Jump to content
  • Welcome to Online Baptist

    Free to join.

JerryNumbers

Billy Graham

Recommended Posts

On ‎5‎/‎5‎/‎2017 at 11:05 AM, Invicta said:

Over tenty years ago, we went to a Baptist Church in Ashford.  While we were there Billy Graham came to England.  Our church was the only one in the town who did not join in to support Graham. 

Totally sick and demented that any Christian would be against Graham when he has always preached from the pulpit the biblical doctrine of salvation. Those statements that are attributed to Graham about Graham supposedly believing that salvation can come about apart from Jesus are totally false as he does not really believe those statements that he supposedly made that contradict the Bible but he was suffering from some kind of mental illness.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

John, I hope you're trolling here. To say that he was suffering from some sort of mental illness when he said some things he said, but to stand and uphold other things he said, and to outright deny that he said certain things he is well known for, well, either you have no sense of reality in yourself, or you;'re just playing with us.

Billy Graham gave up basic solid Bible doctrine for the love and approval of the world a long time ago. He is an ecumenical compromiser, at best, and the fringe of heresy, at worst.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Ukulelemike said:

John, I hope you're trolling here. To say that he was suffering from some sort of mental illness when he said some things he said, but to stand and uphold other things he said, and to outright deny that he said certain things he is well known for, well, either you have no sense of reality in yourself, or you;'re just playing with us.

Billy Graham gave up basic solid Bible doctrine for the love and approval of the world a long time ago. He is an ecumenical compromiser, at best, and the fringe of heresy, at worst.

Every time I heard Graham preach on Television in his Crusades or otherwise it was always the biblical doctrine of salvation. So it is nonsense to state that he believed those statements that were against the Bible doctrine of salvation when he preached the biblical doctrine of salvation in his Crusades.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

John, I have a question for you. Has Billy Graham done something for you and your family that makes you so fiercely attached to him? Perhaps were they saved at a crusade? You seem awfully determined to believe that he is totally above doctrinal reproach, so to speak.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, John Yurich said:

Totally sick and demented that any Christian would be against Graham when he has always preached from the pulpit the biblical doctrine of salvation. Those statements that are attributed to Graham about Graham supposedly believing that salvation can come about apart from Jesus are totally false as he does not really believe those statements that he supposedly made that contradict the Bible but he was suffering from some kind of mental illness.

How come every other church including Catholics supported him and why did he send "enquirers" back to their home dead churches?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Salyan said:

John, I have a question for you. Has Billy Graham done something for you and your family that makes you so fiercely attached to him? Perhaps were they saved at a crusade? You seem awfully determined to believe that he is totally above doctrinal reproach, so to speak.

 

None of my family were saved at a Billy Graham Crusade. The only thing that Graham did for me was to provide me with the biblical doctrine of salvation at an early age when I started watching his Crusades on Television at the age of 8. I was raised by my Catholic parents to watch Graham and other Evangelical Protestant ministers on Television to learn the Evangelical Protestant doctrine of salvation. If Graham has preached the biblical doctrine of salvation in his Crusades then logically he does not really believe that salvation can come about apart from Jesus regardless of what he may have stated in those articles.

17 hours ago, Invicta said:

How come every other church including Catholics supported him and why did he send "enquirers" back to their home dead churches?

I do not know the answer.

Edited by John Yurich

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see what an influence he was in your life. It's hard to hear anything against someone that has been important to us. I remember the first time I heard anything spoken against Elizabeth Elliot and James Dobson (both influential evangelical figures in my youth) - it was pretty much unbelievable to me that there could be anything wrong with anything they said! But all men are fallible.

I really don't see the mutual exclusion here that you do. Let me illustrate. If one person in a particular setting (say casual workplace acquaintance) ask where I was from, they'd get the quick answer (hometown, central AB). If another person in another setting (say good friend at home) was to ask me, they'd probably get a more thorough answer (born in BC, moved back at such an age to be with family, etc.). The first answer does not negate the second.

