Jump to content
Online Baptist
  • Welcome Guest

    Tired of all the fighting that goes on in facebook groups? Are you ready for a community where you can talk about things of God and the Bible without getting branded a heretic? Well, we are glad you found us. Why don't you give us a try and see how friendly and different we are. - BroMatt

ELI3

Article on "Once Saved, Always Saved!"

Recommended Posts


When it comes down to it, either a person truly accepts Christ, which entails repentance that brings about change in ones life and leads to good works; or they never truly accepted Christ.

A head knowledge of Christ and accepting Christ intellectually isn't the same as acknowledging Christ in your heart in repentance and becoming a follower of Christ. The first is still in his sins while the other has been biblically born again.

One thing many professing Christians, pastors and churches fail to teach today is that Christ called for followers, disciples. The idea that one can have Jesus as Saviour while not accepting Him as Lord is a false teaching that's leading untold tens of thousands to hell.


I agree with what you say. But, Luke 8:11-13 cause me to also believe that one can accept the word and be saved sadly for only a short period. Edited by God's Child

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are always those who seem to accept Christ, and even think they have, yet who have not truly repented and accepted Christ according to the Word of God. These often seem to bloom greatly but then have a great "falling away". This "falling away" is really a matter of them returning to their nature because they never took on the new nature of Christ.

We see some of this in First John where we are told that some left them, these were ones they all thought were true Christians with them, yet they went away because they had never truly been of them to begin with.

This is whey Scripture admonishes all of us to examine our salvation, to check our faith, to be sure we are truly born again in Christ, so we don't risk being among those who think they are Christians but will one day hear Christ tell them they must depart because He never knew them.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There are always those who seem to accept Christ, and even think they have, yet who have not truly repented and accepted Christ according to the Word of God. These often seem to bloom greatly but then have a great "falling away". This "falling away" is really a matter of them returning to their nature because they never took on the new nature of Christ.

We see some of this in First John where we are told that some left them, these were ones they all thought were true Christians with them, yet they went away because they had never truly been of them to begin with.

This is whey Scripture admonishes all of us to examine our salvation, to check our faith, to be sure we are truly born again in Christ, so we don't risk being among those who think they are Christians but will one day hear Christ tell them they must depart because He never knew them.


I believe all that you state above. Curious, from what I share about conditional preservation of the saints would you question the gospel I follow as yet another gospel, or non-essential doctrine not valid toward the gospel that saves? Edited by God's Child

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



I guess we both agree then that a change of some magnitude must take place. Without change, I fear for that soul hanging on by a "prayer" .... it's never just a prayer alone, but the repentance that leads to the prayer. Without repentance I can't see genuine salvation. One must see the error in their ways and want to change.

I guess that is where I bunt heads with some of the eternal security folks. They look at the Bible and see an absolute moment of rebirth. A date. A time. I don't disagree that it's faith alone that saves, but the Bible shows many times where head knowledge won't get you far. It's a genuine moment of rebirth where one sees the need to trust Christ alone and nothing else. And at that moment the insides are changed and the child of God starts a journey along with the Holy Spirit. That child will never be separated from God. But, I see an earthly hand reaching our for a gift with a stipulation attached. God says to love him and keep his commandments and that faith without works is dead. If someone seeks God and starts the walk but then suddenly stops and has zero works and zero love for God I believe the Bible says they are still lost. Some say they had no saving faith, but it's not about a moment of salvation but about a beginning that must grow.

Some are strong in their faith and they grew from being a babe in Christ. Others just seem to stagnate. I fear for the unchanged "Christian" because I believe God reached out, He saved them, and then they rejected him in their infant state. They didn't build on a rock. They were seed on bad soil. I don't know how long God gives the babe in Christ, but if they don't start to grow I fear for them. I believe the speck of saving faith is small, just so one trust Christ alone and what he did on the Cross. But, how can one expect eternal life if they don't trust Christ anymore? Bible says they are dead, and dead means no life at all. Maybe they are weak, and still trust Christ, and maybe they are dead and don't want Christ. What about those moments of life? Was that nothing at all or maybe God turning the key and starting the journey. They didn't grow, they didn't care, they died, they gave God back his gift and said I don't really want it after all.

