Bible - KJV or Modern Version Discussion
Delve into the Scriptures: Engage in Meaningful Discussions Comparing the KJV and Modern Versions of the Bible in Our Insightful Forum.
1,233 topics in this forum
-
-
- Administrators
- 3 followers
- 11 replies
- 114 views
I know thereās a proper way to dispose a flag, but is there a proper way to dispose a Bible?
Last reply by BrotherTony, -
-
- 1 follower
- 1 reply
- 54 views
For the Love ā¤ļø of money... Sad https://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/crime/article278268013.html
Last reply by BrotherTony, -
-
- Administrators
- 4 followers
- 32 replies
- 958 views
NT usage according to http://kjvbible.net/: Christian 3 times. Believers 6 times. Saints 62 times. Brother 109 and Sister 25 times apiece. Brethren 229 times.
Last reply by BrotherTony, -
-
Who Is The Best Publisher Of The King James Version? 1 2 3
by Guest Guest- 3 followers
- 36 replies
- 13.7k views
Hi everyone. I have read that the KJV sometimes differs among publishers. Who is the best publisher to get a KJV from? :puzzled:
Last reply by BrotherTony, -
- 11 replies
- 224 views
I have understood the preservation of God's Word thru all generations to be the available access to translate the original copies. I have heard though the teaching that the KJV, and older Bibles before it are the only ones that have preserved it rightly. I am not sure about this and would like to know how someone arrived at this teaching. I believe the Bible is inerrant, infallible etc..but have understood that to be the original copies.. not later translations. The flaw in this is that God is preserving the Word in all generations..and so the original copies aren't that. I thought that that flaw in reasoning is mitigated by the fact of the original…
Last reply by Joe Chandler, -
-
- Administrators
- 18 replies
- 442 views
Are there English or other language translations of the New Testament Greek that both predate the KJV and are recognized as inspired translations?
Last reply by bluewater, -
-
- 1 follower
- 4 replies
- 170 views
The truest free bible, is the King James Bible. You will not need any special permission to use it, in your Bible teaching or reference. Does this applies to the the New King James Bible? I donāt know, newest is not always better. How much longer can the KJ Bible, stay on top, the number one Bible. Only time will tell, before your church sells out. Sad Take Care
Last reply by BrotherTony, -
- 2 followers
- 99 replies
- 6.3k views
Would you ever choose to read your Bible this way? Surely your understanding would be better if you could read straight from where the KJV was translated from right? I am asking b/c i may have a chance here shortly to study one or both of the languages and am thinking it would be a blessing to be able to read straight from the originals. What do you guys think?
Last reply by Joe Chandler, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 136 views
Last reply by Jordan Kurecki, -
- 1 follower
- 0 replies
- 157 views
Last reply by Jordan Kurecki, -
- 4 followers
- 29 replies
- 1.4k views
God used this evil king, King James, to make a great Bible, along with great men. scholars of the days, and those men that fear God, they also feared the king. Donāt mess up, or off with your head.
Last reply by heartstrings, -
-
- Administrators
- 3 followers
- 13 replies
- 1.9k views
Does anyone know anything about the new legacy standard bible? I guess it'll be available this fall. https://lsbible.org/
Last reply by Russ Pittman, -
-
-
- Administrators
- 2 replies
- 203 views
Did Adam Have A Priestly Position? Reading 'Searching for ADAM, Terry Mortenson, Editor He contrasts the verbs of Genesis 2:15 with the verbs in Numbers 3:7-10. Adams job description with that of the Levitical Priesthood. I thought the possibility intriguing enough to garner thoughts from others. Adam the first created priest! Personally, having yet to compare other scripture, I will be looking further.
Last reply by 1Timothy115, -
-
Perfect Bibles In Other Languages? 1 2 3
by Guest Guest- 2 followers
- 33 replies
- 2.3k views
Hi everyone. Are Bibles in other languages that are translated from the Textus Receptus perfect just like the KJV is or is the KJV the only perfect Bible in any language?
