Jump to content
Online Baptist

What does 'Israel' mean in the Old Testament and in the New?

Recommended Posts

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

You quite obviously did not read my posts properly or you would not misrepresent my posts the way you do.

In any case, it is time to move on from this argument as you obviously cannot read either my responses nor the Bible correctly.

I refer you to another passage:

Rev 7

4 And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel.

God here refers to the tribes of the children of Israel, and to his use of them in the end times.

Why is it that God STILL refers to Israel in the end times?


And you still refuse to do this board the basic good manners of properly introducing yourself, which is the standard modus operandi of false teachers who come here.

Edited by DaveW
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
21 minutes ago, Shoostie said:

The tribes in Revelation 7 no longer exist in a literal sense.  Revelation's reference to them is symbolic.

You just hop from one place to another, as you lose points in one place after another.   Given not all Israel is Israel, how can that be?  Why don't you answer questions against the core of your doctrines?


Excellent - so then which tribe are you a "spiritual part" of?

Rev 7

4  And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel.

 5  Of the tribe of Juda were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Reuben were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Gad were sealed twelve thousand.

 6  Of the tribe of Aser were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Nepthalim were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Manasses were sealed twelve thousand.

 7  Of the tribe of Simeon were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Levi were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Issachar were sealed twelve thousand.

 8  Of the tribe of Zabulon were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Joseph were sealed twelve thousand. Of the tribe of Benjamin were sealed twelve thousand.

You deliberate misrepresented my points from the previous passage, and refused to answer the actual point, so there was no further point in continuing there. Everyone else could see my point, as evidenced by the likes of my posts. Why you could not is simply because you refuse to.

So it was time to move to another passage where God refers to national Israel AFTER you say they no longer exist.

So then...... how do you explain that God refers to "the tribes of the children of Israel" and then refers to each tribe BY NAME  after the time that you say Israel no longer exists?

And in your answer you probably need to show an instance of where the specific phrase "the children of Israel" is used to refer some group OTHER than physical Israel. It might be there, but I haven't found it yet.


Why is it that God STILL refers to Israel in the end times?


And you still refuse to do this board the basic good manners of properly introducing yourself, which is the standard modus operandi of false teachers who come here.

Edited by DaveW
Paste from previous added extra
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
1 hour ago, Shoostie said:

Why don't you answer questions against the core of your doctrines?

Ummmmm - I just went back and I can only find 1 question and it was a stupid question which you answered yoursel, so I didn't need to.

Can you give ANY EVIDENCE from the passage that it is symbolic?

It isn't symbolic just because you say it is - there must be a reason for it to be considered symbolic.

And why would God go to all the trouble of naming and designating the VERY TRIBES if they didn't exist in the time that God is referring to.

As far as Only 144000 jews left..... Have you actually read the passage?

Nowhere does it indicate that these are the ONLY israelites left..... go back and read the actual passage and report back.

Let's just ask the question - if God wanted to indicate that these 144000 young men from the individual tribes of the nation of Israel, how would he have to write it to convince you?

He uses the term "the children of Israel" which I contend ALWAYS refers to the Nation of Israel; He refers to each of the twelve tribes BY NAME, distinctly indicating each of the twelve individual tribes.


It appears as though your only evidence for it being a "highly symbolic" passage is that you want it to be, and if it is not it proves you are 100% wrong that God is finished with the nation of Israel.

Your proposition that "I'm right and you're wrong" is not evidence of any kind.

Oh yeah - do you really think that God can't preserve the tribes if He so wishes? 


I could not follow such a limited god. I prefer the God of the bible to your weak version.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
18 minutes ago, Shoostie said:

Your evidence is a highly symbolic passage of 12Kx12 Isrealites.  The tribes don't exist today.  These tribes not only don't exist today, they can't exist today because a tribe can't be preserved by people who don't know their tribe.  Your evidence is a highly symbolic passage that defies being taken literally.   You can't make them exist by insisting Revelation 7 refers to 12 distinct tribes existing today.  You can't be right about Revelation is your doctrine requires something to exist that doesn't exist.

Why 144,000?  Do you think in the end times, there will only be 144,000 "Jews" left?  Do you think they can really be servants of God today if they've rejected Christ?  And, if they've accepted Christ, who are you to say they're not spiritual Israel that includes Christians? 








Sorry, I just can't believe that this is your so called reason for this passage being symbolic.......

For starters although you say the tribes don't exist today, you are wrong. Many Israelites today know their tribe, whether you believe it or not.

I have spoken to some of them, and they are certain they know.

Secondly, even if "the tribes don't exist today" ( which is incorrect) why would you think God wouldn't know which tribe was which?  And that if He wanted to He couldn't resurrect the tribes for this purpose? What sort of god do you follow?????

This is your "proof"?

That the tribes no longer exist so the passage must be symbolic?

But if the passage is not symbolic then the tribes must exist....... your reasoning is circular.

You are trying to prove that the tribes don't exist because the passage is symbolic, and the passage is symbolic because the tribes don't exist......

I have already shown that God refers to national Israel after the time that you say they ceased to exist (whether you accept that or not).

And this passage, stating by name the tribes that are part of "the children of Israel", also proves that national Israel exists after the time that you say they ceased to exist.

And by the way I can keep this up. There are plenty more passages that refer to national Israel from Acts onwards.....



And you still refuse to do this board the basic good manners of properly introducing yourself, which is the standard modus operandi of false teachers who come here.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
9 minutes ago, Shoostie said:

The tribes don't exist today.  You've never spoke to anyone who knew what tribe they're of.  You've spoken to kooks who have decided on their own that they belong to a certain tribe.  Maybe you should have asked "How do you know?"  Did they marry someone of the same tribe?

