Administrators HappyChristian Posted March 7, 2014 Administrators Share Posted March 7, 2014 It has been held by evolutionists that tissue and blood vessel cannot survive for the millions and billions of years that have been since the "banging" of time. They would likely be right on that, and no-one can seriously argue the point simply because no-one has been around that long to prove or disprove it. However, an interesting thing came to light a few years ago (I just saw it today)... She is excited because her research is based on the false foundation of a big bang millions/billions of years ago...she has revised her (and the "scientific realm) thoughts that soft tissue and blood vessels cannot survive millions of years. 80 million, in point of fact. Of course, this isn't the first soft tissue found. And it won't be the last, I'm thinking. But it's not because the tissue didn't abrade over millions of years. It's because the tissue isn't that old! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members TheSword Posted March 7, 2014 Members Share Posted March 7, 2014 Finding soft tissue, and even blood cells on occasion, is becoming increasingly common. It usually doesn't get a lot of publicity; presumably because it would force them to acknowledge their assumptions are wrong. When it does get reported they blast right past it like it's no surprise soft tissue would last that long...don't want pesky facts toget in the way you know... http://www.foxnews.com/science/2014/03/05/chinese-jurassic-park-yields-incredible-feathered-dino-find/ "Stick to the script" is the evolutionary mantra. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.