Am I the judge? No. But the Bible says faith without works is dead. That should fear people. Those hanging on by a prayer don't fear, they just accept they are helpless humans and that God made this magical way to heaven. They assume Christ is their advocate even as they reject him. They say he saved them on such and such a date. How foolish. They have no moment when they trusted him as their savior, they just have a date then when acquired head knowledge.

Not sure my stand is clear.


God'sChild,
On a Sunday morning, May 11, 1986 in the Berean Baptist Church, about 3 or 4 pews back, on the left side of the auditorium, Jesus came into my heart when I beleived and called on His name right after the preacher had preached a sermon entitled "The Lord is my Shepherd". This is what the Bible says happened......

John 5:24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.

So, 24 years ago I heard the Word and the moment I believed on Jesus I was a possessor of everlasting life, passed from death unto life, with a promise that I would never go to Hell. Please read this verse.......

2 Timothy 2:19 Nevertheless the foundation of God standeth sure, having this seal, The Lord knoweth them that are his.And, Let every one that nameth the name of Christ depart from iniquity.

Now read the next verse........

Matthew 7:23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.

Did you catch that? God says that He "Knoweth them that are His", but in the future when He puts those in the Lake of Fire He won't say "I used to know you"; No, He will say to all of them "I never knew you. Edited by heartstrings

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



This isn't true. Catholics believe in verial and mortal sins, and if you commit a mortal sin you lose your salvation unless you confess it to a priest (catholic) fast enough. They also believe that assurance of salvation - ie belief - is a sin, and also "believe" that babies if baptised are saved - but where is the belief in that? From the moment of water baptism, "belief" and faith has no meaning in a catholic setting. Believing has nothing to do with being saved. Being marked on the forehead by a priest is what has meaning in the catholic church. Paul says accursed is he that brings in any different gospel than the one he taught.
Edited by MaxKennedy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



If he was truly saved to begin with, yes he is still saved.
There's a BIG difference in a child of God, born from above, and a mere "professing Christian".
But real children of God, have and do sometimes live in unbelief. But it is God who is faithful.
The prodigal son, left his father, but he was still a son.

2 Timothy 2:13 If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.


the problem is that since we are saved by faith, you have asserted that a man with no faith is saved.
Also, you did not quote the whole verse, and totally misapplied the last clause! It says if we deny Him, He will deny us. Period. And Christ told the 12 that if they denied Him before men He would deny them before the Father-Matt.10. The Bible speaks of those who depart from the faith, those whose faith has been destroyed, those who shipwreck faith, and faith that only endures for awhile.

The story of the Prodigal Son was not given to teach OSAS, it was to get Jews to understand the mercy of God in Christ being kind and accepting ot the Samaritans. The point is that if a Samaritan repents, the Father will gladly receive him back. So should the elder brothers--the Jews. To insert OSAS here is to read the story out of context and twist it. Interestingly, in John 15:1-6, we are told to abide in HIm, and He in us, and every branch in HIm that does not abide will wither, die and ultimately be gathered for a burning. OSAS is not only unBiblical, but utterly dangerous to men's souls and a believer's sanctification and desires to be holy and live an overcoming life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Also, you did not quote the whole verse, and totally misapplied the last clause! It says if we deny Him, He will deny us. Period.

Here's the whole passage:

2 Timothy 2:11 It is a faithful saying: For if we be dead with him, we shall also live with him: 12 If we suffer, we shall also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us: 13 If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.

In verse 12 it does say "he will deny us", but what will he deny? The colon in the middle of verse 12 gives us the answer "reign with him". If we deny living for Christ and suffering ("if we suffer") for him in this life then he will deny our reign with him in the next, but it's not a denying of salvation. The Christian is already born again and in Christ, it's a done deal, he can't be unborn and fall out of Christ, "he cannot deny himself".