They don't exist for God to know one from another.  As explained to you, a tribe can't be preserved by people who don't know what tribe they're from.  Most of the tribes have been lost for over 100 generations.  They are loooooooong gone, and are completely mixed with practically every person on Earth.

How would God resurrect a tribe?  Have 2000-year-old bones jump out of the ground?  If God's going to do that, then I can say they're from before Christ.

Don't expect me to change my doctrine because you insist something exists that doesn't exist.

















So you are legitimately going to base your whole argument on "I'm right and you're wrong"?

You are unbelievable.....

All I can say to you is that your assessment of the people I have spoken to is totally wrong and based on absolutely zero evidence. It is based only on your wanting to be so.

You are so deceived.....

And your god is not the God of the Bible, for my God can do what He promises.

When He notes the 144000 as " the children of Israel", and designates them by naming each and every tribe, I MUST believe that He has preserved the tribes, and I KNOW He is able to do whatsoever He promises.

Your whole argument is based only on your wanting it to be so, but it just isn't. 

I have presented verses, passages, and Biblical evidence, and reported first hand information to back up my position.

You have done nothing more than say I am wrong.

I genuinely feel sorry for you - the god you follow is weak and small, and not the Almighty,  all-knowing, all-powerful God of the Bible.



And you still refuse to do this board the basic good manners of properly introducing yourself, which is the standard modus operandi of false teachers who come here.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
48 minutes ago, Shoostie said:

KJVO only people measure the accuracy of other Bibles by comparing it to the KJV.  They'd compare the original manuscripts to the KJV and declare the original manuscripts full of errors.  That's what you do, you measure the world by your doctrines, and then deny the world is wrong when it doesn't match your doctrines.

Your doctrine says the 12 tribes still exist, and you're not going to let the reality that they don't exist get in your way.  And, because you believe they exist, you think their existence proves my doctrine is wrong.


On both counts you are wrong.

Many KJV people have done considerable study into both translation matters and manuscript matters. Comparing modern versions to the KJV can be useful, but it is not the whole matter.

Secondly, I have first hand experience of conversations and been shown evidence in Israel of those who can follow the tribal history. This is legitimate, provable, evidence based fact, not your personal denial of such. (What is it with you and the whole "I'm right and you're wrong" stuff - you don't present any evidence, and have not done so as far as I can see in ANY of your posts.)

As far as biblical evidence of national Israel's existence being acknowledge by God, I am glad you asked.

It is not "my doctrine" that says national Israel still exists, it is God's.

I would like you to respond to EVERY verse and passage listed here, with the exception of those which are clearly historical record (as marked).

Here is every use of the word “Israel” that occurs in the Bible after the Resurrection of Jesus (Excluding the Gospels).


There are 46 verses. In each of these 46 verses the name of Israel is used by the writer UNDER THE MOVING of the HOLY GHOST. Not one of these uses is an incorrect usage of the name “Israel” (Because the Bible is perfect.)

Act_1:6  When they therefore were come together, they asked of him, saying, Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel?

The Disciples were not rebuked by Jesus for referring to national Israel.

Act_2:22  Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs, which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:

Act_2:36  Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God hath made that same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord and Christ.

The men then standing before Peter were not saved men, but were Israelites. Many of them were saved AFTER Peter finished his preaching.


Act_3:12  And when Peter saw it, he answered unto the people, Ye men of Israel, why marvel ye at this? or why look ye so earnestly on us, as though by our own power or holiness we had made this man to walk?

Again, the men being spoken to in this passage were not saved at that time, but were Israelites.

Act_4:8  Then Peter, filled with the Holy Ghost, said unto them, Ye rulers of the people, and elders of Israel,

Act_4:10  Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God raised from the dead, even by him doth this man stand here before you whole.

Chapter 4 was preaching before the Hebrew council, the overwhelming majority of whom were unsaved at that time. Peter twice calls them Israel, under the inspiration of the Holy Ghost.

Act_4:27  For of a truth against thy holy child Jesus, whom thou hast anointed, both Herod, and Pontius Pilate, with the Gentiles, and the people of Israel, were gathered together,

They were praying to the Lord when they referred to national Israel specifically in this passage.

Act_5:21  And when they heard that, they entered into the temple early in the morning, and taught. But the high priest came, and they that were with him, and called the council together, and all the senate of the children of Israel, and sent to the prison to have them brought.

This is not referring to some kind of “Senate of saved people” but to the (Largely unsaved) senate of “the children of Israel” (There is that term....)

Act_5:31  Him hath God exalted with his right hand to be a Prince and a Saviour, for to give repentance to Israel, and forgiveness of sins.

This one is a reference to the purpose of Jesus, and therefore being mentioned after the death and resurrection of Jesus is not relevant to this discussion.

Act_5:35  And said unto them, Ye men of Israel, take heed to yourselves what ye intend to do as touching these men.

This was a man of the council referring to “the men of Israel”, and not an Apostle, so it is not directly relevant.

Act_7:23  And when he was full forty years old, it came into his heart to visit his brethren the children of Israel.

Act_7:37  This is that Moses, which said unto the children of Israel, A prophet shall the Lord your God raise up unto you of your brethren, like unto me; him shall ye hear.

Act_7:42  Then God turned, and gave them up to worship the host of heaven; as it is written in the book of the prophets, O ye house of Israel, have ye offered to me slain beasts and sacrifices by the space of forty years in the wilderness?

