Members Auburn88 Posted November 18, 2013 Members Share Posted November 18, 2013 Why would I condemn her? You do such a better job of that... Why on Earth would I give somebody an ESV and then condemn somebody else for reading an ESV? Why would I condemn somebody for using the same translation I use? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Auburn88 Posted November 18, 2013 Members Share Posted November 18, 2013 It would have been very nice if a moderator would have stuck up for me in the CCM thread, when another member was going after me committing slander, OLD fashioned preacher. Just sayin... Sorry. You're not in their clique. If you are, then you're part of the protected class. If you're not, then it's pretty much open season on you. You got off easy, though. Not only would the moderators not do anything about the psychotic "Dr"JamesAch, he actually followed me to another message board where, thank goodness, the moderators there didn't put up with his constant slander and attacks. Incidentally, it looks like Ach is gaining a bit of internet notoriety. I was just listening to the Dividing Line and James White called him out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Auburn88 Posted November 18, 2013 Members Share Posted November 18, 2013 Its not hard to understand. This is a KJV site. It is against the rules to recommend other versions. I didn't recommend another version. I just said that we give new believers an ESV. I didn't say any of you should use an ESV or that you shouldn't worship the KJV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Alimantado Posted November 18, 2013 Members Share Posted November 18, 2013 You talk about a Bible version in a thread about recommending Bible versions, and you even quote the OP asking 'does anyone have any suggestions' before talking about the ESV directly below. It's just obvious from that context that you were recommending a Bible version. Or are you saying that you posted a sentence about the ESV randomly and it's just a coincidence that it ended up in a thread about Bible versions and even contained a quote of the OP? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Alimantado Posted November 18, 2013 Members Share Posted November 18, 2013 OK. I'll play along: When did I say anything about having a problem with what translation somebody uses? Where did OFP say that you said anything about having a problem with what translation somebody uses? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Auburn88 Posted November 18, 2013 Members Share Posted November 18, 2013 Where did OFP say that you said anything about having a problem with what translation somebody uses? Post #27. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators OLD fashioned preacher Posted November 18, 2013 Moderators Share Posted November 18, 2013 It would have been very nice if a moderator would have stuck up for me in the CCM thread, when another member was going after me committing slander, OLD fashioned preacher. Just sayin... It was several days before I saw it and when I read the report Bro Matt had it listed as whatever he has as a basic equivalent to "under investigation". So, the ball was in the admin's court. I'm in and out (mostly out) due to being busy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators OLD fashioned preacher Posted November 18, 2013 Moderators Share Posted November 18, 2013 Sorry. You're not in their clique. If you are, then you're part of the protected class. If you're not, then it's pretty much open season on you. You got off easy, though. Not only would the moderators not do anything about the psychotic "Dr"JamesAch, he actually followed me to another message board where, thank goodness, the moderators there didn't put up with his constant slander and attacks. Incidentally, it looks like Ach is gaining a bit of internet notoriety. I was just listening to the Dividing Line and James White called him out. Can't speak for admin or other mods, but sometimes it's days or even weeks that I'm out. Sometimes I look at a couple of new posts, sometimes several, sometimes all. If it's a new subject with a lot of threads I may or may not have the time to read them. By the time I saw the report admin was there. If Ach was PMed, you wouldn't know unless you were also PMed -- unless I sent the message, I wouldn't know either. As to my comment to you-- OP made it clear there was a Bible of potential interest BUT wasn't KJV. You later made the statement (after receiving infraction points from another mod) that insinuated you were incredulous that she (owner of ESV) hadn't been condemned for owning an ESV (contextually following "mention" of ESVs being given by your church). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Alimantado Posted November 18, 2013 Members Share Posted November 18, 2013 Post #27. Looked. Not there. First of all he said 'if', second he was talking about you possibly being anti-KJVO, not anti-KJV. This game of pedantry of yours is quite fun, Auburn! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Auburn88 Posted November 18, 2013 Members Share Posted November 18, 2013 Can't speak for admin or other mods, but sometimes it's days or even weeks that I'm out. Sometimes I look at a couple of new posts, sometimes several, sometimes all. If it's a new subject with a lot of threads I may or may not have the time to read them. By the time I saw the report admin was there. If Ach was PMed, you wouldn't know unless you were also PMed -- unless I sent the message, I wouldn't know either. As to my comment to you-- OP made it clear there was a Bible of potential interest BUT wasn't KJV. You later made the statement (after receiving infraction points from another mod) that insinuated you were incredulous that she (owner of ESV) hadn't been condemned for owning an ESV (contextually following "mention" of ESVs being given by your church). First of all, given the fact that he didn't stop, if there was any PM, evidently, it was one of encouragement. Second, shouldn't she be condemned for reading that evil, wicked, toenail fungus inducing ESV? If not, why not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Auburn88 Posted November 18, 2013 Members Share Posted November 18, 2013 Looked. Not there. First of all he said 'if', second he was talking about you possibly being anti-KJVO, not anti-KJV. This game of pedantry of yours is quite fun, Auburn! Your illiteracy is duly noted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Arbo Posted November 18, 2013 Members Share Posted November 18, 2013 Must be a slow day... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members candlelight Posted November 18, 2013 Members Share Posted November 18, 2013 It was several days before I saw it and when I read the report Bro Matt had it listed as whatever he has as a basic equivalent to "under investigation". So, the ball was in the admin's court. I'm in and out (mostly out) due to being busy. Thank you for answering me, OLD fashioned preacher. I am glad that the whole thread disappeared. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Alimantado Posted November 18, 2013 Members Share Posted November 18, 2013 Your illiteracy is duly noted. Your disingenuousness is duly noted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators HappyChristian Posted November 18, 2013 Author Administrators Share Posted November 18, 2013 Why on Earth would I give somebody an ESV and then condemn somebody else for reading an ESV? Why would I condemn somebody for using the same translation I use? I didn't mean about the ESV. I just meant about the condemning part. You're quite good at it, so I don't need to do it. Have a nice day, Auburn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.