Jump to content
Online Baptist - Independent Baptist Community
Sign in to follow this  
  • entry
  • comments
  • views

Peter's Fall

Sign in to follow this  


And Simon Peter stood and warmed himself. They said therefore unto
him, Art not thou also one of His disciples? He denied it and said, I
am not.(John 18:25)
For our own sakes we should mark the steps which led to Peter’s fall. One was
l. His self-confidence
When forewarned, he resented the Mater’s foretelling, and declared
that though others might deny Christ he never would. When we grow
boastful we are in great peril. Safety lies in a consciousness of our
own weakness, and in implicit trust in God.
ll. The next step toward Peter’s fall was his sleeping in the garden
when he should have been watching and praying. That hour was given for
preparation for temptation but was not improved.
lll. Another step was his rashness in drawing his sword in the garden.
This act made him liable to arrest, and this fact made him nervous and
afraid of recognition. He tried to hide his connection with Jesus,
lest he should be arrested for his assault in the garden. Rash acts
are sure to make trouble for us afterward.
lV. Another step toward denial was Peter’s following Christ afar off.
This show timidity and failing faith. His courage was leaving him.
Following Christ was leaving him. Following Christ at a distance is
always perilous. It showed a weakening attachment and trembling
loyalty. It is in itself partial denial. The only worthy and the only
safe discipleship is thorough, unwavering devotion and wholehearted
V. This apostle took another step toward his fall when he sat down
among the servants of the high priest. He went among them to hide his
relation to Jesus. The only safe thing for a Christian is
unequivocally to declare his discipleship wherever he goes.
When Peter had taken these steps he could scarcely do otherwise than
openly deny his Lord. The time for us to guard ourselves is at the
beginnings of defection.

In His Matchless grace,
Bro. Thaung and family

Sign in to follow this  


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Posts

    • We had stir fry tonight. Probably salmon tomorrow.
    • Okay! I’m sorry, I think I was misinterpreting what you had said. I understand now, thank you! 
    • I would say that Pentecostalism gained widespread popularity in the 1950's with the growth of the Charismatic movement into the mainstream churches.  It is interesting that this more or less coincided with the Shakers deciding to disband and send their gifts into the world.
    • Regardless of when the first instance was, it's clear that the 20th century marked the RISE of the Pentecostal movement in terms of popularity and being widespread. Now it has practically infested everywhere there is any kind of Christian presence. the Pentecostal movement has gained a whole lot of popularity in 3rd would countries. 
    • Well Ezekiel 18 is emphasizing one particular aspect of the penalty of sin, being physical death, while Romans 6:23 is a more broader sense of death. I believe Pastor Scott Markle explained somewhere in this thread the difference aspects of death. You have to remember that Romans 6 and Ezekiel 18 are completely different contexts. Romans is talking about sin generally and salvation from sin. Ezekiel 18 is written to the nation of Israel who was under the Law of Moses and God warned them of physical death for disobedience in Deuteronomy 24 as I quoted earlier.