The previous 3 verses are all record of the history of Israel and therefore not relevant to this discussion.

Act_9:15  But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel:

This is GOD HIMSELF, speaking of the commission of Saul (Paul) to testify of God before the Gentiles and “the children of Israel” (There is that term again...) This is ABSOLUTELY speaking about unsaved people, and in this case it is the direct recording of the WORDS OF GOD HIMSELF.

Act_10:36  The word which God sent unto the children of Israel, preaching peace by Jesus Christ: (he is Lord of all:)

It could be argued that this reference is historic, but it is referring to national Israel when it uses that term (there is that term again...)

Act_13:16  Then Paul stood up, and beckoning with his hand said, Men of Israel, and ye that fear God, give audience.

Act_13:17  The God of this people of Israel chose our fathers, and exalted the people when they dwelt as strangers in the land of Egypt, and with an high arm brought he them out of it.

Act_13:23  Of this man's seed hath God according to his promise raised unto Israel a Saviour, Jesus:

Act_13:24  When John had first preached before his coming the baptism of repentance to all the people of Israel.

This is Peter preaching to a gathering of people, and vs 16 is interesting to this discussion for it mentions “Men of Israel”... “and ye that fear God”, making a distinction between the two groups that were there present.


Act_21:28  Crying out, Men of Israel, help: This is the man, that teacheth all men every where against the people, and the law, and this place: and further brought Greeks also into the temple, and hath polluted this holy place.

This was a false charge against Paul, and therefore made by an unsaved man. As a result it cannot be used in this discussion.

Act_28:20  For this cause therefore have I called for you, to see you, and to speak with you: because that for the hope of Israel I am bound with this chain.

The Hope of Israel is Jesus Christ, and therefore this verse is not relevant to this discussion.

Rom_9:4  Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises;

Rom_9:6  Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:

These two verses have already been discussed, but the intervening verses are all directly relating to national Israel.

Rom_9:27  Esaias also crieth concerning Israel, Though the number of the children of Israel be as the sand of the sea, a remnant shall be saved:

Historical reference.

Rom_9:31  But Israel, which followed after the law of righteousness, hath not attained to the law of righteousness.

The use of the word “Hath” which is a present tense word brings the reference into the time of the statement, therefore showing that “Israel” had not at that time attained righteousness (salvation), but that Israel was AT THAT TIME A VALID REFERENCE to the nation.

Rom_10:1  Brethren, my heart's desire and prayer to God for Israel is, that they might be saved.

Clearly, if Israel was “spiritual Israel” ONLY, then this verse makes no sense. National Israel is being referenced here.

Rom_10:19  But I say, Did not Israel know? First Moses saith, I will provoke you to jealousy by them that are no people, and by a foolish nation I will anger you.

Historical reference.

Rom_10:21  But to Israel he saith, All day long I have stretched forth my hands unto a disobedient and gainsaying people.

Historical reference but obviously relevant to that day also.

Rom_11:1  I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.

Rom_11:2  God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew. Wot ye not what the scripture saith of Elias? how he maketh intercession to God against Israel, saying,

In verse 1 Paul not only calls himself an Israelite, but then defines what he means by that, when he gives the lineage of his Physical birth. He is stating that physically he is an Israelite.

Then is vs 2 he states that He hath not cast his people away - the physical lineage is what he is talking about not spiritual...


Rom_11:7  What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded

If this is spiritual Israel, then it is saying that not all saved people are saved. Sounds like something Calvin would say......

Rom_11:25  For I would not, brethren, that ye should be ignorant of this mystery, lest ye should be wise in your own conceits; that blindness in part is happened to Israel, until the fulness of the Gentiles be come in.

Blindness in part is happened to Israel..... does this mean that some saved people are blinded? and it mentions a timeline here - until the fullness of the Gentiles be come in. Part of Israel will be blind until that time....... but after that time we have the next verse.

Rom_11:26  And so all Israel shall be saved: as it is written, There shall come out of Sion the Deliverer, and shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob:

So all Israel shall be saved when the fullness of the gentiles be come in. That is not yet.... so part of Israel (as distinct from the Gentiles by the way) is currently in blindness.

1Co_10:18  Behold Israel after the flesh: are not they which eat of the sacrifices partakers of the altar?

“Israel after the flesh” “Eat of the sacrifices of the altar”...... Has to be National Israel, no other explanation makes sense.

2Co_3:7  But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, so that the children of Israel could not stedfastly behold the face of Moses for the glory of his countenance; which glory was to be done away:

Historical reference, but there is that term again.....

2Co_3:13  And not as Moses, which put a vail over his face, that the children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is abolished:

Historical reference, but there is that term again.....


2Co_11:22  Are they Hebrews? so am I. Are they Israelites? so am I. Are they the seed of Abraham? so am I.

All terms which speak about national Israel, and used in such a way as to emphasise that aspect.

Gal_6:16  And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God.

This verse makes a distinction between the saved and “the Israel of God”, apparently asking God to give them peace and mercy.

Eph_2:12  That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:

Neither saved, nor citizens of the nation of Israel, and not associated with the covenants of promise (which were given to national Israel), and having no hope, and without God.

The rest of the passage makes the point that it makes no difference what nation you come from, everyone has sinned and everyone needs to be saved.

Php_3:5  Circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, an Hebrew of the Hebrews; as touching the law, a Pharisee;

Of the stock of Israel - obviously a reference to national Israel.