The Bible speaks of those who depart from the faith, those whose faith has been destroyed, those who shipwreck faith, and faith that only endures for awhile.

The only faith that saves is the "faith of Jesus Christ", it's not the faith in Jesus Christ, it's not our faith that saves us, it's His. The faith of Christ is a gift to us who believe in Him for salvation.

Galatians 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

Ephesians 2:8-9 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: 9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.

OSAS is a blessed truth of scripture! Edited by Soj

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Once Saved, Always Saved!

For instance, consider an apple tree: it doesn't bear apples to become an apple tree; neither does it bear apples to stay an apple tree. It bears apples because God made it an apple tree.



Interresting illustration. Why don't we consider for a moment another illustration. We will use your own statement changing on the word apple to fig and apples into figs.

"...it doesn't bear FIGS to become a FIG tree; neither does it bear FIGS to stay a FIG tree. It bears FIGS because GOd made it a FIG tree." What happened to the fig tree which did not produce figs (Mark 11:13ff)? Was it never really a fig tree because it did not bear figs? By your own statement it was still a fig tree though it did not bear fruit. What response did Christ have to the fig tree that bore no fruit? What does that teach us about this very subject? Hmmmmm.......

We might further discuss Luke 13:6ff to better understand this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Could someone who holds the view of "once saved always saved" explain something to me? I have heard those who believe in this doctrine claim that if a person "fell away" then he was "never saved in the first place." By this argument, how could one ever really know that he was indeed saved to start with since at some point he might turn to sin and then would in fact never have been saved in the first place.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to take the Bible for what it says. Eternal life, everlasting life, never leave me nor forsake me.

I use this illustration and it has become even more real to me because of my own son.

When we have a child born to us is there anything that can make that child no longer our child.

I have a son who has gone as far away from what he has been taught is right you can say he has done a 180 degree turn from the way he was brought up. He even got to the point he had to be told, "Do not return until you get right."

Is he no longer my son? If he denies me as his father is he no longer my son? If he changes his name, is he no longer my son? If he suffers from so unknown disease, has reaction to some drug, illicit or not, and his brain or reasoning somehow malfunctions, is he no longer my son?

What does that have to do with eternal security? Because that is what it is, eternal security. Once I have become a child of God, I am a child of God. No one, not me, you or anyone else can change that. My son will always be my son and I will be his dad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am going to take the Bible for what it says. Eternal life, everlasting life, never leave me nor forsake me.

I use this illustration and it has become even more real to me because of my own son.

When we have a child born to us is there anything that can make that child no longer our child.

I have a son who has gone as far away from what he has been taught is right you can say he has done a 180 degree turn from the way he was brought up. He even got to the point he had to be told, "Do not return until you get right."

Is he no longer my son? If he denies me as his father is he no longer my son? If he changes his name, is he no longer my son? If he suffers from so unknown disease, has reaction to some drug, illicit or not, and his brain or reasoning somehow malfunctions, is he no longer my son?

What does that have to do with eternal security? Because that is what it is, eternal security. Once I have become a child of God, I am a child of God. No one, not me, you or anyone else can change that. My son will always be my son and I will be his dad.


:amen:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Here's the whole passage:

2 Timothy 2:11 It is a faithful saying: For if we be dead with him, we shall also live with him: 12 If we suffer, we shall also reign with him: if we deny him, he also will deny us: 13 If we believe not, yet he abideth faithful: he cannot deny himself.

In verse 12 it does say "he will deny us", but what will he deny? The colon in the middle of verse 12 gives us the answer "reign with him". If we deny living for Christ and suffering ("if we suffer") for him in this life then he will deny our reign with him in the next, but it's not a denying of salvation. The Christian is already born again and in Christ, it's a done deal, he can't be unborn and fall out of Christ, "he cannot deny himself".


The only faith that saves is the "faith of Jesus Christ", it's not the faith in Jesus Christ, it's not our faith that saves us, it's His. The faith of Christ is a gift to us who believe in Him for salvation.

