Jump to content
Online Baptist

Recommended Posts

  • Members
1 minute ago, No Nicolaitans said:

 

Of course, but does God control, choose, and decide whom will be saved, and does God control, choose, and decide who will not be saved?

In an earlier post, you said...

I asked a sincere question in order to better understand your position. You said you were open to answering questions (with a caveat) and you would talk about what Calvinism actually teaches (with a caveat). Rather than answering the question and taking the opportunity to...

  1. Affirm whether I was correct in my understanding, and...
  2. Taking the opportunity to talk about what Calvinism actually teaches regarding my question

...sadly, you gave an answer that did neither. 

 

You asked if God controls who is saved. 

I asked you who saves if not God. 

How would that not indicate to anyone who has even a modicum of reading comprehension that God has at least some say in who He saves?

Or are you a proponent of open theism by which God does not know the future nor have any control over the world?

Is God not sovereign over who He saves? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 307
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You know, my observation of Calvinism is that a) it isn't learned from the Bible - it comes from the teaching of men - many books and 'much learning' - and b) it presents itself as an intellectual doc

OK, if Bro. Dave will not "rag on MacArthur" I will. I will also disagree with Bro. Dave where he said that MacArthur needs to be taken very carefully. I don't think he should be "taken" at all. MacAr

Deserves a double "like" in my opinion. ;)

  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
4 minutes ago, D-28 Player said:

You asked if God controls who is saved. 

I asked you who saves if not God. 

How would that not indicate to anyone who has even a modicum of reading comprehension that God has at least some say in who He saves?

Or are you a proponent of open theism by which God does not know the future nor have any control over the world?

Is God not sovereign over who He saves? 

I gots skoolin'. 

Okay, I'll stop asking questions. Have a nice day.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
4 minutes ago, D-28 Player said:

OK. 

You spent more time describing open theism than answering my actual question...which you still didn't answer. That's fine. I asked a direct question, and you gave a vague question in response rather than giving a direct answer...which you still didn't answer. You then resorted to questioning my intelligence...and you still haven't answered the question. 

It was a simple yes or no answer...

Me: Do you believe "this"?

You: Yes (or no).

That's okay, I've been around this block too many times in the past. I was actually giving you the opportunity to do what you said you would do (answer questions and talk about what Calvinism teaches), and I was doing it respectfully. However, I will bow out of this thread now and let others play the game with you. 

Now, I's gone see if I's can find somere's else to dally around wit.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
20 minutes ago, No Nicolaitans said:

You spent more time describing open theism than answering my actual question...which you still didn't answer. That's fine. I asked a direct question, and you gave a vague question in response rather than giving a direct answer...which you still didn't answer. You then resorted to questioning my intelligence...and you still haven't answered the question. 

It was a simple yes or no answer...

Me: Do you believe "this"?

You: Yes (or no).

That's okay, I've been around this block too many times in the past. I was actually giving you the opportunity to do what you said you would do (answer questions and talk about what Calvinism teaches), and I was doing it respectfully. However, I will bow out of this thread now and let others play the game with you. 

Now, I's gone see if I's can find somere's else to dally around wit.

 

Third time: YES, GOD IS NOT A SPECTATOR IN SALVATION. GOD CONTROLS SALVATION.

Second time: Yes, God does choose, and decide whom will be saved, but does not "control" who will be saved, as I believe you mean "control" in this instance to mean "to force against their will".

 To believe otherwise is open theism, which is heresy. 

 

 

 

Edited by D-28 Player
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist

 

6 minutes ago, D-28 Player said:

Third time: YES, GOD IS NOT A SPECTATOR IN SALVATION GOD CONTROLS SALVATION.

Second time: Yes, God does choose, and decide whom will be saved, but does not "control" who will be saved, as I believe you mean "control" in this instance to mean "to force against their will".

 To believe otherwise is open theism, which is heresy. 

 

 

 

I have three robotic machines in my shop. i decide what they will do, program them and they do it.  but (technically) I do not control or force them against their will either...because they're robots.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
Just now, heartstrings said:

 

I have three robotic machines in my shop. i decide what they will do, program them and they do it.  but (technically) I do not control or force them against their will either...because they're robots.

Another straw man. Calvinists do not believe that God "programs" men or that men are "robots".  

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
7 minutes ago, D-28 Player said:

Men are saved by repentance and faith in Christ.