Heb_8:8  For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:

House of Israel and the house of Judah - obviously national Israel (and national Judah).

Heb_8:10  For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:

Context has not changed - national Israel.

Heb_11:22  By faith Joseph, when he died, made mention of the departing of the children of Israel; and gave commandment concerning his bones.

Historical reference.

Rev_2:14  But I have a few things against thee, because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication.

Historical reference.

Rev_7:4  And I heard the number of them which were sealed: and there were sealed an hundred and forty and four thousand of all the tribes of the children of Israel.

Tribes mentioned - why would God mention the individual tribes if he was speaking “symbolically”? They have no spiritual reference.

Rev_21:12  And had a wall great and high, and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names written thereon, which are the names of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel:

Why would God write the names of the twelve tribes on the gates of His Holy City if He did not consider them His people?


There are some of these that are not relevant either because they are simply an historical record, or in two cases it is an ungodly man making the reference. These men could be misusing the reference, and so it is not reasonable to use them as evidence.

HOWEVER, every reference to national Israel that occurs after the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ proves that God still considers the nation of Israel to be a legitimate nation.

If He did not, He would not record the nation as a nation in His Word.

Along with this, there is the statement of Romans 11:

Rom 11:1-2 KJV

(1)  I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.

(2)  God hath not cast away his people which he foreknew. Wot ye not what the scripture saith of Elias? how he maketh intercession to God against Israel, saying,


Paul directly addresses this question, and no matter a person may do with the rest of the passage, Paul asks and then answers the question - emphatically God has not cast away His people which he foreknew, the physical nation which Paul references in vs 1.


The point here with all of these verses, is that God constantly and repeatedly throughout the New Testament and after the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ (which is when you say that Israel ceased to be a nation) refers to the nation of Israel in terms that indicate it is still a legitimate nation. Now, personally, I think God knows what He is talking about, and if He is happy to constantly and repeatedly refer to the nation of Israel, I am happy to accept that God recognises them as a legitimate nation.

Further to this, if God uses references to the tribes, or individual tribes, on several occasions in the New Testament, then I am happy to accept that God knows who makes up those tribes that He states clearly that He is going to use TWICE in the book of Revelation. The God of the Bible is able to do that.

Your god apparently cannot.

And you still refuse to do this board the basic good manners of properly introducing yourself, which is the standard modus operandi of false teachers who come here.


Edited by DaveW
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

Oh yeah, and you haven't designated the "Spiritual tribe" you are part of.....

You really do have to explain what the purpose is of naming each if the twelve individual tribes. If it is symbolic (and it isn't) then what do each of the tribes symbolise?

Because if they are symbolic it makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE to include that section.

Explain away the tribes in Rev 7.



And you still refuse to do this board the basic good manners of properly introducing yourself, which is the standard modus operandi of false teachers who come here.


Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
6 hours ago, Shoostie said:

We live in the age of the Internet.   Your "experience and conversations" aren't good enough.  Post links that document this tribal history.

Acts 1:6 is the only New Testament passage that comes close to saying anything about restoring Israel. But, it's was a question of when Jesus was going to free the existing Jewish state from Roman occupation.  And, Jesus essentially answered it with Pentecost, a spiritual restoration of Israel, which occurred when the disciples returned to Jerusalem.  In essence, Jesus said the church was Israel.

Acts 1:6b Lord, wilt thou at this time restore again the kingdom to Israel [not "restore Israel"]? 7 And he said unto them, It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power.  8 But ye shall receive power, after that the Holy Ghost [Pentacost]....

I can't reply to all of your verse references, but they all agree with me.



You post evidence backing up your claim.

I have been to Israel, spoken to Israelies who know their heritage, been to places that list their heritage. Not internet waffle but genuine experience.

And you won't answer any of the verses because you can't. 

God, in His perfect Word, constantly and repeatedly refers to national Israel after you say He has forsaken then.

You are wrong, and your " I'm right and you're wrong" attitude will not change that.


And you still have not done this board the basic courtesy of properly introducing yourself in the intro section..

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
3 hours ago, Shoostie said:

Backing up my claim that the tribes of Israel no longer exists. Would you like evidenced that there's not a Tyrannosaurus family living in your back yard?  It's your burden to prove that that the tribes still exist.  I knew you wouldn't provide any links because there are no links supporting your bad doctrine-based delusion that the tribes still exist.   Genuine experience?  More like genuine poppycock.  If there are places that list their heritage, it would be on the internet. 

I quoted 46 verses of evidence to back up my personal experience. 

Why would I need more?

Surely MY personal experience is AT LEAST as relevant as you unsupported opinion....

And you still haven't shown any evidence that Rev 7 is symbolic in that section, nor of which "spiritual tribe" you are a part, AND you haven't actually answered EVEN ONE verse of those I posted, the majority of which state clearly that God still considers Israel to be a legitimate nation.

I would rather follow God's opinion than yours...



And OF COURSE you still have not done this board the basic courtesy of properly introducing yourself in the intro section, which is a glaring commonality with the false teachers who come to this forum to cause trouble.

Edited by DaveW
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

Not that I care much because I have seen the monuments and walls with such info, but the very first link I came across was this:

To this day there are Jews who trace their descent from the ancient tribe of priests (kohanim) and levites (leviim) of the Jewish Bible and who still receive special recognition in areas such as the Jewish synagogue service.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki › J...
Jewish genealogy - Wikipedia

So at least one tribe still knows, but I was led around Israel by a guy who has traced his lineage to Benjamin, and many - not all, but many Israelies can and do know their tribal heritage.