In the same fashion, it is completely possible for Graham to give a short definition of salvation in his crusades, and a more thorough explanation of his views in that area when giving interviews or writing books. His short definition may sound correct to us (and frankly, since the crusades are designed to appeal to a wide variety of denominations, he probably chooses his words carefully while preaching in them so as not to offend anyone), while his more detailed explanation exposes some serious doctrinal deviances.

Ultimately, what you choose to believe about any person is your choice. It really doesn't affect me at all. I am concerned, though, that you allow yourself, in any part of life, to consider all the pertinent information, and not reject out of hand anything that does not meet with your preconceptions. It is not logical to refuse to accept a man's own words as evidence of his beliefs. Faith is not strengthened by the refusal to challenge it, and God's Word is strong enough to stand up to our questions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, John Yurich said:

None of my family were saved at a Billy Graham Crusade. The only thing that Graham did for me was to provide me with the biblical doctrine of salvation at an early age when I started watching his Crusades on Television at the age of 8. I was raised by my Catholic parents to watch Graham and other Evangelical Protestant ministers on Television to learn the Evangelical Protestant doctrine of salvation. If Graham has preached the biblical doctrine of salvation in his Crusades then logically he does not really believe that salvation can come about apart from Jesus regardless of what he may have stated in those articles.

I do not know the answer.

Some were saved as a result of his campaigns, including some members of my own family, but many whopo were enquiring were sent back to Catholic churches,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/8/2017 at 1:15 PM, John Yurich said:

Totally sick and demented that any Christian would be against Graham when he has always preached from the pulpit the biblical doctrine of salvation. Those statements that are attributed to Graham about Graham supposedly believing that salvation can come about apart from Jesus are totally false as he does not really believe those statements that he supposedly made that contradict the Bible but he was suffering from some kind of mental illness.

If it is true that he is suffering from some kind of mental illness due to old age, then his ministry needs to keep him from speaking in public.

His quotes about people getting in to heaven apart from saving faith in Jesus, are killing us in personal evangelism. His name alone nearly makes him an "authority" on salvation to many people who are biblically illiterate. When Billy Graham says something, his name trumps mine in a discussion about salvation. So it's not uncommon to have someone tell me "well Billy Graham says....".

I want Billy Graham to finish the race well, and not let his "feelings" on a subject take precedence over the Bible.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Free eBook... Billy Graham's Sad Disobedience.... available in pdf, mobi (Kindle) and ePub formats.  

Web page: https://www.wayoflife.org/free_ebooks/billy_grahams_disobedience.php

Direct pdf link: http://www.wayoflife.org/free_ebooks/downloads/Billy_Grahams_Sad_Disobedience.pdf

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

"Totally sick and demented..." is unacceptable speech toward members who just don't happen to agree with you, John Yurich. You are hereby officially warned, and as soon as I finish this, you will receive warning points. Step back and be a little less (really, a whole lot less) obnoxious towards fellow Christians. It seems that you are more concerned with defending a compromiser than you are in being gracious in your speech towards Christians.

A word to the wise should be sufficient. We shall see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The plain facts of the matter:

  1. some people were saved under the ministry of Billy Graham
  2. Billy Graham from some of the earliest times spoke in interviews things that are contrary to biblical salvation.
  3. Billy Graham is known to accept and stand with groups that clearly DO NOT preach the biblical Gospel.

Those are the facts.

WHY he stands with unbiblical groups, and WHY he says things in interviews that are contrary to the Biblical Gospel is actually NOT IN THE LEAST BIT IMPORTANT.

If he is mentally unstable as you suggest without any evidence or proof. or if he knew exactly what he was doing and why, it makes no difference - some people were saved under his ministry and preaching, but in interviews he teaches a false gospel.

End of story, those are the facts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Other plain facts..

People Have Been led, Are Being led, and Will Be led into ecumenism by Billy Grahams own ecumenism...  That is also fact.

Ditto on his False Gospel teaching also...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, HappyChristian said:

"Totally sick and demented..." is unacceptable speech toward members who just don't happen to agree with you, John Yurich. You are hereby officially warned, and as soon as I finish this, you will receive warning points. Step back and be a little less (really, a whole lot less) obnoxious towards fellow Christians. It seems that you are more concerned with defending a compromiser than you are in being gracious in your speech towards Christians.

