Jump to content
  • Welcome Guest

    For an ad free experience on Online Baptist, Please login or register for free

"Mark Them"


Recommended Posts

  • Members
4 hours ago, wretched said:

Sorry friend

I am as dispensational as the next guy and probably more so but I cannot subscribe to this idea that any whole Book in the NT is non-applicable to every man and woman. Besides, Paul wrote Hebrews and that fact is beyond any shadow of doubt in my mind.

Then Leviticus should be equally applicable, as it is part of the entire "Word of God", written to us Christians.  I believe that 7th Day Adventists take this position.  Since the Jews rejected Jesus, and hence their "inheritance",  then all the Book is written to "us" and for "us" and there never was a group of disciples that believed that the King would return to immediately set-up his "earthly" Kingdom.. right?

PS: They have been saying for 1700 years that the "Temple Mount" is where the Temple was located, so it MUST be so.... just like the King James translators put Paul's name on "Hebrews".

Edited by beameup
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
6 hours ago, wretched said:

Sorry friend

I am as dispensational as the next guy and probably more so but I cannot subscribe to this idea that any whole Book in the NT is non-applicable to every man and woman. Besides, Paul wrote Hebrews and that fact is beyond any shadow of doubt in my mind.

NT means New Testament

2 hours ago, beameup said:

Then Leviticus should be equally applicable, as it is part of the entire "Word of God", written to us Christians.  I believe that 7th Day Adventists take this position.  Since the Jews rejected Jesus, and hence their "inheritance",  then all the Book is written to "us" and for "us" and there never was a group of disciples that believed that the King would return to immediately set-up his "earthly" Kingdom.. right?

PS: They have been saying for 1700 years that the "Temple Mount" is where the Temple was located, so it MUST be so.... just like the King James translators put Paul's name on "Hebrews".

Leviticus is in the Old Testament

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
1 minute ago, MountainChristian said:

NT means New Testament

Leviticus is in the Old Testament

So what?  It's all the "Word of God".   And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: Mark 9:43

All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 2 Tim 3:16  (all same-same, right?)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
6 hours ago, beameup said:

And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: Mark 9:43

AMEN!  I myself am certainly prepared to express my "amen" to the preaching of our Lord Jesus Christ in Mark 9:43.  Are you?  Indeed, I myself am willing to accept that the point of this instruction from our Lord Jesus Christ is just as applicable today as it was when He preached it.  I wonder do you disagree with the rest of the verse -- "And if thy hand offend thee, cut it off: it is better for thee to enter into life maimed, than having two hands to go into hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched."  Would it now be better for someone "having two hands" to go "into the fire that never shall be quenched," than "to enter into life maimed"?

6 hours ago, beameup said:

All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 2 Tim 3:16  (all same-same, right?)
(emphasis added by Pastor Scott Markle)

So then, are you questioning the truthfulness of 2 Timothy 3:16?  Yea, doth God's Word say -- "All Scripture"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Administrators

We get the point Beameup. Unfortunately the "point" has been rejected by you in favor of your own private interpretations.

 1Ti 1:18This charge I commit unto thee, son Timothy, according to the prophecies which went before on thee, that thou by them mightest war a good warfare; 
 
19 Holding faith, and a good conscience; which some having put away concerning faith have made shipwreck: 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Titus 1:9-11 -- "Holding fast the faithful word as he hath been taught, that he may be able by sound doctrine both to exhort and to convince the gainsayersFor there are many unruly and vain talkers and deceivers, specially they of the circumcision: whose mouths must be stopped, who subvert whole houses, teaching things which they ought not, for filthy lucre’s sake."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
15 hours ago, beameup said:

Then Leviticus should be equally applicable, as it is part of the entire "Word of God", written to us Christians.  I believe that 7th Day Adventists take this position.  Since the Jews rejected Jesus, and hence their "inheritance",  then all the Book is written to "us" and for "us" and there never was a group of disciples that believed that the King would return to immediately set-up his "earthly" Kingdom.. right?

PS: They have been saying for 1700 years that the "Temple Mount" is where the Temple was located, so it MUST be so.... just like the King James translators put Paul's name on "Hebrews".

Jesus explaining Leviticus to the Jews

Mar 7:18-23 And he saith unto them, Are ye so without understanding also? Do ye not perceive, that whatsoever thing from without entereth into the man, it cannot defile him; Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats? And he said, That which cometh out of the man, that defileth the man. For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, Thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness: All these evil things come from within, and defile the man.

"out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, Thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lasciviousness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness: All these evil things come from within, and defile the man." No Christian is allowed to do these things. No Jewish Christian, No Gentile Christian. Does the law condemn any man who does those things? Yes. What happens when they do them? They sin. Who can save us from our thoughts? Jesus. Jesus can forgive a man when he sins in his thoughts. Jewish men and Gentile men. Jesus is merciful to both peoples when they sin and ask him to be forgiven.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
On 2/10/2016 at 5:16 AM, Ronda said:

Here we go with the name-calling again. I don't know anyone here who quotes Ruckman.

Yes, he did! Christ never said to call people names and unfairly categorize them with people they are not associated with.

It's not name calling, it's marking them and identifying them.  There's nothing wrong with that.  And our Lord Jesus Christ certainly did call friend and foe alike names.  

Many of the heresies you promote are also promoted by Ruckman.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
2 hours ago, swathdiver said:

It's not name calling, it's marking them and identifying them.  There's nothing wrong with that.  And our Lord Jesus Christ certainly did call friend and foe alike names.  

Many of the heresies you promote are also promoted by Ruckman.

Ruckman, Ruckman, Ruckman, Ruckman....

On 2/10/2016 at 5:16 AM, Ronda said:

Here we go with the name-calling again. I don't know anyone here who quotes Ruckman.

Yes, he did! Christ never said to call people names and unfairly categorize them with people they are not associated with.

There have actually been a few contributors to this forum in the past who were trained at Peter Ruckman's school. The majority of them were gracious and did no name calling. It's the baby bottler's that remain in this forum that do all the name calling. They are so spiritual. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Some years ago there were a few "Ruckmanites" here who were mostly civil but the more of them which came here the less civil they all became. This resulted in a mass banning.

There is a big difference between discussion for the sake of learning and those who join a forum with differing views and attempt to push their views upon them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
9 hours ago, Critical Mass said:

Ruckman, Ruckman, Ruckman, Ruckman....

There have actually been a few contributors to this forum in the past who were trained at Peter Ruckman's school. The majority of them were gracious and did no name calling. It's the baby bottler's that remain in this forum that do all the name calling. They are so spiritual. 

But you're an agnostic who believes that God can't be known. Therefore, one's spirituality shouldn't matter to you since spirituality is directly associated with one's relationship with God.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



×
×
  • Create New...