Indeed. But how are lost sinners REGENERATED? 

Are they regenerated THROUGH repentance and faith?  Or, are they regenerated BEFORE repentance and faith, and thus NOT through repentance and faith?

(Note: If you continue as you have, I shall expect you to provide me with . . . no answer at all to my question.)

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Member

I know a pastor who was Gospel Standard Baptist (Strict and particular, i.e. hyper Calvinist) who said we become Christians because we want to go to heaven.  HS once posted on here that he became a Christian because he didn't want to go to hell.  I see no difference in the two, both are false beliefs.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
20 minutes ago, Pastor Scott Markle said:

Indeed. But how are lost sinners REGENERATED? 

Are they regenerated THROUGH repentance and faith?  Or, are they regenerated BEFORE repentance and faith, and thus NOT through repentance and faith?

(Note: If you continue as you have, I shall expect you to provide me with . . . no answer at all to my question.)

And if you continue as you have I will expect you to be unnecessarily aggressive and rude.

Just as a physically dead man cannot dial 911 to call for help, so a spiritually dead man cannot call on God for salvation lest the ability be granted to him by God. Please note that this means that regeneration must take place before man can repent or express faith in Christ, thus meaning that I have answered your question and any further claims that I have not are simply not true. 

You don't believe that and you won't accept any answer I give you and, at this point, I don't really care. 

Honestly, what we're seeing right now is precisely why IFBs have the reputation that you have. 

 

 

15 minutes ago, Invicta said:

I know a pastor who was Gospel Standard Baptist (Strict and particular, i.e. hyper Calvinist) who said we become Christians because we want to go to heaven.  HS once posted on here that he became a Christian because he didn't want to go to hell.  I see no difference in the two, both are false beliefs.

If he had said that he became a Christian by not wanting to go to Hell, that would have been a false belief. But I think that repenting and receiving Christ because you fear Hell and understand that Christ is God's remedy for sin and that Christ died to assuage God's wrath is perfectly reasonable. 

Edited by D-28 Player
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
13 minutes ago, D-28 Player said:

And if you continue as you have I will expect you to be unnecessarily aggressive and rude.

Just as a physically dead man cannot dial 911 to call for help, so a spiritually dead man cannot call on God for salvation lest the ability be granted to him by God. Please note that this means that regeneration must take place before man can repent or express faith in Christ, thus meaning that I have answered your question and any further claims that I have not are simply not true. 

Brother "D-28 Player,"

Actually, I already knew the Calvinistic position on this matter.  Indeed, the Calvinistic system presents the matter as follows:

1.  A lost sinner is spiritually dead, such that he or she has no ability or desire whatsoever to come unto Christ in faith apart from some work of God's grace upon that sinner.

2.  The work of God's grace whereby a sinner is made able to come unto Christ in faith is the divine work of regeneration.  (By the way, this certainly means that within the Calvinistic system the divine work of regeneration is NOT AT ALL through faith, but is rather UNTO faith.)

3.  When God determines to engage His work of regeneration upon a lost sinner, He does so through an irresistible grace, such that the lost sinner CANNOT PREVENT his own regeneration (even if he did not want to be regenerated).

4.  Once God has engaged His work of regeneration upon a lost sinner, that lost sinner is now ABLE to come unto Christ in faith.

5.  Furthermore, once God has engaged His work of regeneration upon a lost sinner, that lost sinner most certainly WILL come unto Christ in faith, specifically because God's work of regeneration changed that sinner's will (desire) so that he or she now CERTAINLY WILLS (desires) to come unto Christ in faith.

6.  As such, EVERY sinner upon whom God engages His work of regeneration WILL CERTAINLY come unto Christ in faith.

7.  Then by God's grace through that sinner's faith, that sinner will be forgiven, justified, saved, reconciled, sealed, sanctified, and glorified.
 

22 minutes ago, D-28 Player said:

Honestly, what we're seeing right now is precisely why IFBs have the reputation that you have. 

Indeed, now you have actually answered my question.  IF you had done so after the first time wherein I had asked the question, I would NOT have had to ask FOUR more times or to place greater amounts of pressure in the repeated asking thereof.  Nor would I have been compelled to express reproof in my repeated questioning.