Last reply by CitizenoftheRealm, -
-
- Administrators
- 4 followers
- 54 replies
- 1.8k views
BrotherTony asked me to show where some modern versions remove or change passages about the deity of Christ, hence this thread. Robert Bratcher who "translated" the Good News Bible did not believe Jesus was good, so his translation was done in such a way as to present his doctrinal stance. Here are some examples: Acts 20:28 So keep watch over yourselves and over all the flock which the Holy Spirit has placed in your care. Be shepherds of the church of God, which he made his own through the blood of his Son. Does not declare God shed His own blood - therefore ruining a verse teaching Christ is both God and man, and that it was His blood that purchased our salvati…
Last reply by Salyan, -
-
-
- Administrators
- 3 followers
- 17 replies
- 788 views
I am looking to get a new Bible, leather under $80, any recommendations? Also what is everyone's take on bibles that instead of mark it refers to st. Mark?
Last reply by Peter Coppola, -
-
-
- Administrators
- 2 followers
- 10 replies
- 280 views
I donāt think so, it doesnāt look like many more still do. Some I probably think, says itās old fashion. I have it on my cell, or tablet. Many donāt know, after changing their cell phone and downloading it again the app, it removes all prior notes and highlights. 𫤠Bring your Bible to church
Last reply by MikeWatson1, -
-
- 2 followers
- 12 replies
- 433 views
Does anyone have acess to the Textus Receptus and if not then which Alexandrian greek do they mean when the say 'in the greek'?
Last reply by Jerry, -
-
- Administrators
- 1 follower
- 1 reply
- 424 views
Besides ordering and having the Bible translated into the English language, what else good, did this king do for Christians.
Last reply by Pastor Matt, -
-
- 1 follower
- 1 reply
- 263 views
Besides ordering and having the Bible translated into the English language, what else good, did this king do for Christians.
Last reply by BrotherTony, -
- 3 followers
- 2 replies
- 261 views
After the raptureā¦
Last reply by BrotherTony, -
-
- Administrators
- 3 followers
- 48 replies
- 2.2k views
I wrote a piece on this subject at hand about ten years ago, which still can be found on line. I know how it ties in with BRANCH and the four gospel (inscriptions on the cross, Jesus name at birth and elsewhere) and how these show up in other places. This writing on LBCS It was lengthy but I am sure I overlooked something. There are those that teach that there are no valid reasons, but as a Bible Believer I know better
Last reply by Pastor Scott Markle, -
-
A poster on another forum, the topic of which was questioning the authenticity of the last 12 verses in the book of Mark, wrote that it doesn't really matter because there is no doctrinal teaching in Mark 16:9-20 that cannot be proved elsewhere in agreed Scripture. I made the mistake of sticking my nose into the discussion by pointing out that actually there is a statement in verse 9, as the KJV and similar versions have it, which is used for a doctrinal teaching that is to be found nowhere else in Scripture. As the KJV and similar versions translate it, it is the only place that puts the resurrection on the first day of the week. I then suggested that whenever the d…
Last reply by rstrats, -
-
- Administrators
- 4 followers
- 14 replies
- 1.3k views
This topic is not to discuss the accuracy of the KJV or other translations, but to discuss the use of saying "I use the KJV 1611 Bible" Is it wrong to say that we use the KJV 1611 or should we say KJV 1763? A common argument against the KJV is to say that we don't use the 1611 Bible but rather the 1763. I understand what took place in the English language for the updates that took place in 1763, and I also understand why I say KJV 1611. Nobody that I'm aware of says that the Bible I read is the original KJV 1611 style, but the foundation was from the KJV 1611. It seems that that logic that is thrown in the KJV faces only applies to the Bible. I drive a 2013…
Last reply by Jordan Kurecki, -
-
- 4 followers
- 163 replies
- 7.4k views
Hi, I would love to hear the communityās feedback about using an update to the King James Version. I love the KJV. But the language is basically 400 year-old English. So if there were a simple and accurate update to the KJV that made no changes except updating the old language, would you want to use it? What would be your thoughts generally about such an update? Would you like it as a stand alone version, or as a parallel Bible with the current KJV? It would be great to hear what you all think. May God be glorified. In Christ, Joseph
Last reply by farouk,