So then, personal experience, web site support, and that little matter of 46 verses showing that God doesn't agree with you.

This again is pointless, because you refuse to address the EVIDENCE placed before, but somehow think that to counter with "I'm right and you're wrong" is good enough.....

Time to move on to YET ANOTHER section that goes against your false teaching.


And OF COURSE you still have not done this board the basic courtesy of properly introducing yourself in the intro section, which is a glaring commonality with the false teachers who come to this forum to cause trouble.

Edited by DaveW
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

Next matter then.......

(And note that I am not changing because I cannot answer you, I am changing because YOU WILL NOT answer the previous points.)

Genesis 17

 7  And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee.

 8  And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God. note

 9  And God said unto Abraham, Thou shalt keep my covenant therefore, thou, and thy seed after thee in their generations.

 10  This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised.

 11  And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.

 12  And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every man child in your generations, he that is born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which is not of thy seed. note

 13  He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant.

 14  And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant.


God made an EVERLASTING COVENANT that the lan would be an EVERLASTING POSESSION.

I hope the everlasting life that God promises is not like your idea of an everlasting covenant - one that can be broken and is therefore not actually everlasting.

I hope everlasting life is JUST LIKE God's everlasting promises - IT LASTS FOREVER.....

So then - if it was given as an everlasting covenant then the people MUST still exist or it has failed and WAS NEVER everlasting in the first place.

Explain how it is that your position makes God  liar, but you still think you are right and....... God is wrong?!?!?!?!


And OF COURSE you still have not done this board the basic courtesy of properly introducing yourself in the intro section, which is a glaring commonality with the false teachers who come to this forum to cause trouble.

Edited by DaveW
Link to post
Share on other sites

   God certainly isn't through with LITERAL Israel. All the tribes still DO exist, although none outside the Jews know they're Israelis at all. But GOD knows! HE will reveal to them who they are when His time comes.


  In Ezekiel, Israel & Judah are called Aholah(Samaria) & Aholibah(Jerusalem). And Aholibah was to receive the greater punishment because she saw Aholah punished with exile by the Assyrians, but went on to exceed Aholah in sin. And the history of the Jews proves they are indeed the actual physical Jews. No other distinct people have borne the hatred & persecution for centuries, as the Jews have, but yet remained a distinct people & kept their national identity. Only GOD could accomplish that!


  But God will keep the promises He made to Abraham, Isaac, & Jacob concerning their posterity. (And to David as well.)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

And yet it DOES SAY that they can follow back to them - This disproved your assertion. And it was only the first that was listed on my search.

You are the one making the false claim, so you need to prove it, not me.

I have shown verse after verse after verse after verse that proves you are wrong.

THAT is reliable testimony.

I have seen the lists on the walls and seen the monuments standing, and spoken with people who follow their lineage to Benjamin specifically, and I don't remember the others.

But even that is nothing compared to the verse after verse that shows you are wrong.

In response to the verses I listed you simply said they "all agree with me" and refused to respond to EVEN ONE OF THEM. You sidestepped one single verse and answered something irrelevant instead.

Your ENTIRE argument process appears to consist of "I'm right and you're wrong" and you present no evidence but accuse everyone else of having no proof.

You are a troublemaker, and are only here to cause division - but as you will have noticed, as indicated by the number of likes my posts have, you are not causing division among us.

You sir are a wolf, with the single intent of deceiving, and overthrowing the faith of some.

You will fail on this forum.

And this is precisely why you refuse to give this board the basic courtesy of properly introducing yourself - this is what every false teacher has done when they come to this board, and this one action designates you as a false teacher.


How about then you answer the point about Genesis 17?

I know you can't but I want to see you squirm as you try.

And of course you still refuse to introduce yourself, which is just plain basic good manners and well known forum etiquette- but you care nothing for any of that because good manners is not a part of causing dissention, which is you intent.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

And I noted from the article that "at least one" could follow it back - thank you for confirming that and adding that the number according to that article is actually two.

 Not bad for a nation that you claim doesn't exist at all - you have confirmed that at least 2/12's of that nation still exist, which is enough to prove you are wrong.

If they still exist, the the others also do, and the God I believe in is certainly able to keep track of who is who, and call out 12000 from each tribe, even if He has to identify each and every individual.

The god that you follow is a liar, and is not powerful enough to know who is who.....

I will continue to follow the God of the Bible rather than your weak, counterfeit, lying god.



And you still refuse to do this board the basic courtesy of a proper introduction in the intro section.

Edited by DaveW
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
6 hours ago, Shoostie said:

It doesn't say you can follow them back.  It says some Jewish families have traditions (like Senator Warren's native American ancestry), which  is far short of your claim.  The article can't even provide one example of any genealogy that can be followed back to Israel. The best genealogy it has, it says was broken in the 1500s, and there's no verification of its credibility, even if it wasn't broken.   The facts don't support your doctrines. 

God made an everlasting covenant, but a covenant is a two-way agreement, which the Jews broke when they rejected Christ, and earlier when they worshiped pagan gods.  If the Jews could not break the covenant, why did God say Israel is not his people and he is not their God?   You won't see my squirm, but I'll see you squirm.





Once again you fail to read the Bible. In the first place, not all covenants are two way agreements. See Genesis 15.

Secondly the passage I quoted gives the entirety of this particular covenant and the condition for the Israelites is given in verse 14, and it applies to INDIVIDUALS, not the nation.

Read it. Read it carefully.

You are wrong.



Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
2 hours ago, Shoostie said:

You xxxxxxxxxx, he has said it far more than twice.  Maybe just twice in this thread.

I repeated it because you refused to do so. I stopped as soon as I was asked.

I would have stopped the moment you gave this board the proper respect of an intro.

Your foul descriptions however should not pass the keyboard of a Christian.

Edited by DaveW
Edited to remove the offending reference.
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

I actually think it is a bit of a pity this ended up like this.

I genuinely want such people to properly answer the points put to them. It helps me to understand the arguments.

Of course this guy was not properly responding in any case, but it is still a pity he decided to force the mods to act.

Thanks to the mods for acting appropriately and quickly by the way.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 9/16/2019 at 9:23 PM, John Young said:

Ezekiel 9, 47, 48 

  Actually, they DO; they just don't know their tribal or national identity now, except for the Jews. Remember. God said the coming 144K special witnesses would include 12K from each tribe. GOD knows who they are today.

  I readily admit they're likely mixed with other peoples, same as many Jews are, but if their genealogy could be traced to ancient times, they'd be from old Israel.

  And yes, there's SPIRITUAL  Israel, which can include anyone, racial Israeli or not. It consists of all Christians of all peoples. And it's separate from physical Israel.  God has plans for both physical and spiritual Israel, as He's made plain in Scripture.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

Ezekiel shows us that the 144,000 are sealed in Jerusalem at the abomination of desolation and that tribal affiliation will be based on what district of Israel they are living in. So not symbolic but literal people living in a literal Israel, in the actual land, sealed by a literal Angel (Ezekiel 9). Additionally Israel is a covenant relationship, not a racial, genetic, or cultural. The only saved Israelites will be part of the "Spiritual Israel". The false Jew will be cut off from the nation and those gentile believers who wish to enter the Israeli covenant must enter by the terms of that covenant, not by mere virtue of believing on Christ alone but must also be circumcised and keep the Passover every year, etc or be cut off from it. (Exodus 12:47-49, Numbers 19:13).

Edited by John Young
Link to post
Share on other sites

  No, a Christian is NOT required to follow the "Mosaic" law. remember, Scripture says that if one seex justification by keeping the law, one must keep every jot & tittle of it without fail, which no one but Jesus has ever done.

  There's no separate salvations for Israeli & gentile. There's but ONE way for all. And that's thru JESUS.  There are many Scriptures which make that clear. Here's an example:


Galatians 3:28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

The Law and the National covenant of Israel was never about giving salvation but about teaching us Sanctification and creating an environment in which it would be harder for sin to take root. Within the Law and the national covenant, sin's evil and destructive influence would be greatly reduced and Holy and helpful influences would increase. Within  that environment the goal was preservation of righteousness on earth and the lifting up of and drawing of men to the light of Christ.

Galatians 3:19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.

Edited by John Young
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By LindaR
      This is beautiful!  Please turn the sound slider down to about half way....it starts out way too loud.
    • By In the Cross
      On a recent missions trip to Israel, I put together a short documentary on a recent prophetic fulfillment in Northern Israel that is very significant for the time frame we are living in today.
      Isaiah 29;17-18  "Is it not yet a very little while,and Lebanon shall be turned into a fruitful field,and the fruitful field shall be esteemed as a forest?And in that day shall the deaf hear the words of the book,and the eyes of the blind shall see out of OBscurity,and out of darkness."

