Jump to content

Baptist News

Sign in to follow this  

RSS Feed from http://www.bpnews.net/


Baptist News Feed

The news listed in this forum is taken automatically from Baptist Press. The information and links posted here is for reference purpose only. Online Baptist may or may not agree with the content posted in this forum. If you find any OBjectionable material here, please report it and the staff at Online Baptist will look into it.

404 topics in this forum

    • 0 replies
    • 281 views
    • 0 replies
    • 301 views
    • 0 replies
    • 363 views
    • 0 replies
    • 273 views
    • 0 replies
    • 381 views
    • 1 reply
    • 423 views
    • 0 replies
    • 362 views
    • 0 replies
    • 544 views
    • 0 replies
    • 354 views
    • 0 replies
    • 310 views
    • 0 replies
    • 327 views
    • 0 replies
    • 360 views
    • 0 replies
    • 230 views
    • 0 replies
    • 344 views
    • 0 replies
    • 289 views
    • 0 replies
    • 368 views
    • 1 reply
    • 464 views
    • 0 replies
    • 361 views
    • 0 replies
    • 267 views
    • 0 replies
    • 324 views
    • 0 replies
    • 381 views
    • 0 replies
    • 327 views
    • 0 replies
    • 364 views
    • 0 replies
    • 270 views
    • 0 replies
    • 358 views
Sign in to follow this  
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Recent Topics

  • Recent Posts

    • I understand the purely 'statutory' laws of the United States that Kent Hovind knowingly, and deliberately, broke. If you would have read carefully my March 11, 2015 post that you ignored, you would have understood that the most serious of Hovind's sins was not against the laws of the United States, but against the Holiness and Righteous commands as set forth in the scriptures. Kent Hovind miss-used the office of a minister of God, miss-used the leadership of the husband, was not faithful in the work of God, was a liar, a deceiver, and was not blameless in the sight of God nor in the sight of man. Kent Hovind was not, repeat, was not, fighting for religious freedom in my eyes. In my eyes Kent Hovind was fighting against the laws of the United States. Whether or not we agree with those laws is a separate debate, but, as long as the tax laws, and other laws Kent is fighting against, is on the books of the laws of the United States of America than he must obey them. If Kent Hovind is a 'sovereign' citizen, and does not want to get a 'Wedding Certificate' and wants to destroy the blessings of God that God has bestowed us in the United States than it is my hope that he leaves the United States and finds some other country to spew out his venomous hatred towards the United States.  For those on this board who knows me personally, they understand that I was a firm follower of Kent Hovind before he lied, deceived, started to speak against the United States, and changed his doctrinal beliefs concerning prophetic doctrine. I have seen other Christians, in communist China, persecuted by a totalitarian government. And, in small way, have  personally experienced  persecution in China. So, in my heart, it pains me to see, or even hear, a Christian being persecuted by a Government official. But, in my understanding, and I have studied the issue, Kent Hovind is the cause of his legal and family problems and is not suffering for the cause of Christ nor religious freedom.
    • Lovely attitude there. What about the church looking after a widow? What about this grieving woman who has lost her husband who was a faithful servant for who knows how long being looked after. Your lack of compassion betrays you.  
    • I read about this some time ago, it is very interesting. I also remember the articles about dinosaur foot prints found in Texas. It is also interesting to think about scientists time table for events like this in regard to when these creatures walked the earth. The prints in Texas were had the distinct impressions of human tracks made in the same dinosaur tracks. That kind of blows evolution scientists ideas that dinosaurs lived long before man evolved.
    • Next matter then....... (And note that I am not changing because I cannot answer you, I am changing because YOU WILL NOT answer the previous points.) Genesis 17  7  And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee.  8  And I will give unto thee, and to thy seed after thee, the land wherein thou art a stranger, all the land of Canaan, for an everlasting possession; and I will be their God. note  9  And God said unto Abraham, Thou shalt keep my covenant therefore, thou, and thy seed after thee in their generations.  10  This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised.  11  And ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskin; and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you.  12  And he that is eight days old shall be circumcised among you, every man child in your generations, he that is born in the house, or bought with money of any stranger, which is not of thy seed. note  13  He that is born in thy house, and he that is bought with thy money, must needs be circumcised: and my covenant shall be in your flesh for an everlasting covenant.  14  And the uncircumcised man child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised, that soul shall be cut off from his people; he hath broken my covenant.   God made an EVERLASTING COVENANT that the lan would be an EVERLASTING POSESSION. I hope the everlasting life that God promises is not like your idea of an everlasting covenant - one that can be broken and is therefore not actually everlasting. I hope everlasting life is JUST LIKE God's everlasting promises - IT LASTS FOREVER..... So then - if it was given as an everlasting covenant then the people MUST still exist or it has failed and WAS NEVER everlasting in the first place. Explain how it is that your position makes God  liar, but you still think you are right and....... God is wrong?!?!?!?!   And OF COURSE you still have not done this board the basic courtesy of properly introducing yourself in the intro section, which is a glaring commonality with the false teachers who come to this forum to cause trouble.
    • Purely statutory...... statutory /ˈstatʃʊt(ə)ri,ˈstatjʊt(ə)ri/ adjective required, permitted, or enacted by statute. Oh you mean purely about a law made by government? Yep it is a pure legal matter. He broke the law, and he paid for it. In this matter Hovind was not fighting for religious freedom - he was fighting to not pay taxes - it was a money issue plain and simple. And Alan would not be happy to see any Christian persecuted. This is the verse that applies to his case: 1Pe 4:15 But let none of you suffer as a murderer, or as a thief, or as an evildoer, or as a busybody in other men's matters.       And you still have not done this board the basic courtesy of properly introducing yourself in the intro section, which is the standard practice of false teachers who come here to cause trouble.

Article Categories

About Us

Since 2001, Online Baptist has been an Independent Baptist website, and we exclusively use the King James Version of the Bible. We pride ourselves on a community that uplifts the Lord.

Contact Us

You can contact us using the following link. Contact Us or for questions regarding this website please contact @pastormatt or email James Foley at jfoley@sisqtel.net

Android App

Online Baptist has a custom App for all android users. You can download it from the Google Play store or click the following icon.

×
×
  • Create New...