Jump to content
  • Welcome Guest

    For an ad free experience on Online Baptist, Please login or register for free

Recommended Posts

  • Administrators
Global Taxes and Global TV Now on the Agenda

By Cliff Kincaid



President Obama?s pick for Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner, is being urged to lay the foundation for ?global governance? by considering ?international taxation? measures to loot more money from U.S. taxpayers.



The recommendation is included in the report, ?The Global Agenda 2009,? which is being considered by the World Economic Forum (WEF), meeting in Davos, Switzerland, January 28 - February 1. The WEF is not an official government group but does include dozens of government, corporate and labor leaders at its annual meetings.



Media companies such as News Corporation (parent of Fox News, the Fox Business Network, and the Wall Street Journal), CNBC, and Forbes are official sponsors of the WEF meeting. News Corporation is listed as one of about 100 ?strategic partners? of the World Economic Forum.



?Look for live coverage on CNBC, all day every day,? reports CNBC ?Squawk Box? co-anchor Becky Quick. ?We kick things off at 6 a.m. Eastern time Wednesday on Squawk, with serious interviews from the headliners.? Her report, however, fails to disclose that CNBC is an ?industry partner? of the World Economic Forum this week.



CNBC is a subsidiary of General Electric, whose GE Capital is receiving a $139-billion taxpayer-financed loan guarantee as part of the Wall Street bailout. CNBC?s sister networks are NBC and MSNBC.



Other ?industry partners? of the WEF include Reuters, the British-based news agency. A Reuters story about the meeting that starts on Wednesday sounds like a press release from the organization, hailing its ?achievements? over time but failing to note that Reuters is a sponsor of this year?s event.



CNBC is advertising a ?No Way Back ? the Road to Recovery? debate hosted at the conference by CNBC?s Maria Bartiromo. One of the participants is Steve Schwarzman, Chairman, CEO and co-founder of the Chinese-funded and partly owned Blackstone Group.



Representing Chinese economic dominance in what Henry Kissinger has labeled a ?New World Order,? Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao is speaking to a special session of the conference on its first day.



The event?s corporate sponsors, which pay about half a million dollars each to participate, include several failing institutions that have received tens of billions of dollars from U.S. taxpayers. They include Bank of America, Citi, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase & Co., and Morgan Stanley. These entities are termed ?Strategic Partners? of the World Economic Forum.


The Global Agenda 2009? report says that ?sovereign states do not adequately address problems reaching across borders? and that ?international taxation? may be needed to generate the ?additional resources? for ?global governance.?



Could this become a source of new bailout money here and abroad?



?As current global governance problems come from market failures, sovereign failures and intergovernmental failures that cross boundaries, sacrificing sovereignty for greater gain may become an option,? the report says.



The report says the U.N.?s Law of the Sea Treaty, which is a top priority for Senate ratification under the Obama Administration, is a measure that has ?earned the acceptance and compliance? of most nations. The treaty would turn over oil, gas, and mineral resources to the U.N. and authorize access to them through payment of a global tax to a U.N. body.

:gross:
for the rest of the report: http://www.worldviewtimes.com/article.p ... ff-Kincaid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members


Yeah, today America is one of the biggest drivers towards a one world government. The only thing slowing down the pace is that most people, both here, in Europe and elsewhere don't actually support such a thing. This is why governments are constantly forcing this upon their people, going around the backs of voters, and even using deception to achieve their goals.

Were it not for voter opposition, the EU would entirely run Europe from a central government. Were it not for voter opposition in America, America would be a part of a regional or other governmental entitity by now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...