    • By Dr James Ach
      I want to start a topic here to dispel the satanic heresy that the current Jews that comprise that land of Israel are not real Jews, a theory in which denies that the current state of Israel is the fulfillment of numerous Bible prophecies regarding Israel returning to her land.
      I am going to post a link to a video here, which I have posted before, but I want it to be prominent in a primary topic thread so it does not get lost in the middle of random posts. The video was created by Chris White, an 18 minute video that packs a ton of information in a short time, so take notes, but it thoroughly debunks the anti semetic view that the current state of Israel is made of fake Jews called the Ashkenazi Jews. Not only does this video debunk this ridiculous notion that spits in God's face regarding fulfilled prophecy, but I am going to have a few questions to ponder over, with other proofs that today's Israel is the Israel that has fulfilled prophecy. I am going to assume that most are aware of this history of the Balfour Declaration debates between 1914-1918, and the date Israel declared their independence in 1948, so I won't repeat that at any length here.
      The Two Myths I want to debunk are: 1) That the current state of Israel is not the fulfillment of prophecy and 2) That the church did not take over as the Israel.
      The Current State of Israel is the Fulfillment of Bible Prophecy
      The contention is in a nutshell (the myth can be read on several places on the forum here) is that Lord Rothschild created the nation of Israel, the the flag of Israel is the number of the beast, and the current Jews living in Israel now are not real Jews and therefore no prophecy has been fulfilled.
      This defies common sense and history of the development of Zionism prior to Rothchilds involvement. There were numerous Zionist congresses held by Jews in the land of Israel long before Rothschild was involved. Even if Rothschild was involved in the Illuminati (which he certainly is) and had evil intentions, that regathering of Jews to Israel is not contingent upon the spiritual life of Rothschild, Theodore Herzl, Lord Balfour, or anyone else. The Bible never said that the regathering of Israel depended on their faithfulness, the regathering of Israel was a PROMISE made in Ezekial 37, and Zechariah 14, and the salvation of Israel can only come AFTER they have been regathered. God did not gather Israel back together based on whether or not those who assisted could be judged by their professions of faith, but because God intends on working through Israel to demonstrates His faithfulness to Abraham, and his wrath upon the Christ rejecting world.
      Just because Rothschild was not a Bible believing Christian, does not mean God does not use heathens to accomplish His purpose. God used heathens to assist Israel in rebuilding Jerusalem during the time of Nehemiah (in getting approval from heathen kings for materials and permission to build). Artaxerxes, Ahasuerus, Darius, et al, were certainly not godly kings, but God worked through and around them to accomplish His purpose in the rebuilding of Israel and the temple. Since Paul clearly states that the Jew is blinded until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled (Rom 11:25), how could anyone expect a godly Jewish people to reestablish the nation of Israel? The very first mention of the word "holy" in the Bible, is a reference to the land of Israel (Exodus 3), and God called the land Holy before any Jew occupied it. This demonstrates that God separated the land first, and then gathered the people to occupy it.
      The Bible is clear that the land of Israel in the end times will be occupied by unbelieving Jews. Rev 2:2, 2:9 and 3:9. But Jesus praises the Jewish churches for trying them which say they are Jews and are not. To identify a false Jew, there has to be a true Jew as a standard of comparison. The entire book of Revelation revolves around the nation of Israel, and yet there are unbelieving Jews present in the land. Does the unfaithfulness of Israel negate the promises of God? (2 Tim 2:13). The gifts and calling of God are without repentance and can not be revoked (Rom 11:26). There is not one place in Scripture where the promise to regather Israel was based upon their acceptance of the Messiah FIRST. The fact is they are punished during the tribulation for their rejection of the Messiah, they will "finish the transgression" that was left out of the 70th week of Daniel. But they can not be purged unless they are regathered FIRST, and THEN they will be given the opportunity to receive Christ during the tribulation.
      And just a parenthetical comment here about whether it is a 7 year tribulation. Not only is it a 7 year period based on Daniels 70th week, but read Revelation ch 11-13 carefully. Revelation is NOT in chronological order, and if you notice the time lines given of the 2 witness and the beast, they total 7 years. Now notice the 2 witnesses are said to prophesy "a thousand two hundred and threescore days" Rev 11:3, now note that this ministry comes BEFORE the second woe of Rev 11:14. So these 2 witnesses preached for 3 1/2 years BEFORE THE SECOND WOE. Note that. Now notice the third woe is given in Rev 12:10 "woe unto the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea, for the devil is come down unto having great wrath because he knoweth that he hath but a short time". And how much time does he have? "and power was given unto him to continue forty and two months" Rev 13:5. Now do the math, 2 witnesses preach for 3 1/2 years BEFORE THE SECOND WOE, and the beast wreaks havoc for 3 1/2 year AFTER THE THIRD WOE. That's 7 years.
      Now back to Israel.
      Here's a common sense question for those that claim that the current Israeli's are not real Jews. Since it is clear that the land of Israel is now occupied by a nation that has a charter called Israel, and there's no disputing that the land traditionally known as Israel, is now called Israel again, if the real Jews show up somewhere, WHERE ARE THEY GOING TO SET UP ANOTHER LAND? If the "real Jews' are supposed to access the real Israel, and that Israel is already occupied, then where would the "real" Jews go??
      And I'll get the following subject in a minute, but if it is claimed that the church is the real Jew, than WHY ISN'T THE CHURCH FLOCKING TO ISRAEL? And why is there no mention any where in the Bible of God regathering his CHURCH BACK TO ISRAEL?
      The argument is made that since the Jews are made of  nothing but immigrants, that they are not real Jews. Well DUH, they were scattered all over the earth. A prophecy about "RE gathering" implies that had to be scattered. None of us American's that live here now call ourselves English-Americans, or French Americans or Russian Americans (funny that we force blacks to call themselves African Americans). We all refer to ourselves as AMERICANS even though every one of us are immigrants.
      The arguments above, and the video are sufficient to prove that the current nation of Israel is the nation that God regathered in fulfillment of numerous prophecies.
      The Church is Not Israel
      *GRRRRRRR all of my external links went to a NKJV. Please look them up in a KJV.
      The claim that the church has inherited all of the promises of the covenants to Israel and thus has replaced Israel is probably the most popular that unites all 3 views. All 3 views deny that God will restore the literal nation of Israel in the end times. The historicists and preterists even go so far as to blame the  dispensationalist view of those who believe in the literal restoration of Israel  on a Jesuit priest named Ribera in the 1500s. The claim is that the Catholic church (RCC) need a response to the claims that Revelation pointed to the RCC as the whore of Babylon, and thus Ribera created futurism which was then later passed on to John Darby, then to Scofield and Larkin.