For the sake of the audience, I would challenge all to go back unto the first time wherein I asked my question (here) to discern if my question was originally presented in a "rude" manner.  I believe that will you also find that the second time wherein I asked my question (here) it was not in a "rude" manner.  I also believe that will you find that the third time wherein I asked my question (here) it was not in a "rude" manner.  In fact, it was not until the FOURTH time wherein I asked my question (here) that I began to challenge Brother "D-28 Player's" avoidance of my question.  As such, in that fourth time wherein I asked my question, I did indeed reprove him for that avoidance.  Finally, after the FIFTH time wherein I asked my question (here), in which I again expressed a reproof of his avoidance, Brother "D-28 Player" actually did answer my question.  Even so, although I certainly acknowledge that I expressed reproof, I do NOT at all accept the accusation that I committed the sin of "rudeness." 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
52 minutes ago, D-28 Player said:

Just as a physically dead man cannot dial 911 to call for help, so a spiritually dead man cannot call on God for salvation lest the ability be granted to him by God. Please note that this means that regeneration must take place before man can repent or express faith in Christ, thus meaning that I have answered your question and any further claims that I have not are simply not true. 

You don't believe that and you won't accept any answer I give you and, at this point, I don't really care. 

Brother "D-28 Player,"

You are indeed correct. I do NOT agree with all that you have presented above, but I DO agree with some of it.  Therefore, allow me to present a Biblical examination of that which you have presented.

1.  In your first sentence you state -- "Just as a physically dead man cannot dial 911 to call for help, so a spiritually dead man cannot call on God for salvation lest the ability be granted to him by God."  I myself AGREE that a spiritually lost and dead sinner as NO ability whatsoever within himself or herself to come unto Christ in faith for salvation, and thus that a spiritually lost and dead sinner CANNOT come unto Christ in faith for salvation except God graciously grant ability unto him or her.

2.  In your second sentence you state -- "Please note that this means that regeneration must take place before man can repent or express faith in Christ."  Herein you present God's work of regeneration as the ONLY possible means whereby God could grant a spiritually lost and dead sinner the ability to come unto Christ in faith for salvation.  Yet our Lord Jesus Christ Himself did NOT present God's work of regeneration as the means whereby God graciously grants this ability unto a spiritually lost and dead sinner.  In John 6:44 our Lord Jesus Christ declared, "No man can come to me, except the Father which hath sent me draw him: and I will raise him up at the last day."  Herein we notice that our Lord Jesus Christ spoke about the ability to come unto Him in faith for salvation.  Yet our Lord Jesus Christ did NOT speak about the regenerating work of God as the means whereby He grants that ability.  Rather, our Lord Jesus Christ very specifically spoke about the DRAWING work of God as the means whereby He grants that ability.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Advanced Member
20 hours ago, heartstrings said:

Not the whole story. When I got saved, God convicted me of Sin, Righteousness, and Judgment. Through the preaching of the Gospel and the wooing power (drawing) of the Holy Ghost, I was "convinced" of my sin, the Righteousness of God, and the damnation of Hell. I turned TO Jesus FROM sin and Hell. In order to be saved a person MUST realize there is something to be "saved" FROM and fully believe he DESERVES to go there. That something, the Bible says, is Hell. Jesus warned about it.  That is not false doctrine my friend: it is Biblical. 

Thanks for the update.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
22 hours ago, D-28 Player said:

Just as a physically dead man cannot dial 911 to call for help, so a spiritually dead man cannot call on God for salvation lest the ability be granted to him by God. Please note that this means that regeneration must take place before man can repent or express faith in Christ, thus meaning that I have answered your question and any further claims that I have not are simply not true. 

And God has granted all people this ability when He poured out His Spirit over all flesh at Pentecost. Acts 2:17 & John 16:8. It is never granted selectively my friend.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Moderators
31 minutes ago, D-28 Player said:

Universalism is heresy and the unregenerate do not have the indwelling of the Holy Spirit 

Talk anout your strawmen! No one mentioned universalism except you. I suspect your universalism and my universalism are a bit different.

Universalism is the heretical idea that all men will eventually be saved and enter eternity with the Lord. THAT is universalism. From your answer, yours would be that Christ died for all men's sins, and His sacrifice was efficacious to save all men, if they came to Him. That isn't universalism, that is biblical truth.

