Bible - KJV or Modern Version Discussion

1,238 topics in this forum

1. 

   Another Gospel 1 2 3 4 7

   July 10, 2005 by AVDeaf

   • 3 followers
   • 103 replies
   • 7.8k views

   What is another gospel? Read Galatians 1:6-12 What version is another gospel? Or Tell me about what another gospel means? Any discussions?

   

   Last reply by Martyr_4_FutureJoy, July 28, 2021

   • 
   • 
3. 

   Another question I have. 1 2 3 4

   March 28, 2012 by teylacarter91

   • • Administrators
   • 48 replies
   • 3.8k views

   I have been doing a lot of studying and I have found that the KJB was not the first Bible to be translated to English. Wycliffe (1382) Tyndale (1526) Coverdale (1535) Matthew (1537) Great Bible (1539) Geneva (1560) Bishops (1568) Douai-Rhemis (1582-1610) King James (1611) So why are Independent Fundamentalists King James only? I do not want to sound rude or discredit anyone... I am simply curious.

   

   Last reply by teylacarter91, April 1, 2012

   • 
4. 

   Answering a hypocritical KJB critic 1 2

   May 30, 2005 by brandplucked

   • 25 replies
   • 1.5k views

   This conversation took place at another club. Hypocricy of those who do not believe any Bible ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote: Originally Posted by Huldrych You mean "texts." Found this over at kjvonly.org: http://www.kjvonly.org/jamesp/jdprice_greek_text.htm He goes on to show where the AV departs from Stephanus, and where it agrees with other texts (Complutensian Polyglot, Vulgate, etc.) But here's another interesting quote from that article:"Scrivener produced the Greek text that underlies the English of the 1611 edition of the AV. There have been a few alterations in later revisions of the AV t…

   

   Last reply by auburn_tiger, May 31, 2005
5. 

   Answering the Typical Anti-KJB Only sites

   December 19, 2011 by brandplucked

   • 1 reply
   • 5.5k views

   Answering the Typical Anti-King James Bible Site During the past several years since I have been involved in the Bible version discussion I have come into contact with many Bible believers and with many whom I refer to as “Bible Agnostics”. The Bible believers are those who believe God has been faithful and true to His promises to preserve His words in “the book of the LORD” (Isaiah 34:16) and that He did not lie nor exaggerate when the Lord Jesus Christ said “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.” (Matthew 24:35) We believe all the evidence points to the Authorized King James Holy Bible as being this Book. The Bible agnostic, on the o…

   

   Last reply by John81, December 19, 2011
6. 

   Any Guesses As To What... 1 2 3 4

   December 31, 2013 by candlelight

   • 54 replies
   • 3.2k views
   

   Last reply by candlelight, January 1, 2014

   • 
7. 

   any help on this would be appreiated 1 2

   January 3, 2006 by Trust in Jesus

   • 22 replies
   • 1.4k views

   This JW has written this to me, even though I know its blasphemous, any suggestions how I can answer and it be short and to the point?I know this is asking a lot, but any help, I would be very thankful.. :) :oops: forgot the main part didnt I?Here it is...sorry it is so long.. Here is an article published by JW's that explains some of what we believe of the relationship between God and his Son. The article actually comes in a few different subtitles but this section of it covers quite a bit... I have to warn that it goes into a lot of detail and is rather long (notice also that they use some of the original languages to explain and also cross reference different Bible …

   

   Last reply by lettheredeemedsayso, January 5, 2006
8. 

   Any Reasons Why Some Don't Like Strong's Concordance? 1 2 3 4

   April 11, 2007 by Jerry

   • • Administrators
   • 52 replies
   • 6.6k views

   I was reading some older threads tonight, and I found one where at least two people knocked Strong's Concordance, without listing any reasons. I was wondering what problems people had with it? The only two problems I have found with it are: Defining Lucifer as Venus, the morning star. Though considering that his definition was approximately 2400 years later, it is very possible now that the word Hellel IS associated with Venus - but that doesn't mean it was in Isaiah's time, nor that the passage anywhere contains that meaning. In fact, it is the more liberal translations that are trying to blur the line between the Morning Star and Lucifer, containing cross-references…

   

   Last reply by PeterAV, April 12, 2007
9. 

   Any Spanish Speaking Brothers in here?

   November 24, 2005 by Guest Guest

   • 10 replies
   • 913 views

   Hi Gang, I need to know, is there anyone in here fluent in reading, speaking and writing spanish? I have a part on my website, that I used one of those online translators, and I don't know if it worked right or not. I need someone to traslate a page to spanish. can anyone help? MP

   

   Last reply by Guest, December 11, 2005
10. 