A word to the wise should be sufficient. We shall see.

Graham is not a compromiser if he has always preached from the pulpit the biblical doctrine of salvation. Those statements that Graham stated in those articles about salvation coming about apart from Jesus are not what he really believes if he preaches the biblical doctrine of salvation from the pulpit. It is not logical to believe that Graham believes that salvation can come about apart from Jesus when he preaches the biblical doctrine of salvation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Below is from the book two posts above.  That is not compromise?   If not... please tell me what it is.  That is merely one example of many many many.

 

In 1993, Graham repeated this doctrine in an interview with David Frost.
“And I think there is that hunger for God and people are living as best they know how according to the light that they have. Well, I think they’re in a separate category than people like Hitler and people who have just defied God, and shaken their fists at God. … I would say that God, being a God of mercy, we have to rest it right there, and say that God is a God of mercy and love, and how it happens, we don’t know” (The Charlotte Observer, Feb. 16, 1993).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, 1611mac said:

Below is from the book two posts above.  That is not compromise?   If not... please tell me what it is.  That is merely one example of many many many.

 

In 1993, Graham repeated this doctrine in an interview with David Frost.
“And I think there is that hunger for God and people are living as best they know how according to the light that they have. Well, I think they’re in a separate category than people like Hitler and people who have just defied God, and shaken their fists at God. … I would say that God, being a God of mercy, we have to rest it right there, and say that God is a God of mercy and love, and how it happens, we don’t know” (The Charlotte Observer, Feb. 16, 1993).

And you actually believe that Graham believes what he stated in 1993? Why would you believe that Graham really believes that salvation can come about apart from Jesus when he preaches the biblical doctrine of salvation? That is totally illogical for anybody to believe that Graham believes that salvation comes about apart from Jesus when he preaches the biblical doctrine of salvation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, John Yurich said:

And you actually believe that Graham believes what he stated in 1993? Why would you believe that Graham really believes that salvation can come about apart from Jesus when he preaches the biblical doctrine of salvation? That is totally illogical for anybody to believe that Graham believes that salvation comes about apart from Jesus when he preaches the biblical doctrine of salvation.

John,

I appreciate what I perceive as being your sense of humor; however, Mr. Graham has shown in personal interviews what his view of salvation is...and it's not biblical. 

If this is all just a game to you (along with your other posts in other threads), then have your fun while it lasts. It's no longer humorous...even to me. If it's not a game, and you actually believe what you're posting, then you have a long way to go my friend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, John Yurich said:

And you actually believe that Graham believes what he stated in 1993? Why would you believe that Graham really believes that salvation can come about apart from Jesus when he preaches the biblical doctrine of salvation? That is totally illogical for anybody to believe that Graham believes that salvation comes about apart from Jesus when he preaches the biblical doctrine of salvation.

John, since it seems that there is no reason to believe what anyone says you might as well not reply to posts as I have no reason to believe that you believe what you say. Have a good day my friend.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, No Nicolaitans said:

John,

I appreciate what I perceive as being your sense of humor; however, Mr. Graham has shown in personal interviews what his view of salvation is...and it's not biblical. 

If this is all just a game to you (along with your other posts in other threads), then have your fun while it lasts. It's no longer humorous...even to me. If it's not a game, and you actually believe what you're posting, then you have a long way to go my friend.

Graham's does not really believe those statements he made in those interviews because of the fact that he preaches the biblical doctrine of salvation from the pulpit. It is totally illogical for anybody to believe that Graham believes those statements he made in those interviews.

2 minutes ago, 1611mac said:

John, since it seems that there is no reason to believe what anyone says you might as well not reply to posts as I have no reason to believe that you believe what you say. Have a good day my friend.

When a minister makes statements that contradict what he preaches from the pulpit then it is only logical to believe that he does not believe those statements made outside of the pulpit.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/15/2012 at 3:57 AM, irishman said:

Yes, Presbyterians are Catholic, but not "Roman Catholic" same with Lutheran and Episcopalian. They merely broke away from popish control, but kept most of their false doctrine.

