Members Invicta Posted September 9, 2010 Members Share Posted September 9, 2010 (edited) Yours is an emotional, subjective opinion rather than a scholarly, OBjective opinion; and I for one do not share it. In my independent opinion, a nearly 400 year-old British vernacular is not only an inferior translation; but also quite OBsolete. The Brits themselves don't even use that vernacular anymore. I do but I am not a Brit, I am English. Edited September 9, 2010 by Invicta Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Invicta Posted September 9, 2010 Members Share Posted September 9, 2010 Yours is an emotional, subjective opinion rather than a scholarly, OBjective opinion; and I for one do not share it. In my independent opinion, a nearly 400 year-old British vernacular is not only an inferior translation; but also quite OBsolete. The Brits themselves don't even use that vernacular anymore. I do but I am not a Brit, I am English. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Invicta Posted September 9, 2010 Members Share Posted September 9, 2010 And it is 400 year old English. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.