I keep hearing about how important logic is to the Calvinst position. Not here, but from another source, a reformed preacher I know, and he says it is not possible for God to do anything that is against logic. Ergo, a sovereign God CANNOT allow His creation to have any ability to receive or reject Him. Not logical.  Logic doesn't come into play, because man can't hope to grasp the most basic aspects of God's logic. However, if it IS about logic, even then, Calvinism fails, because logically, there is no point to the Bible, no point for the morality lessons contained therein, for any law to be given, for any preaching of the gospel to occur, because those destined to damnation with no hope to ever change because God hath declared it to be so, can never learn from the errors and sins of those in scripture, and those destined to salvation don't need it. So unless God is just having a great laugh at the expense of the billions He is sending to hell and judging guilty while denying them any opportunity to turn and repent, God would be the most illogical being to exist.

true justice and mercy are to be found in scripture: that a child was not to be judged for the sin of the parent, and vice-versa, tells me that God judges righteously-he gives His law and those who choose to follow it, (be it the law of Moses or the law of Christ), find mercy and salvation, and those who do not are judged sinners and lawbreakers and punished accordingly. But they have the ability to choose to keep or break those laws, and even the worst have found repentance in them. So we must assume that God gave the law based upon His method of judging, which is, we have a choice to follow and be blessed, or reject and disobey and be judged guilty.  But a God who says "Repent!" but has already removed any ability to repent, is a god unjust.  Acts 17:30 "And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:" Does he command, but not allow? I think not.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
2 minutes ago, Ukulelemike said:

Talk anout your strawmen! No one mentioned universalism except you. I suspect your universalism and my universalism are a bit different.

 

However, if it IS about logic, even then, Calvinism fails, because logically, there is no point to the Bible, no point for the morality lessons contained therein, for any law to be given, for any preaching of the gospel to occur, because those destined to damnation with no hope to ever change because God hath declared it to be so, can never learn from the errors and sins of those in scripture, and those destined to salvation don't need it. So unless God is just having a great laugh at the expense of the billions He is sending to hell and judging guilty while denying them any opportunity to turn and repent, God would be the most illogical being to exist.

true justice and mercy are to be found in scripture: that a child was not to be judged for the sin of the parent, and vice-versa, tells me that God judges righteously-he gives His law and those who choose to follow it, (be it the law of Moses or the law of Christ), find mercy and salvation, and those who do not are judged sinners and lawbreakers and punished accordingly. But they have the ability to choose to keep or break those laws, and even the worst have found repentance in them. So we must assume that God gave the law based upon His method of judging, which is, we have a choice to follow and be blessed, or reject and disobey and be judged guilty.  But a God who says "Repent!" but has already removed any ability to repent, is a god unjust.  Acts 17:30 "And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:" Does he command, but not allow? I think not.

Well that's a very creative description of Calvinism you have there. 

So have you kept the law?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Moderators
3 minutes ago, D-28 Player said:

Well that's a very creative description of Calvinism you have there. 

So have you kept the law?

My point wasn't that we have to keep the law, my point was that God based the law He gave to man upon His own sense of justice. It would seem odd that He would demand of us something He would not practice Himself in that respect. And as I said, it comes from a Calvinst preacher, not myself. I know, though, that there are many brands of 'Calvinism". You are just of a different brand than him, apparently.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
19 hours ago, Ukulelemike said:

However, if it IS about logic, even then, Calvinism fails, because logically, there is no point to the Bible, no point for the morality lessons contained therein, for any law to be given, for any preaching of the gospel to occur, because those destined to damnation with no hope to ever change because God hath declared it to be so, can never learn from the errors and sins of those in scripture, and those destined to salvation don't need it.

Amen, I thought about saying similar yesterday but, thought I would listen longer. Also, there would be no point to use the serpent in the wilderness and tie it to Christ. John 3:14-16. This just reinforces the fact we have been given a choice to receive or reject the free gift given through Jesus Christ.

D-28 sometimes a man can be so determined to win an argument that he can lose what eternal is and why we preach the word in truth.

Edited by 1Timothy115
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
Just now, D-28 Player said:

I agree 

We preach the Word in truth that the lost might be saved

From what I've seen in your writings I don't believe there is harmony between our understanding of "word of truth" or who "the lost" are. If you're truly a Calvinist then we cannot walk together -- in the agreed sense. "Whosoever will" is what I believe and Calvinism does not agree. To borrow from Hamlet, I must admit that you "...doth protest too much, methinks".