    Any thoughts on these Bible verses that I've noticed?

    July 18, 2007 by Guest Guest

    • 1 reply
    • 523 views

    Matt. 26:26-29 Mark 14:22-25 Luke 22:19-20 Luke 24:30-31 John 6:48-56 1 Cor. 11:23-31 Luke 1:48 Phil. 3:17 Matt. 16:18-19 Isaiah 22:20-23 Luke 22:32 John 21:17 Acts 1:15 Acts 2:14 Acts 4:8 Acts 10:44 Acts 1:20 Acts 8:18 Romans 10:14-15 Matt. 9:8 Matt. 18:15-18 1 Cor. 12:27-30 Romans 12:4 Romans 13:1-2 John 16:13 1 Tim. 3:15 John 8:51 Eph. 3:15 Luke 23:43 Luke 20:37-38 Matt. 22:32 Mark 12:26-27 Matt. 18:10 Rev. 5:1-8 Rev. 8:3-4 Exodus 25:18?20 Numbers 21:8?9 James 2:20,24,26 Mark 8:34 Mark 13:13 Matthew 10:22 Matthew 10:38 Matthew 19:17 Matthew 25:41-46 John 14:15 Romans 11:22 Galatians 5:19-21 Hebrews 10:26 1 John 2:3-4,2…

    

    Last reply by lettheredeemedsayso, July 18, 2007
11. 

    Anybody ever read this?

    May 7, 2006 by Will

    • 5 replies
    • 898 views

    Anybody ever read the "Websters Bible?" It's a revision of the King James Bible done by that Webster dude who did our dictionary way back in the 1800's. I think it was a revision to change some more archaic words by and large. I just downloaded it off of E-Sword to check it out.

    

    Last reply by Jerry, May 8, 2006
12. 

    Apocrypha

    March 29, 2012 by teylacarter91

    • 14 replies
    • 1.6k views

    Hello all, I have yet another question (I am fascinated discussing things like with with people) I know people who are IFB KJB only. I respect that. Some are part of a group on Fabcebook "I am a Independent Fundamentalist 1611 King James Only Baptist" -something like that. When I mention the Apocrypha they get very defensive, saying its pagan and evil. But as I studied more on the subject I found that the 1611 King James had the Apocrapha. and it was not until 274 years after it was printed that it was removed. So by saying you believe the 1611 Edition of the King James is the one true Bible... why do you reject the Apocrapha? I would love to hear your thoughts …

    

    Last reply by Invicta, April 3, 2012

    • 
13. 

    Archaisms in the KJV. 1 2 3 4 8

    October 18, 2018 by Jordan Kurecki

    • 4 followers
    • 108 replies
    • 8.8k views

    I’ve been doing some studying into the archaic features of the KJV. i found that the difference between -eth and -est is that one is second person and another is third person. So it would seem that this would add detail to the Bible and therefore accuracy. However, practically speaking it seems to me that this doesn’t really add information because of English Syntax, it would seem that the subject of the sentence will always supple that information and therefore these endings are unnecessary. Does anyone know of any places in the English bible where having these Archaic endings give the reader more clarity?

    

    Last reply by Salyan, March 16, 2019

    • 
    • 
    • 
    • 
14. 

    Are Bible Versions 99.5% the Same? 1 2

    January 18, 2010 by brandplucked

    • 22 replies
    • 2.4k views

    Are all bible versions 99.5% the same? One of the common and most obvious falsehoods we often hear by those who rail against the idea that the King James Bible is the complete, inspired and 100% true words of God is the claim that all thousands of textual variations out there are very minor and not of any real importance, and that the various bible versions are basically 99.5% the same. These ridiculous claims by those who do not believe that ANY Bible in ANY language are the complete, preserved and infallible words of God are so easily proven to be absurdly false that one has to assume that such people are either speaking out of complete ignorance of the facts or th…

    

    Last reply by Adamski, November 16, 2012

    • 
15. 

    Are Commentaries on the Bible Necessary? 1 2

    July 7, 2007 by Guest Guest

    • • Administrators
    • 19 replies
    • 1.9k views

    Does that go against the basic principle of being a Bible alone Christian?

    

    Last reply by Guest, February 9, 2008
16. 

    Are parts of the Bible not inspired?