I believe Billy Sunday was Presbyterian too, and he had some funny ideas. J. Vernon Mcgee also.

While Billy Sunday and J. Vernon McGee were Presbyterians, they were also fundamentalists. Bob Jones Sr. was a fundamentalist as well. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, John Yurich said:

When a minister makes statements that contradict what he preaches from the pulpit then it is only logical to believe that he does not believe those statements made outside of the pulpit.

Does a pulpit magically make a preacher and/or his words infallible?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If God calls a man (and we cannot know for sure that he didn't), and that man starts off well in his youth, do we do well to gnash upon him ourselves today? If people were saved in the beginning (and there are many thousands with solid testimonies of salvation from his early crusades) can we completely disregard all fruit because of later bad fruit, and say God never had his hand upon him? I view this topic in light of the example we have of David and Saul. Saul went off the rails bad later in life, but David still refused to verbally castigate him, out of respect for the One who called Saul initially, and whom Saul would eventually give an answer to. The callings of God are without repentance. May I caution us to be careful how we denigrate a man who did great things for God at one time, and leave judgement in the hands of that God?

I do not contradict or doubt all of the examples given of his falling away, nor am I a fan or follower. However, as men of God, we must always humbly remember that but for the grace of God, there stand we all. A little grace from us for a wayward, fallen brother would not be out of line.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, weary warrior said:

If God calls a man (and we cannot know for sure that he didn't), and that man starts off well in his youth, do we do well to gnash upon him ourselves today? If people were saved in the beginning (and there are many thousands with solid testimonies of salvation from his early crusades) can we completely disregard all fruit because of later bad fruit, and say God never had his hand upon him? I view this topic in light of the example we have of David and Saul. Saul went off the rails bad later in life, but David still refused to verbally castigate him, out of respect for the One who called Saul initially, and whom Saul would eventually give an answer to. The callings of God are without repentance. May I caution us to be careful how we denigrate a man who did great things for God at one time, and leave judgement in the hands of that God?

I do not contradict or doubt all of the examples given of his falling away, nor am I a fan or follower. However, as men of God, we must always humbly remember that but for the grace of God, there stand we all. A little grace from us for a wayward, fallen brother would not be out of line.

Graham does not really believe those statements in those interviews that contradict the biblical doctrine of salvation that he preached from the pulpit. And thus it is illogical to believe that Graham believes those statements in those interviews that contradict the biblical doctrine of salvation that he preached from the pulpit.

10 minutes ago, 1611mac said:

And why is a preacher responsible for only the words he speaks in the pulpit?  

If a preacher preaches the biblical doctrine of salvation from the pulpit and makes contradictory statements outside of the pulpit then the contradictory statements he makes outside of the pulpit he does not really believe. That is logic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, weary warrior said:

I do not contradict or doubt all of the examples given of his falling away, nor am I a fan or follower. However, as men of God, we must always humbly remember that but for the grace of God, there stand we all. A little grace from us for a wayward, fallen brother would not be out of line.

Well, I think anyone would agree that we all rejoice about the "good" done in his ministry...  In my mind that is a given...

But his teaching has not changed. False doctrine is to be rebuked. If I spouted false doctrine here you would rebuke me... you wouldn't ask how many people have been saved as a result of my preaching Christ.  And then, even at that, you'd have to decide how many "salvations" it takes to "qualify" for non-rebuke.  We have too many compromising pragmatists!

 

Edited by 1611mac

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 26 Guests (See full list)

Article Categories

About Us

Since 2001, Online Baptist has been an Independent Baptist website, and we exclusively use the King James Version of the Bible. We pride ourselves on a community that uplifts the Lord.

Contact Us

You can contact us using the following link. Contact Us or for questions regarding this website please contact @pastormatt or email James Foley at jfoley@sisqtel.net

Android App

Online Baptist has a custom App for all android users. You can download it from the Google Play store or click the following icon.

×
×
  • Create New...