. You'll see that all those who hold to the reform doctrine/replacement theological view of scripture ultimately have the same atitude towards modern day Israel. And when I say "Israel" I don't mean the church but modern day coporate, national Israel located in Palestine. You have to be clear about this because whenever you say or read the word "Israel" you might be referring to the literal nation of Israel while they are referring to the church.It's a form of double-speak. Another thing you'll notice about those who hold to replacement theology/reformed doctrine is that everytime there is a positive promise towards Israel they wrest them away and apply them to the church (i.e. body of believers) but everytime there is a negative promise towards Israel they make sure that it only applies to the literally, corporate nation of Israel. In every case they do this. Don't believe me. Call them on it.
  13. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from KiwiChristian in Post tribulational   
    Wasn't talking to you. I was talking to John and I've noticed over the last few years he's ever so slowly abandoning his views for reformed doctrine.

    If nobody believes what I say about the end result, concerning Israel, of adopting the post-trib non dispensational view of scripture just ask the fellows in here who adopt this view about their position concerning Israel. Nobody has seemed to call them on this yet. You'll see that all those who hold to the reform doctrine/replacement theological view of scripture ultimately have the same atitude towards modern day Israel. And when I say "Israel" I don't mean the church but modern day coporate, national Israel located in Palestine. You have to be clear about this because whenever you say or read the word "Israel" you might be referring to the literal nation of Israel while they are referring to the church.It's a form of double-speak. Another thing you'll notice about those who hold to replacement theology/reformed doctrine is that everytime there is a positive promise towards Israel they wrest them away and apply them to the church (i.e. body of believers) but everytime there is a negative promise towards Israel they make sure that it only applies to the literally, corporate nation of Israel. In every case they do this. Don't believe me. Call them on it.
  14. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from Ukulelemike in Good Study Bible   
    Yes, the same goes Abraham, Peter, Paul, David, Solomon, etc. etc. Many IFBers would have nothing to do with them. Yet, somehow John Calvin is still worshiped even after condemning people to death, setting up a church state and birthing some of the most heretical doctrines. But like someone has pointed out, a broken marriage is the only unforgivable sin among IFBers.
  15. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from Doc Flay in Tracts   
    True, but I don't think being loud or messy should qualify someone as being lost.
  16. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from irishman in Jack Schaap Headed For Prison   
    Are you serious? You really do have some issues with that church don't you. It seems the only time you come into this forum it's for the purpose of nailing Jack Hyles and First Baptist. This makes me think there is a deeper issue going on with YOU.

    If the church was so corrupt they wouldn't have outed him. If he was so corrupt I guarantee he wouldn't have laid down so easily for the law.
  17. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from Doc Flay in Where In The Bible Does It Say...   
    This isn't the verse but it came to mind anyway when reading your question:

    Proverbs 11:21- Though hand join in hand, the wicked shall not be unpunished: but the seed of the righteous shall be delivered.

    All the "Kumbaya" moments the liberals have together won't stop the inevitable.
  18. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from Doc Flay in How To Leave A Church Without Causing Strife   
    Just leave. You shouldn't have to say anything unless asked and even then you really don't have to tell them why. I've left churches before and I don't even know if they noticed or cared. I never heard anything from them. Maybe if you have a closer relationship with some members, especially those who have helped you out, you can mention to them in private why you are leaving.

    Also, don't ever think you can save a church by staying. You won't and if anything you'll cause more problems.
  19. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from 20JC12 in Jesus Said To Them, “My Wife ...” Could It Be Far Fetched?   
    The feminists love this stuff. This could be the break they are hoping for to help them completely take over the churches as they are taking over the government, schools, businesses, etc. If they can "prove" that Jesus was married then they can claim that Jesus passed the headship of the church over to Mary Magdalene.

    If this papyrus is real it is nothing but Gnostic rubbish that was meant to remain buried. The apostle John dealt with these blasphemous heretics in I John. It seems that this heresy will rear it's ugly head again during the last days of the church as it did in the beginning days.