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Moderators
28 minutes ago, D-28 Player said:

It's unfortunate that you feel you have to slander Calvinists in order to defend your beliefs but that's up to you I guess 

 

 

It is only slander if it is intentionally false. Since it is not false, it isn't slander.

Besides, he said "Calvinism" not "Calvinists". Calvinism clearly does not believe in 'whosoever will', but 'whosoever God allows to will, by His will, and no will of their own."

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
21 hours ago, Ukulelemike said:

true justice and mercy are to be found in scripture: that a child was not to be judged for the sin of the parent, and vice-versa, tells me that God judges righteously-he gives His law and those who choose to follow it, (be it the law of Moses or the law of Christ), find mercy and salvation, and those who do not are judged sinners and lawbreakers and punished accordingly. But they have the ability to choose to keep or break those laws, and even the worst have found repentance in them. So we must assume that God gave the law based upon His method of judging, which is, we have a choice to follow and be blessed, or reject and disobey and be judged guilty.  But a God who says "Repent!" but has already removed any ability to repent, is a god unjust.  Acts 17:30 "And the times of this ignorance God winked at; but now commandeth all men every where to repent:" Does he command, but not allow? I think not

Amen!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
1 hour ago, Ukulelemike said:

It is only slander if it is intentionally false. Since it is not false, it isn't slander.

Besides, he said "Calvinism" not "Calvinists". Calvinism clearly does not believe in 'whosoever will', but 'whosoever God allows to will, by His will, and no will of their own."

 

Calvinists believe and Calvinism teaches that whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. If you want to pretend they don't that's your problem. 

"Whosoever". Period.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
6 minutes ago, D-28 Player said:

Calvinists believe and Calvinism teaches that whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. If you want to pretend they don't that's your problem. 

"Whosoever". Period.

Yet the Calvinistic system also teaches that the "whosoever" can only be the "whosoever" if the Lord our God FIRST grants them both the ability and the desire to believe through His irresistibly gracious work of regeneration.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
1 hour ago, D-28 Player said:

Still "whosoever"

Indeed.  Yet while the Calvinistic system teaches that "whosoever SHALL CALL upon the name of the Lord shall be saved," the Calvinistic system also teaches that NOT all human individuals shall have the ABILITY to be a part of that "whosoever."  This is not simply a contradiction of "universalism," such that NOT all human individuals WILL call upon the name of the Lord and thus receive salvation.  Rather, this is a contradiction of ABILITY, such that NOT all human individuals are even granted God's grace to be ABLE to call upon the name of the Lord and thus receive salvation.  Thus the Calvinistic system teaches -- "whosoever SHALL call;" but it does NOT teach -- "whosoever CAN call."

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
On ‎4‎/‎3‎/‎2017 at 5:59 PM, D-28 Player said:

I really hope you're not implying that Calvinists don't believe salvation is by grace through faith in Christ because, if you are, that would be bearing false witness. 

On ‎4‎/‎4‎/‎2017 at 0:38 PM, D-28 Player said:

If you really believe this is what Calvinists believe, then somebody has mislead you. 

No Calvinist would tell you to place your faith in some "system", but to repent and place your faith in Christ and His finished work on the cross.

On ‎4‎/‎4‎/‎2017 at 2:20 PM, D-28 Player said:

Well that's a very creative interpretation of Reformed theology

On ‎4‎/‎4‎/‎2017 at 2:30 PM, D-28 Player said:

The fact remains that if you walked into a room full of Calvinists and claimed that Calvinists believe these things you would be laughed out of the room 

On ‎4‎/‎4‎/‎2017 at 2:40 PM, D-28 Player said:

I'm open to answering questions but I don't believe it's reasonable or honest to expect me to defend beliefs you ascribe to Calvinists as opposed to beliefs Calvinists actually hold and which Calvinism actually teaches,  

If you want to talk about what Calvinism actually teaches fine. But if you're just going to throw out a bunch of straw men and talking points then I'm just going to ignore that. 

On ‎4‎/‎4‎/‎2017 at 5:42 PM, D-28 Player said:

Another straw man. Calvinists do not believe that God "programs" men or that men are "robots".  

On ‎4‎/‎5‎/‎2017 at 7:29 PM, D-28 Player said:

Well that's a very creative description of Calvinism you have there. 