    June 17, 2005 by JohnnyGotham

    • 3 replies
    • 817 views

    Someone said that only the spoken word was inspired and not the written word. Is this true?

    

    Last reply by bloodwashed52, June 17, 2005
17. 

    Are pride and boasting Christian virtues in the mvs?

    February 5, 2004 by brandplucked

    • 0 replies
    • 592 views

    Rejoice or Be Proud? In the true Holy Bible boasting in oneself is never commended as a good thing. Scripture allows for boasting in the accomplishments of others, but not in ourselves. For example, see 2 Corinthians 7:14; 8:24, and 9:3-4. Here the apostle Paul boasted to others of the Corinthians because they were ready to provide for the needs of the poor saints in Jerusalem. Boasting in oneself is done only in a sense of irony, and is called "folly" and speaking foolishly - See 2 Corinthians 11:1, 10, 16-18 "That which I speak, I speak it not after the Lord, but as it were foolishly, in this confidence of boasting. Seeing that many glory after the flesh, I will…

    

    Last reply by brandplucked, February 5, 2004
18. 

    Are Proverbs promises? 1 2

    April 4, 2009 by Annie

    • • Administrators
    • 21 replies
    • 8k views

    <>

    

    Last reply by John81, January 24, 2010
19. 

    Are the names of the Gospels mistranslations?

    September 25, 2005 by JohnnyGotham

    • 1 reply
    • 574 views

    Someone said that because Matthew, Mark, Luke and John don't sound like middleeastern names they must be translation errors.

    

    Last reply by Jerry, September 25, 2005
20. 

    Are there any biblical grounds for divorce? 1 2 3 4 7

    February 18, 2012 by Bro Ryan

    • • Administrators
    • 1 follower
    • 103 replies
    • 7.3k views

    I mean if your husband/wife commits adultery or what if your husband/wife converts to another religion? Is it ok then for a divorce?

    

    Last reply by John81, April 3, 2012

    • 
21. 

    Are There Things In Scripture That Talk... 1 2

    June 11, 2014 by candlelight

    • 27 replies
    • 2.3k views
    

    Last reply by candlelight, June 14, 2014

    • 
22. 

    Are they saved? 1 2

    January 30, 2009 by Guest Guest

    • 18 replies
    • 1.2k views

    If someone was saved out of a NIV or any modern Bible are they really saved? Hope this isn't a stupid question!

    

    Last reply by Guest, January 31, 2009
23. 

    Are tongues for today?

    October 9, 2010 by irishman

    • 1 reply
    • 668 views

    The Gift of Tongues Are Tongues for Today? There is much controversy over this question in the church today. Let’s take a close look at the gift of speaking in tongues. Part l “Sign” Gifts: Certain gifts were given to the early church as signs to the people that something supernatural has happened. They were “attention getters” so that the multitudes would take notice. These “sign gifts” were needed during the inception and building of the church, and were given by Him for that purpose. Most of them are OBviously signs to the people, Jew and Gentile alike, that God was at work in their midst. One of the sign gifts was the gift of miracles (1 Cor. 12:28), an…

    

    Last reply by Covenanter, October 9, 2010
24. 

    Are you flippant with God's NAME?

    September 16, 2003 by PreachIt

    • 7 replies
    • 1.1k views

    Why Not? Exo 20:7 Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain. Si? Are you FLIPPANT with what God holds ABOVE HIS NAME?

    

    Last reply by Pastor Matt, September 16, 2003
25. 

    Are You Required To Obey This Scripture?

    May 11, 2012 by TheLionOfGod

    • 4 replies
    • 831 views

    2 John, Chapter 1 Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.

    

    Last reply by TheLionOfGod, May 12, 2012
26. 

    Are You Spirit Filled - Why

    June 17, 2013 by 1Timothy115

    • 1 follower
    • 4 replies
    • 865 views

    Why was Bezaleel filled with the spirit of God? Exodus 31:1 And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying, Exodus 31:2 See, I have called by name Bezaleel the son of Uri, the son of Hur, of the tribe of Judah: Exodus 31:3 And I have filled him with the spirit of God, in wisdom, and in understanding, and in knowledge, and in all manner of workmanship, Exodus 31:4 To devise cunning works, to work in gold, and in silver, and in brass, Exodus 31:5 And in cutting of stones, to set them, and in carving of timber, to work in all manner of workmanship. Why are we filled with the Spirit today? Acts 1:5 For John truly baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with t…

    

    Last reply by 1Timothy115, June 18, 2013

    •