    Oh, and Jesus is married. He is married to the church. (II Cor 11:2)
  20. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from swathdiver in Jesus Said To Them, “My Wife ...” Could It Be Far Fetched?   
    The feminists love this stuff. This could be the break they are hoping for to help them completely take over the churches as they are taking over the government, schools, businesses, etc. If they can "prove" that Jesus was married then they can claim that Jesus passed the headship of the church over to Mary Magdalene.

    If this papyrus is real it is nothing but Gnostic rubbish that was meant to remain buried. The apostle John dealt with these blasphemous heretics in I John. It seems that this heresy will rear it's ugly head again during the last days of the church as it did in the beginning days.

    Oh, and Jesus is married. He is married to the church. (II Cor 11:2)
  21. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from HappyChristian in Jesus Said To Them, “My Wife ...” Could It Be Far Fetched?   
    The feminists love this stuff. This could be the break they are hoping for to help them completely take over the churches as they are taking over the government, schools, businesses, etc. If they can "prove" that Jesus was married then they can claim that Jesus passed the headship of the church over to Mary Magdalene.

    If this papyrus is real it is nothing but Gnostic rubbish that was meant to remain buried. The apostle John dealt with these blasphemous heretics in I John. It seems that this heresy will rear it's ugly head again during the last days of the church as it did in the beginning days.

    Oh, and Jesus is married. He is married to the church. (II Cor 11:2)
  22. Thanks
    Wilchbla got a reaction from Fixation in Jesus Said To Them, “My Wife ...” Could It Be Far Fetched?   
    The feminists love this stuff. This could be the break they are hoping for to help them completely take over the churches as they are taking over the government, schools, businesses, etc. If they can "prove" that Jesus was married then they can claim that Jesus passed the headship of the church over to Mary Magdalene.

    If this papyrus is real it is nothing but Gnostic rubbish that was meant to remain buried. The apostle John dealt with these blasphemous heretics in I John. It seems that this heresy will rear it's ugly head again during the last days of the church as it did in the beginning days.

    Oh, and Jesus is married. He is married to the church. (II Cor 11:2)
  23. Thanks
    Wilchbla reacted to 20JC12 in Delaware: 1St State To Jail Parents Who Use Spanking To Discipline   
    Welcome to communist Russia my friends...
  24. Thanks
    Wilchbla reacted to HappyChristian in Christian Schools - How Much?   
    Swath, I'm addressing this as a moderator here: the tone of this post is absolutely unnecessary. YOU are not the decider as to who is obeying the Lord or not re:education of their children. Please refrain, in the future, from asserting that someone who doesn't believe and practice what you do re: education is not obeying the Lord. You do not know the hearts, and you do not know how God is working in individual lives. So do not continue in that vein (and that goes for anyone else who wants to take up the mantle). Thank you.

    ~~~~~

    Now - as to the question of cost:

    Our school is not anywhere nearly as expensive as most. For members it was (when our son was in school - I'm sure it's gone up a bit now) just under $1500/per year (per child). But there are a lot of other costs. Registration fee. Book fees. Band fee. And then there are our candy sales, in which parents take kids out selling - using their $ for gas, etc. It can add up after a while to be kind of costly - especially if the mom doesn't work outside the home (which we all know is actually best, but not always possible...especially if a family is going to send their child(ren) to private school).

    Sometimes, though, it isn't the money that is the cost...
  25. Thanks
    Wilchbla reacted to robmac68 in Christian Schools - How Much?   
    In my town there was only one Christian School left and it closed down last year. It was a Catholic school and if you were in good standings with the church, active member, it was $3000.00 a year. If not an active Catholic, it was almost double that. I know I don't consider Catholic school to be really a "Christian" school, but if I had to choose between Catholic or public school, it would have been the Catholic school. We are currently homeschooling 2 kids with 2more soon to follow. If for some reason my wife and I can't continue this, we sill have to move or something. Public school will never be an option, although I don't consider it sin to send a kid to public school.

Article Categories

About Us

Since 2001, Online Baptist has been an Independent Baptist website, and we exclusively use the King James Version of the Bible. We pride ourselves on a community that uplifts the Lord.

Contact Us

You can contact us using the following link. Contact Us or for questions regarding this website please contact @pastormatt or email James Foley at jfoley@sisqtel.net

Android App

Online Baptist has a custom App for all android users. You can download it from the Google Play store or click the following icon.

×
×
  • Create New...