3 hours ago, D-28 Player said:

It's unfortunate that you feel you have to slander Calvinists in order to defend your beliefs but that's up to you I guess 

Brother "D-28 Player,"

Throughout this thread discussion, you have indicated numerous times that some individual does not in some manner correctly understand the Calvinistic system of belief.

Now, in an earlier posting I presented the following seven points concerning the Calvinistic system of belief:

On ‎4‎/‎4‎/‎2017 at 7:02 PM, Pastor Scott Markle said:

Indeed, the Calvinistic system presents the matter as follows:

1.  A lost sinner is spiritually dead, such that he or she has no ability or desire whatsoever to come unto Christ in faith apart from some work of God's grace upon that sinner.

2.  The work of God's grace whereby a sinner is made able to come unto Christ in faith is the divine work of regeneration.  (By the way, this certainly means that within the Calvinistic system the divine work of regeneration is NOT AT ALL through faith, but is rather UNTO faith.)

3.  When God determines to engage His work of regeneration upon a lost sinner, He does so through an irresistible grace, such that the lost sinner CANNOT PREVENT his own regeneration (even if he did not want to be regenerated).

4.  Once God has engaged His work of regeneration upon a lost sinner, that lost sinner is now ABLE to come unto Christ in faith.

5.  Furthermore, once God has engaged His work of regeneration upon a lost sinner, that lost sinner most certainly WILL come unto Christ in faith, specifically because God's work of regeneration changed that sinner's will (desire) so that he or she now CERTAINLY WILLS (desires) to come unto Christ in faith.

6.  As such, EVERY sinner upon whom God engages His work of regeneration WILL CERTAINLY come unto Christ in faith.

7.  Then by God's grace through that sinner's faith, that sinner will be forgiven, justified, saved, reconciled, sealed, sanctified, and glorified.

Would you please reveal (according to your viewpoint) if in any of these seven points I have presented a misunderstanding of the Calvinistic system of belief?

Edited by Pastor Scott Markle
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members
9 minutes ago, Pastor Scott Markle said:

Would you please reveal (according to your viewpoint) if in any of these seven points, I have presented a misunderstanding of the Calvinistic system of belief?

Nothing I would argue with (except the "according to your understanding" dig)

Why does it matter to you if you've presented a misunderstanding? 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
6 minutes ago, D-28 Player said:

Nothing I would argue with (except the "according to your understanding" dig)

Why does it matter to you if you've presented a misunderstanding? 

Brother "D-28 Player,"

The "according to your viewpoint" parenthetical was not intended at all as a "dig."  Rather, it was intended as a recognition that different proponents of Calvinism may have slightly different viewpoints on the details of the Calvinistic system, and thus also a recognition that I was asking specifically in relation to your own viewpoint as the representative Calvinist in this thread discussion.

As to why it matters -- It appears (at least from my viewpoint) that one of your primary responses throughout this thread discussion has been the claim that various individuals did not correctly understand the Calvinistic system.  Yet you had not responded unto my presentation above at all.  Therefore, I was seeking for a confirmation of your recognition that I DO actually understand the Calvinistic system.  As such, we now have a foundation upon which to discuss the precise details of disagreement without the "you do not really understand" rhetoric.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Independent Fundamental Baptist
On Wed Feb 22 2017 at 6:51 AM, DaveW said:

Because it was asked, and it is not appropriate to further pollute that thread.

 

MacArthur promotes:

  • multiple bible (per)versions.
  • Calvinism (and I don't care what name you put on it).
  • Progressive worship.
  • "Elder rule".
  • Universal church.

Although I wouldn't recommend going to his site, if you do, all these things are cleatly evident.

He does get some things right, but 90% of rat poison is good food - it is the 10% that is dangerous.

 

I actually find it funny that there has been very little discussion about any other aspect of Macarthur's false doctrines, but it certainly has attracted the Calvinists from their hidey holes.

This reinforces my observations that Calvinist will throw out many solid doctrines in pursuit of their Calvinism.

A question by a non-calvinist about elder rule, I think someone questioned universal church, which was also answered.

Not one person has queried the multiple versions or the progressive worship, and as fat as I can tell none of these who are calvinists care about any of his other false teaching.

They appear to be happy with his universal church, his polity, his Bible versions, and his worldly "worship" just so long as he is a calvinist.

 

After all, this thread was originally about Macarthur, not calvinism specifically......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 41 Guests (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...