Galatians 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.

Ephesians 2:8-9 For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: 9 Not of works, lest any man should boast.

OSAS is a blessed truth of scripture!



Your interpretation of 2Tim 2 :12 is clearly incorrect. It lists different things. If we suffer with HIm--will will reign with Him in the Millenium. But if we DENY HIM rather than suffer, He will deny us. Christ already made it plain what He would do and what it meant. He would I say that He does not know us before the Father and the angels. This is about salvation, not about denying us a reign. That is simply a side-step some have come up with the blunt the force of all the verses that disprove OSAS. So they admit it teaches a form of loss, but it will be some millenial loss. That is clearly an Ad Hoc theory to save OSAS. It was never arrived at by a careful, inductive study of the Bible. OSAS apologists came up with this idea to save their unBiblical doctrine.

The last part is misused to deny the previous clause! It says if we become faithless--if we believers stop believing--believe not, He stays the same--faithful. Clearly it is possible, under the pressure of suffering, to not only deny the Lord, but to cease to believe. Even though we would deny Him, He doesn't change, for He cannot deny Himself. Therefore, if we are to be like Him, we must not deny Him either.

That verse absolutely refutes OSAS. The spin offered by OSAS apologists is obvious.

Next we are offered a theory that its not our faith that saved us, but Christs. Its given to us, and since its His, it can't fail. Well 2Tim 2:12 denies this. We all know of real believers who bore fruit, that later fell away, and some deny the reality of Christianity now.

Also, this idea shows a lack of understandingof this language. Christ told the woman "Daughter, YOUR FAITH has saved you"-Luke 7:50. In Eph 1:13 Paul we says we first trusted in Christ after we heard the gospel. This idea that its Christ's faith and not ours is nonsense. Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God. The reason its the faith "of" Christ is because the message is about Christ. That message stirs faith in us. There is no support for OSAS with arguments like these. They are clearly artificial and contrived

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Your interpretation of 2Tim 2 :12 is clearly incorrect. It lists different things. If we suffer with HIm--will will reign with Him in the Millenium. But if we DENY HIM rather than suffer, He will deny us. Christ already made it plain what He would do and what it meant. He would I say that He does not know us before the Father and the angels. This is about salvation, not about denying us a reign. That is simply a side-step some have come up with the blunt the force of all the verses that disprove OSAS. So they admit it teaches a form of loss, but it will be some millenial loss. That is clearly an Ad Hoc theory to save OSAS. It was never arrived at by a careful, inductive study of the Bible. OSAS apologists came up with this idea to save their unBiblical doctrine.

The last part is misused to deny the previous clause! It says if we become faithless--if we believers stop believing--believe not, He stays the same--faithful. Clearly it is possible, under the pressure of suffering, to not only deny the Lord, but to cease to believe. Even though we would deny Him, He doesn't change, for He cannot deny Himself. Therefore, if we are to be like Him, we must not deny Him either.

That verse absolutely refutes OSAS. The spin offered by OSAS apologists is obvious.

Next we are offered a theory that its not our faith that saved us, but Christs. Its given to us, and since its His, it can't fail. Well 2Tim 2:12 denies this. We all know of real believers who bore fruit, that later fell away, and some deny the reality of Christianity now.

Also, this idea shows a lack of understandingof this language. Christ told the woman "Daughter, YOUR FAITH has saved you"-Luke 7:50. In Eph 1:13 Paul we says we first trusted in Christ after we heard the gospel. This idea that its Christ's faith and not ours is nonsense. Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the Word of God. The reason its the faith "of" Christ is because the message is about Christ. That message stirs faith in us. There is no support for OSAS with arguments like these. They are clearly artificial and contrived

You said: "Incorrect, side-step, theory, unbiblical, misused, spin, lack of understanding, nonsense, artificial and contrived."

Faith1611, judging by the fruit of your reply, you can't surely expect me to believe you are speaking by the Spirit of God and representing the truth of God? If the belief you hold to on this subject leads you to communicating in this manner to your 'Christian brethren' then I want nothing to do with it.