      Not only is that claim historically absurd due to the early church "fathers" that also held to a futuristic view, but Ribera's commentary was never translated from Latin and there is no evidence that Darby ever read his works and he never referenced them. Furthermore, Ribera's only similarity from what I have read is that there will be a future kingdom, there is nothing remotely similar about Ribera's writings and the pre-millenial views. Moreover, the RCC has never believed in pre-millenialism or a pre-tribulation rapture, and those who hold to those views still identify the RCC as the beast and the antichrist so whatever views are attributed to Ribera, do not look like the scheme worked even if it were true.
      This subject has had entire volumes written about it so I won't do much justice to the subject here, but just a few short observations from Romans 9-11 which is a death blow to all 3 views regarding Israel:
      *Paul argues that "hath God cast away his people that he foreknew?" Romans 11:1-2. So clearly, the contention is that someone had been cast away due to the dispensation of grace. If the church had replaced Israel, this question would not even be up for debate with Paul. If the church replaced Israel, why would the question be asked if God cast away His church which He foreknew? Who was Paul referring to that was cast away and that God foreknew? Surely Paul is talking about the literal Hebrews, and he answers the question with a resounding NO.
      *Paul describes the nation of Israel as his brothers "according to the flesh". Rom 9:3. The church are not Paul's brothers according to the flesh, church members are made family by adoption through the Holy Spirit, not by promise of covenants with Israel. Rom 8:23. Thus Paul sets the entire tone of Romans chs 9-11 by identifying his discourse about Israel as being his physical lineage, not about promises given to the church by transference.
      *The other view often cite Luke 13 where Jesus cursed the fig tree as evidence that Israel will never be restored. However, Rom 11:15clearly shows that God will raise Israel as a nation "from the dead". Therefore Luke 13 can only be temporary as is confirmed by Paul in Romans 11:25.
      *Paul repeatedly makes distinctions between the Jews and Greeks (gentiles) throughout Scripture (Rom 1:16, Acts 28:29 which you will only find in a KJV). In Rom 11:13, Paul confirms that he is the apostle to the Gentiles and makes the distinction between his office over the Gentiles, and those who are of his flesh (v 14).
      *Revelation 7:4-8 clearly shows that during the tribulation, 144,000 Jews will be sealed. If those who profess that the church replaced Israel, then let me ask to which of the twelve tribes listed in Rev 7:5-8 do you belong to?
      *It is obvious from Daniel 9:25-27, 2 Thess 2:1-12, and Rev 11:1-2 that there will be temple rites practiced again during the tribulation, such as would not be practiced by the church. Furthermore, saints saved during the tribulation are said to "sing the song of Moses and of the Lamb". The church would not be singing the song of Moses, that is a clear indication that there will be literal, physical blood-line Jews present during the tribulation that are saved in accordance to God's promises to them in the OT and Paul's statement in Romans 11:26.
      * I mentioned this early but worth saying again. In Rev 2:2, 2:9, and 3:9, Jesus praises the Jewish churches for identify false Jews. First thing to note, is that in order to identifying a false Jew, there needs to be a true Jew as a standard of comparison. Secondly, there is nowhere in the epistles to the church where a Gentile believer is admonished to "try them which say they are Jews and are not". During the dispensation of grace, there is neither "Jew nor Greek" (Gal 3:27-28), but in Revelation 2-3, the emphasis is back on the Jew.
      Another thing to note about Romans 11:26 where Paul says "all Israel will be saved", if that was a reference to the church, would that not be redundant? The church is sealed right now (Eph 4:30, 1:13), there is no possible loss of that salvation so why would Paul make a reference to a future salvation of the church? That makes it obvious that Paul is referring to a future salvation of Israel as a nation, and not to a future salvation that is made up of Gentile believers.
      *If the church replaced Israel, why would Paul bother writing an entire book to HEBREWS, and James write a book "to the twelve tribes scattered abroad"?
      The church is under a completely different calling and set of prescriptions than the nation of Israel, and the confusion over Bible prophecy is the failure to understand the difference between the two. The church is a "mystery" not previously known, Eph 3:1-12, Col  1:26-27. Jesus said, "on this rock I will build my church", thus the church can not be Israel because the church is in a building process build separate from the nation of Israel which will culminate when the voice John hears that speaks as a trumpet (and notice this trumpet sounds before the 7 trumpets begin) tells the church to come up hither. Rev 4:1.
      Additional Signs That Validate The Current State of Israel
      The following are numerous signs that have occurred in Israel that show that God is fulfilling prophecy in the CURRENT land of Israel.
      *A PURE LANGUAGE: "I will restore until the peoples a pure language" Zeph 3:9. For nearly 2000 years, Israel has been scattered through out the earth, yet in the last 50 years, they have revived the Hebrew language spoken as it was 2000 years ago.
      *ISRAEL BECAME A NATION IN A DAY: Despite the reneging by Churchill on the Balfour Declaration that chopped up the land of Israel, and the opposition of their enemies, in ONE DAY Israel became a nation in fulfillment of Isaiah 66:8. Not only that, but when they were regathered, the ORDER that they would be gathered in was predicted. Isa 43:5-6, and 21.
      *LAND DIVIDED FOR GAIN. Winston Churchill and the UN and the Pope refused to allow the Jews all of the land that they claimed as part of their heritage with the borders listed in Deut and Joshua, and divided the land for gain. Joel 3:1-2. 
      *ISRAEL BECOMES CENTER OF WORLD CONTENTION: Israel is said to be a stumbling block to all the nations and there can be no question today that all of the conflicts in the middle east revolve around the nation of Israel. Zech 12:3
      *THE SHEKEL REVIVED: For 2000 years Israel had not national currency, and now that they have been regathered and restored as a nation, they have revived the currency of the shekel as predicted in Ezek 45:12-16.
      *ISRAEL BARREN LAND BECOMES PRODUCTIVE AGAIN: For 2000 years that land of Israel was barren, dessert, even under the occupation of Turks, and other Arabs and the Ottoman empire, there was never any agriculture in the land,and no forestation, but now Israel produces more fruit (particularly the grapes) to rival the largest producers in the world. Isaiah 26:6, Isaiah 35:1-2.
      There are scores of other prophecies that I could list here, but these demonstrate clearly that the CURRENT land of Israel not only fulfilled prophecy in it's regathering, but is CONTINUING to fulfill prophecy, and will be the center of prophecy during the coming great tribulation.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 23 Guests (See full list)

  • Create New...