James 1:26 If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion is vain.

To me you are nothing but a wolf in sheep's clothing, but your sheep's disguise is weak, I can see the wolf a mile away. I hope the administrators of this forum can too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


You said: "Incorrect, side-step, theory, unbiblical, misused, spin, lack of understanding, nonsense, artificial and contrived."

Faith1611, judging by the fruit of your reply, you can't surely expect me to believe you are speaking by the Spirit of God and representing the truth of God? If the belief you hold to on this subject leads you to communicating in this manner to your 'Christian brethren' then I want nothing to do with it.

James 1:26 If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion is vain.

To me you are nothing but a wolf in sheep's clothing, but your sheep's disguise is weak, I can see the wolf a mile away. I hope the administrators of this forum can too.


Amen Soj, anotherone who wants to ask a question and then proceed to "straighten" people out. Edited by Bro Jim

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


You said: "Incorrect, side-step, theory, unbiblical, misused, spin, lack of understanding, nonsense, artificial and contrived."

Faith1611, judging by the fruit of your reply, you can't surely expect me to believe you are speaking by the Spirit of God and representing the truth of God? If the belief you hold to on this subject leads you to communicating in this manner to your 'Christian brethren' then I want nothing to do with it.

James 1:26 If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion is vain.

To me you are nothing but a wolf in sheep's clothing, but your sheep's disguise is weak, I can see the wolf a mile away. I hope the administrators of this forum can too.


false doctrine, wrong, non -Scriptural doctrines, damnable heresy, heretic are all words that have been used against me on this site; I haven't heard any complaints about that.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



false doctrine, wrong, non -Scriptural doctrines, damnable heresy, heretic are all words that have been used against me on this site; I haven't heard any complaints about that.....



Well, that is called hypocrisy. The response to my post, which offered Scriptural exegesis and argument, was met with a personal attack claiming I am not saved, but a wolf! And this same individual complained about how I spoke and the words I used, and then called me a wolf. That sure is easier than admitting they can't answer my points and they are guilty of twisting Scripture. Edited by Faith1611

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


You said: "Incorrect, side-step, theory, unbiblical, misused, spin, lack of understanding, nonsense, artificial and contrived."

Faith1611, judging by the fruit of your reply, you can't surely expect me to believe you are speaking by the Spirit of God and representing the truth of God? If the belief you hold to on this subject leads you to communicating in this manner to your 'Christian brethren' then I want nothing to do with it.

James 1:26 If any man among you seem to be religious, and bridleth not his tongue, but deceiveth his own heart, this man's religion is vain.

To me you are nothing but a wolf in sheep's clothing, but your sheep's disguise is weak, I can see the wolf a mile away. I hope the administrators of this forum can too.



So you call me a wolf after complaining about the words I used? You take it to this level, and claim I am hell-bound? This is hypocrisy. You claim I am not speaking by the Spirit of God? You surely are not because I am a born again believer who loves Jesus Christ and has been saved by Him. I am an elder in my church. The Spirit of God is the Spirit of truth, and what I wrote is true, therefore it is of the Spirit of God, Your response was not only a lie, but evasive as well. My post offered exegesis and argument. You avoided that, and instead seek to paint me as a deceiver so others won't listen. Such tactics are surely diabolical. Edited by Faith1611

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So you call me a wolf after complaining about the words I used? You take it to this level, and claim I am hell-bound? This is hypocrisy. You claim I am not speaking by the Spirit of God? You surely are not because I am a born again believer who loves Jesus Christ and has been saved by Him. I am an elder in my church. The Spirit of God is the Spirit of truth, and what I wrote is true, therefore it is of the Spirit of God, Your response was not only a lie, but evasive as well. My post offered exegesis and argument. You avoided that, and instead seek to paint me as a deceiver so others won't listen. Such tactics are surely diabolical.


Faith1611, the way I see it from here, you joined this forum 2 days ago and never made the effort to introduce yourself. You immediately dived into the Salvation Forum and began claiming that Christians can lose their salvation, 5 out of the mere 6 posts you've typed have argued against the belief that many of us hold dear, the eternal security of the believer. Several of your posts have been very confrontational and you have made some harsh accusations.

Jesus said "by their fruits ye shall know them", and I'm inspecting your fruit and it looks rotten to me.

Why are you here? Did you come for fellowship, to be edified, or just to debate? If your intentions for being here are honourable then why didn't you introduce yourself to the other members when you joined, and why is their no information about you in your profile?

So this is where I'm coming from when I say you're a wolf. Please prove me wrong with a Christ-like reply and I'll gladly apologize?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



Faith1611, the way I see it from here, you joined this forum 2 days ago and never made the effort to introduce yourself. You immediately dived into the Salvation Forum and began claiming that Christians can lose their salvation, 5 out of the mere 6 posts you've typed have argued against the belief that many of us hold dear, the eternal security of the believer. Several of your posts have been very confrontational and you have made some harsh accusations.

Jesus said "by their fruits ye shall know them", and I'm inspecting your fruit and it looks rotten to me.

Why are you here? Did you come for fellowship, to be edified, or just to debate? If your intentions for being here are honourable then why didn't you introduce yourself to the other members when you joined, and why is their no information about you in your profile?

So this is where I'm coming from when I say you're a wolf. Please prove me wrong with a Christ-like reply and I'll gladly apologize?


:amen: Plus the fact Scripture teaches that if we are saved, we are eternally saved. Upon salvation we are born again into the family of God and receive at that moment everlasting life.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites



:amen: Plus the fact Scripture teaches that if we are saved, we are eternally saved. Upon salvation we are born again into the family of God and receive at that moment everlasting life.


Titus 1:2 says, " In hope of eternal life, which God, that cannot lie, promised before the world began;" Titus 3:7 says, "That being justified by his grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life" Rom 8:24-25 says, "For we are saved by hope: but hope that is seen is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for? [25] But if we hope for that we see not, then do we with patience wait for it."

We can also look at other passages such as 1 John 2:24-25 which reads "......If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you, ye also shall continue in the Son, and in the Father. 25: And this is the promise that he hath promised us, even eternal life." This is an If then statement....If x is true then y is true....what if x is not true then y is not true. If it remains in us then we remain in Christ; what if it does not remain in us? We can also look at 2 Peter 1:5-10 which again shows that we do not fall if we add these Christian graces to our lives. We can study the book of Hebrews which clearly speaks of the possibility of falling. Gal 5:4 clearly states we can fall from grace which we are saved by grace (Eph 2:8-10).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

2 Corinthians 5:21 For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.


Yes, Jim, that is exactly what the passage says but that does not in any sense prove OSAS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

John 10:28-29 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

John 10:28-29 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand. My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand.


Absolutely, Jim. That passage teaches that no one can take my salvation from me but what it does not teach is that I am not able to turn away from the Lord.

Simon, in Acts 8:10ff, obeyed the Gospel and was saved and yet after being saved was told by Peter that he perished with his money; he was told to pray to the Lord that he might be forgiven. Would it not have been a sin for Peter to tell him that he perished if he was perfectly safe?

1 John 1:9 teaches us that the Lord will forgive us of our sins if we are willing to confess. What if we aren't? Will the Lord forgive us regardless? Will we be saved anyway? Jesus certainly stated that if we aren't willing to repent that we will perish (Luke 13:3, 5)

Jim, the Word of God is a wonderful comfort. Knowing that I am given the ability to be saved is a blessing and comfort. It is a comfort to know that His blood continues to to cleans me from all sin if I will simply walk in the Light (notice it does not say that I must live perfectly) (1 John 1:7). What is not a comfort is believing in something which is simply not in the Word of God. I don't need to believe in such in order to be comforted.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 22 Guests (See full list)

    There are no registered users currently online



×